Women Would Vote for Hitler

A woman voting on anything other than American Idol or her personal favorite type of chocolate is like watching a small child run full speed into a wall. Clearly the fundamentals are understood. The child runs, it’s going somewhere and there’s no doubt about that. The child can run. But very quickly one comes to the understanding that somewhere, somehow, the process has been perverted. Then comes the wall. Then comes the crying.

Women would vote for Hitler. Not because a woman could be talked into buying a catsup Popsicle while she was wearing white gloves, but because women are all fascists.

Don’t believe me? Let’s leave the constant threat of castration out of it for the moment. That makes it a slam dunk in my book, but that’s fine. Women are just “joking” whenever they play fascism card #1.

How about oppressive dictatorship by force or threat of violence?

Anyone who’s married will tell you a lot of things. The first of which will be, “Don’t get fucking married for any reason you dumb shit.” But a likely secondary is that marriage is not a democracy. What is it then?

Marriage is a fascist dictatorship of oppression — and so is any relationship with a woman. Work, professional, “professional”; they’re all the same. If you don’t like the flavor of the Kool-Aid and you want to add some mix, prepare to have a wailing siren of bullshit go off in your ear. That’s assault and that’s oppression. That’s enforcing your opinion through the threat of violence. If you press the issue, prepare to receive the threat of withheld friendship — or even sex whether it’s applicable or not! There was another man who pulled the same kind of shit. Yep, Hitler.

The biggest women/fascism link is a woman’s reliance on violence. Women will be the first to hit during any kind of dispute. It’s not even a percentage. It’s as much of a guarantee as it is that the sun will rise tomorrow. And as men we can all understand that the sun rises because it’s actually a star that our planet rotates around, therefore it is guaranteed to rise. We are able to remove ourselves from our personal point of view and understand that the sun isn’t rising at all. It’s actually us who are spinning around the sun. Women don’t even fucking know that.

Every morning when a woman wakes up at the crack of 10:30 she’s thrilled to shit to see that the sun’s in the sky again and her fake orange tan will look just as radiant as it did yesterday. That’s one of the biggest reasons why women shouldn’t vote. They don’t know fucking anything about anything. They know nothing.

But that’s not why women would vote for Hitler if given the chance. Say what you want about the merits of an individual ethos of governments as you will. You’re all men and therefore deserve the right to express opinion unmitigated by slander or censure. What I’m saying is that by an intrinsic party affiliation — fascist — all women would check the box marked ‘Kill Or Savagely Beat Anyone Who Doesn’t Agree With Me’. That fact has always held women back more than any mythical glass ceiling.

Related Articles:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

2,284 Comments in 2116 threads.»

Pages: « 10698 97 96 95 94 [93] 92 91 90 89 881 » Show All

Comment by no manhole
2008-05-25 05:43:28

Muzalon said:

We know what you and your kind really think.

I am entitling the duplicity of female talk from action as “the Royal Scam”. Also the name of a cool Steely Dan album.

 
Comment by Muzalon
2008-05-25 05:35:00

Well, you and your kind hate men. Why can’t he hate you? You and your kind take pleasure in men being killed or crippled in wars and such. Why can’t he take pleasure in your kind being raped? I don’t ‘get’ this double standard, I really don’t. We know what you and your kind really think. This is a post-feminist world, now: you’re not on a pedestal any more… get used to it.

 
Comment by Run
2008-05-25 03:04:47

doubt said:

manhole said:

[TL;DR]

And there you have it, folks.
Milk = Rape
And manholes wonder why society does not take them seriously.
http://community.livejournal.com/feminist_rage/111904.html?thread=1841 184#t1841184
Sluts are simply asking to be raped. Dumb and disgusting, they deserve to be raped over and over again. About 99.9% of girls who claim to be raped are sluts…it’s like, “Bitch, what did you expect?” We have to teach sluts a lesson about who the superior sex is and rape the shit out of you so that you can learn your lesson. Feminists are also sluts. But rather than just accepting their unfortunate fate and getting on with their lives, feminists will constantly dwell on the “traumatic” event, defining their entire lives by a single bad experience. This is why we need to rape every feminist out there to show them who really controls things and to show them that they’re dumb whores for thinking they can stand up to us. Unfortunately, feminists are typically annoying butthurt mutants and there’s rarely enough alcohol on hand to justify the bestiality. In fact, statistics show that 10 out of 10 men would rather rape a malfunctioning blender.

Mostly, I find this site hilarious.

Everyone’s entitled to their opinion, of course. If this site helps a group of small-minded blokes have a quiet bitch about women without getting it back (whilst giving a few of us something to laugh about) then I’m completely for it.

But you, my friend, have crossed the line. You’re sick. Completely and utterly dead inside your mind.

I live in an area where both men and women are assaulted reguarly. Decent, hard-working people of both sexes that do no more harm that waiting for a late bus. You tell me 10 out of 10 of those assaulters (100% men) would rather rape a blender. Pathetic.

And it’s not just adults. Innocent, young kids. Girls and boys barely out of their cots. Girls like me.

99.9% of girls who claim to be raped are sluts, you say?…

And the girls, they deserve it, do they? The boys, oh no, what an injustice, but the girls, they’re asking for it, the filthy whores…

We don’t get to choose where we grow up. We don’t walk the streets late at night asking to be pushed up against a wall by some twisted pervert.

I’m not going to wish any ill in your life.

You don’t deserve a life.

 
Comment by ...
2008-05-24 23:23:35

Dick Masterson said:

A Woman said:

By the way i believe the computer of the F-22 does most of the work so dont get all high and might just yet.

So says a woman who uses “cherryblossomkitten” as her email address.

-Dick

Wow. Amazing. That is the POOREST offense I have seen yet, Dick. Hah. Wow. We judge people by the names of their emails now, huh? You amaze me, how stupid you get.

 
Comment by doubt
2008-05-24 22:14:13

With a beer in your tits. Wait, they’re too small - send your sister.
By the way, I’ll be out with some girlfriends tonight. Go read romance books or make out with your sister or smoke tampons or whatever other mundane shit you do in your mundane life that I could not care less about.

 
Comment by dbossnirvana
2008-05-24 20:01:46

Kat said:

I personally wouldn’t vote for hitler. Although I am sure that there are some women AND men who would.

Shut the fuck up and give me a blowjob. When you’re done, go fetch me sandwich.

 
Comment by Kevin
2008-05-24 19:26:09

Hey Woman……………………..blow me bitch. I bet youre as stupid as you sound in the letters. Oh yeah, have to be, you’re a woman. We should cut your tits off, you worthless cunt

 
Comment by Kat
2008-05-24 00:47:51

I personally wouldn’t vote for hitler. Although I am sure that there are some women AND men who would.

 
Comment by Muzalon
2008-05-23 19:54:42

This is a nice site:

http://www.neobyzantine.org/orthodoxy/index.