Women Would Vote for Hitler
A woman voting on anything other than American Idol or her personal favorite type of chocolate is like watching a small child run full speed into a wall. Clearly the fundamentals are understood. The child runs, it’s going somewhere and there’s no doubt about that. The child can run. But very quickly one comes to the understanding that somewhere, somehow, the process has been perverted. Then comes the wall. Then comes the crying.
Women would vote for Hitler. Not because a woman could be talked into buying a catsup Popsicle while she was wearing white gloves, but because women are all fascists.
Don’t believe me? Let’s leave the constant threat of castration out of it for the moment. That makes it a slam dunk in my book, but that’s fine. Women are just “joking” whenever they play fascism card #1.
How about oppressive dictatorship by force or threat of violence?
Anyone who’s married will tell you a lot of things. The first of which will be, “Don’t get fucking married for any reason you dumb shit.” But a likely secondary is that marriage is not a democracy. What is it then?
Marriage is a fascist dictatorship of oppression — and so is any relationship with a woman. Work, professional, “professional”; they’re all the same. If you don’t like the flavor of the Kool-Aid and you want to add some mix, prepare to have a wailing siren of bullshit go off in your ear. That’s assault and that’s oppression. That’s enforcing your opinion through the threat of violence. If you press the issue, prepare to receive the threat of withheld friendship — or even sex whether it’s applicable or not! There was another man who pulled the same kind of shit. Yep, Hitler.
The biggest women/fascism link is a woman’s reliance on violence. Women will be the first to hit during any kind of dispute. It’s not even a percentage. It’s as much of a guarantee as it is that the sun will rise tomorrow. And as men we can all understand that the sun rises because it’s actually a star that our planet rotates around, therefore it is guaranteed to rise. We are able to remove ourselves from our personal point of view and understand that the sun isn’t rising at all. It’s actually us who are spinning around the sun. Women don’t even fucking know that.
Every morning when a woman wakes up at the crack of 10:30 she’s thrilled to shit to see that the sun’s in the sky again and her fake orange tan will look just as radiant as it did yesterday. That’s one of the biggest reasons why women shouldn’t vote. They don’t know fucking anything about anything. They know nothing.
But that’s not why women would vote for Hitler if given the chance. Say what you want about the merits of an individual ethos of governments as you will. You’re all men and therefore deserve the right to express opinion unmitigated by slander or censure. What I’m saying is that by an intrinsic party affiliation — fascist — all women would check the box marked ‘Kill Or Savagely Beat Anyone Who Doesn’t Agree With Me’. That fact has always held women back more than any mythical glass ceiling.
Related Articles:
November 7th, 2006 at 4:26 pm - IP Man-Hash: 6897e3ddf8ad0
What was the question?
-Dick
November 7th, 2006 at 5:10 pm - IP Man-Hash: f07728d5ecfae
The questions: 1) Why are the vast majority of murderers and other violent criminals men? “you would like to give the impression that men are evil because there were a few bad men in history”–men comprise over 90% of the prison population. That’s not a few, that’s a pretty significant number! It’s been men who killed 3000 people on 9/11, men who molested and murdered little girls in schools in the past weeks, men who committed the atrocities at Mai Lai…how is this compatible with being the superior sex, especially in the area of morals?
2)How do we explain the immoral leaders who were put into power and kept there not by democracies with women’s suffrage, but by male-run dictatorships?
3) How is it that women have no power or the intelligence to outwit men, yet are somehow responsible for anything evil that men do?
4) Why invest so much energy into hating women if they’re stupid and weak? My dog is stupid and weak, but I don’t hate him for it–it just is what it is.
You need to be able to defend opinions against basic arguments so as not to sound ignorant. The difference between being a ranting lunatic and having an opinion is being able to defend your position logically. I love a good argument, but arguments are based on science and facts, put together in a logical way and presented dispassionately. Resorting to incoherent obscenities just shows weakness, and is boring.
Final question-What do you get out of hating women? You know it doesn’t make sense. Was Mother Teresa a “fucking cum-guzzling whore”? Was Dorothy Day a “silly twat”? You’re not stupid, you know that it’s logically impossible that every woman in the world is stupid, weak, worthless and evil. So how does this hate help you? It doesn’t change the world. It doesn’t make you a better person. Stewing in your own bile here isn’t getting back at any women who’ve hurt you, but it is definitely hurting yourself. Why would you waste your intelligence, morality, and energy in such a useless, self-destructive way? BE the superior sex–move on and be a positive force in the world.
November 7th, 2006 at 5:25 pm - IP Man-Hash: f07728d5ecfae
Incidentally, I’m the father of three little girls. I spend MY energy trying to make the world a safer, better place for them, and all people. Maybe that would help you understand my absurd position that all human beings are valuable…
November 7th, 2006 at 5:58 pm - IP Man-Hash: 6897e3ddf8ad0
Well said. Certainly all human beings are valuable. If men were the only ones on this site, that wouldn’t even need to be said.
-Dick
November 7th, 2006 at 6:32 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4a8fa6dceb1b3
KBM804, shut the fuck up.
November 7th, 2006 at 7:38 pm - IP Man-Hash: b8625a3ae5276
In sociology and biology, infanticide is the practice of intentionally causing the death of an infant of a given species, by members of the same species - often by the mother. Why? Because women like easy targets, targets that can’t possible fight back, can’t run, and can’t hide. Guess which gender is most likely to dump a newborn in the trash? Well, it has to be men, because a woman would never place the life she just delivered into a ribbish bin and then walk away and leave it to die … no, not at all.
We can explain it by looking at the facts. Those leaders were not voted into power. They took power and used force to remain there. If there was democracy, men would have voted against them, but I guess women would vote for the incumbent - so he would probably stay in power anyway.
Who said that women are responsible for evil that men do?
We don’t hate women, we’re just pointing out that men are better than women. The feminist propaganda machinery has been pumping out a lot of bullshit about equality of the sexes, and we think that is wrong. We’re just hear to speak the truth.
I neither know who Dorothy Day is, nor do I know about Mother Teresa, but I do not recall ever saying that either of them was a “fucking cum-guzzling whore” or a “silly twat.” Those comments were squarely directed at you (and you know that). The swear words were already minimal, but your foolish comment just tempted me.
November 7th, 2006 at 8:28 pm - IP Man-Hash: 84f7c5452f5d2
KBM804 said:
The questions: 1) Why are the vast majority of murderers and other violent criminals men? “you would like to give the impression that men are evil because there were a few bad men in history”–men comprise over 90% of the prison population.
That’s not a few, that’s a pretty significant number! It’s been men who killed 3000 people on 9/11, men who molested and murdered little girls in schools in the past weeks, men who committed the atrocities at Mai Lai…how is this compatible with being the superior sex, especially in the area of morals?
-I will anwser in several parts KBM, you seem like a logical and rational person so I welcome meaningful debate.-
1. Men as 90% of the prison population.
A. How many Men are in prison for non-violent offenses? What do you consider to be an imprisonable offense? How many of those Men were raised by single mothers? Why is this so? Because in my view we have become quite a draconian nation in view of both our penal system and laws. Lawyers and legislators need jobs too as well as the growing prison industry. Did you know that we have the THIRD highest incarceration rate in the industrialised world?
For the most part I believe, (and I have facts to back this up) that women are still given excuses to commit crimes because of their gender as well. It’s slowly changing but many still have the same views of the world as you. Its Men that are held accountable and women that are given creedence. Did you know that Men are imprisoned longer than women on average for the same crimes?
In the past women were excused for many crimes because of their gender, and many weren’t even imprisoned for crimes that would have gotten a Man hanged. For some crimes that women commited because the Man was held accountable for her behavior. In short women weren’t and aren’t being held to the same level of accountability that Men are and were. What does that imply?
2. Men as Child Molestors.
In the past pedophila was a social norm in many societies, still is in some I suppose. I am not defending it however I am stating a fact. Here’s a question. Is a 19 year old man that has sex with a 17 year old girl as culpable as saaay a 23 year old woman that has sex with a 14 year old boy? According to the law and the way its handed down he is MORE culpable, for he will recieve more prison time for it in the first place. What does this imply? Women aren’t held as accountable in this area either. Its considered a “good” thing when a woman molests a child, and “bad” thing when a Man does it. Are you seeing my point yet?
3. The Mai Lai massacre
A. First off, Men were the only ones that actually PARTICIPATED in the combat of that war and most of the others in the HISTORY of the written word. If women weren’t a part of it how then can you judge the Men that were? Men are still the only ones that could be forced into war against their wills and Men are the only ones that were conscripted against their wills.
In ending this section, I will say that you only appreciate morals because of the sacrifices and wisdom of Men. Men are the ones that brought the idea of fairness into society for Men were the first to write them down.
2)How do we explain the immoral leaders who were put into power and kept there not by democracies with women’s suffrage, but by male-run dictatorships?
-There have been democracies without womens suffrage as well and they seemed to have run just fine. However how did they gain power in the first place? Through might I suppose, however it does depend upon how you define morality (another thing discovered by guess who?)-
3) How is it that women have no power or the intelligence to outwit men, yet are somehow responsible for anything evil that men do?
-I have never said that, however something must be said of many womens attempts to escape responsibility.-
4) Why invest so much energy into hating women if they’re stupid and weak? My dog is stupid and weak, but I don’t hate him for it–it just is what it is.
-I don’t hate women at all, I simply view the constant discrimination against Men for simply being Men and I hate that. I hate the idea that all that I am is merely a debt slave and a draft horse for a womans biological imperative. I hate the idea that I am merely a sperm donor in the eyes of the law and nothing more. Think on these things.-
-Strength and Honor-
November 7th, 2006 at 8:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: dd4294dbc20ed
Joe Leiberman is Darth Sidious!
November 7th, 2006 at 9:06 pm - IP Man-Hash: 309f7602abebd
@abaddon
I was planning a response also but you’ve dealt with much of it. I’ll make the following points as reinforcement.
Women are:-
75% of the physical abusers of children
35% of the sexual abusers of children
50% of domestic violence offenders
60% of abusers in dating situations
Every woman who has had the political power to send her country to war, apart from those few currently in position, has done so. 100% strike rate.
Women typically receive a third of the sentences given to men for the same crimes.
Men are:-
95% of the homeless
95% of workplace deaths
85% of suicides(90% among teenagers!)
80% of the victims of violence
and no bastard gives a fuck. In fact feminist organsisations have taken legal action to stop groups who tried to do something about these things at times.
November 8th, 2006 at 8:53 am - IP Man-Hash: f07728d5ecfae
Logic–much better.
First, I apologize if my impression that you hate women is wrong. That’s certainly the impression given by every article on here. If they were based on observations like some of the above arguments that would be different, but with titles like “Every Woman is a Cheating Whore” and “Women are Killing Mankind”, you’re not giving the impression that this is a dispassionate, fact-based site.
A couple of you questioned where it said you believed women are responsible for all evil–again, I got that impression from other things on the site (“Like any virus, women are not content with ruining their own lives. Ultimately, they seek out the lives of decent, honest men and tempt and corrupt them until they appear to be cheaters as well when nothing could be further from the truth. Cheating is like getting pregnant. It’s 100% a woman’s fault 100% of the time,” from “Every Woman is a Cheating Whore,” for example) Individuals who post may not believe that, but the articles assert it.
I see where you’re coming from. However, the overriding fallacy here is in that the two sexes are being treated as if they have two different goals, like two different species. It’s not “a woman’s biological imperative”–reproduction is the biological imperative of the species, male and female, and is the ultimate motivation of everything every organism does.
Evolutionary perspective–we, like every organism, are genes’ ways of reproducing themselves. That’s the ultimate goal. The proximal goals–all the things we think we’re working for, like status, wealth, power, a nice house, an SUV–have been, up until an insignificantly short period of time ago, the means allowing us to maximize our fitness (number of viable offspring). Where men and women butt heads is in mating strategies. Men can father an almost limitless number of offspring if he has the resources to attract enough females to mother them. Women can only give birth to maybe 30 babies over her lifetime, so she wants to breed more selectively so as to produce high quality offspring.
This leads to all kinds of societal phenomena.
diamatik said:
“In sociology and biology, infanticide is the practice of intentionally causing the death of an infant of a given species, by members of the same species - often by the mother. Why?”
The reasons for this fall into one of 3 categories: offspring quality (the child is unhealthy and therefore unlikely to survive and reproduce), limited resources (the child is unlikely to survive because of lack of food, shelter, etc), or paternity (the father of the child has been killed or is otherwise not present, making it unlikely that the child will survive–in their study of homicide, Daly and Wilson found that children living with a male that is not their bio-father are 100X more likely to be killed by him. Men do not want to invest resources in children that do not carry their genes). Because a woman’s biological investment in offspring is high, it is to her biological advantage not to invest in a child who most likely will not survive, and reproduce later when circumstances are more favorable. Women don’t commit infanticide in a vaccuum–it is generally encouraged, if not forced, by the baby’s father and the societal group in general. The same dynamics apply to abortion.
High quality men–ones who have power and resources to attract mates–are in good shape, and the men who can’t get mates get desperate. This link (http://www.utexas.edu/features/2005/murder/index.html) is a study showing that reproductive-age women leaving their husbands are most likely to be murdered by their husbands–he is desperate to not lose his ability to reproduce. This is also why men are much more aggressive than women–up until very recently in our evolutionary history, the most aggressive man would be able to mate the most. From (http://www.abc.net.au/science/slab/testost/story.htm): Professor Robert Sapolsky author of The Trouble with Testosterone, recounts the leg-crossing, knife-wielding ’subtraction’ experiment. “Remove the source of testosterone in species after species and levels of aggression typically plummet. Reinstate normal testosterone levels afterward with injections of synthetic testosterone, and aggression returns.”
Men who are not successful have to employ much more desperate strategies to be able to mate–this is where we get rape and the drive to control women by not allowing them to vote, move about freely, leave the house without wearing a chador…if you aren’t successful enough to get a woman to choose you, then you have to basically find a way to force one to mate with you.
Bottom line is that male and female aren’t two competing species. Claiming that one is bad and the other good, or one stupid and the other smart makes no sense. Men commit more violent crimes, murders, and sex crimes against both sexes and commit 65% of the sexual abuse against children (according to gwallen’s stats), women generally commit more physical abuse of children–none of it is morally right, but it’s all related to evolutionary biology, it’s what human beings are. They’re two sexes of a single population, each individual trying to maximize its own fitness–like every other living organism on earth. And apparently the system works, or none of us would exist.
November 8th, 2006 at 12:30 pm - IP Man-Hash: 6897e3ddf8ad0
Check the Frequently Asked Man Questions.
-Dick
November 8th, 2006 at 12:50 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4555637db20cf
… men are better than women.
November 8th, 2006 at 1:56 pm - IP Man-Hash: b1d70ac812cdb
And men will continue to do what it takes to preserve our blood, history, and heritage as long as the meaning of “successful” to the modern woman translates into being a billionare and looking like some metrosexual abomination.
You can talk about testosterone all you want and you’re right, but the simple facts are you aren’t taking anyone’s away or injecting them estrogen without taking a nice trip to the dark afterlife courtesy of alpha males.
And when feminism is dead, the neo-intellectual enablers like you can go back to living the “downlow” life with your metro friends when women realize that passion without power is doomed and brains without braun is weak.
November 8th, 2006 at 3:09 pm - IP Man-Hash: f07728d5ecfae
Just curious–how many of you are married or have a partner? How many have successfully reproduced? I think I see my next journal publication….
November 8th, 2006 at 3:30 pm - IP Man-Hash: 6897e3ddf8ad0
What would it be about?
-Dick
November 8th, 2006 at 4:32 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Her own scribbled misconceptions of the world around us and whatever vested tenets of feminism she might attempt to ‘prove’, etched unto paper.
- Chris Rea - The road to hell.
November 8th, 2006 at 4:49 pm - IP Man-Hash: a1da9f9ac370d
Abaddon, Gwallan my hat is off to the both of you, excellent points.
@KBM804 - Yes i am engaged to a quite wonderful woman, you may see also her posts here she posts under the name “Grump.”
Now KBM804, you said the following: “Incidentally, I’m the father of three little girls. I spend MY energy trying to make the world a safer, better place for them, and all people. Maybe that would help you understand my absurd position that all human beings are valuable… ”
Now let me ask you a question, would it be right or rather would you stand behind your children speaking out against a media in which women are portrayed as ignorant, worthless, unable to manage even the most simple tasks without asking a man for help? Would you allow a man to slander your daughters and assume them worthless simply because they are women?
If you would answer no, then why loose your venom upon us? Who stand against those who do the very things i have described to us men?
As for the titles placed upon these articles, they are rather shocking and that shock compelled you to read and how can one better spread a message than to have people read it for themselves. The titles then served a purpose and served that purpose well.
- Oldone
November 8th, 2006 at 5:22 pm - IP Man-Hash: eed3bb6a75c47
Hahahaha.
Thrice - Stand and Feel Your Worth
November 8th, 2006 at 7:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: c39aa6c7046da
I will take you more seriously on this when I see you make an equivalent effort to decry womynkind.org (for example) for their publication of, and reverence afforded to, the SCUM (Society for Cutting Up Men) Manifesto. Womynkind is a site ostensibly devoted to advocacy against violence. You can email Nancy Hulse(site owner) here - nhulse@womynkind.org. Bear in mind as you do this that the SCUM Manifesto is compulsory reading in all Womens’ Studies courses. Do something like that and we may begin to believe you are being balanced in your criticisms.
MABTW is reactionary. Nobody is arguing that. It posits that men are better than women rather than hatred of women. However there are countless examples of the hatred of men to be found throughout our entire culture. On the internet. In the media. In our schools. Remember “all men are rapists”? Were you aware that, according to the UN, only men are responsible for global warming? Women don’t even fart apparently! Also, according to the UN, a fourteen year old boy who becomes a smear on the asphalt in Iraq is not counted as a casualty. He’s a combatant regardless simply because he’s got a dick! He’s not even given a number.
Dick does not have permission to present his rants in our universities, on our tellies, in the press. Only hatred of men is permitted therein.
The current “societal phenomena”, courtesy of gender feminism, is that men have NO say on any issue relating to reproduction.
You disgust me. Not only are you attempting to mitigate the murder of children by their mothers you want to make men responsible for those murders committed by women. Pig.
You reference to the Daly and Wilson research is invalid. It simply compares non biological fathers with biological fathers. It says nothing about the gender relativity. In other words it’s a strawman.
Get over it. Women kill far more children than men.
Time you updated you research on testosterone then.
Daniel DeNoon and Maciej Tomaszewski among others have demonstrated that increasing oestrogen levels in men increases aggression while increasing testosterone in women has the same effect. That aggressive men are likely to be relatively deficient in testosterone. It’s looking increasingly as though the balance of various hormones is the cue rather than a simple measure of the level of one hormone.
I believe it was you who said that men are the vast majority of paedophiles. The fact is that in inter-gender and domestic violence women are more abusive than men.
Notably as soon as it was made clear to you that violence is not the sole preserve of men you start to trot out “evolutionary biology”. It’s called “weasel words”. What you have done here is prove conclusively that when women need defending everybody springs to that defence but when men need defending they’re automatically items of disgust. Until you apply the same effort to combating the constant attacks made on men over four decades you are not to be taken seriously.
I’ll sum it up like this. In our culture a woman can rape a twelve year old boy and then demand, successfully, child support from her victim. It’s chivalrous, ignorant twats like yourself who enable this.
November 9th, 2006 at 8:01 am - IP Man-Hash: a0bd2fb809b91
Slight aside:
Normally, I would offer condolences and commiserations, but in this case I can happily offer congratulations to both of you, not, I’m sure, that it’s a recent event.
As usual, I largely agree with the rest of what oldone says. (The extent to which I disagree is trivial and likely largely semantic therefore not worth mentioning).
-wolfe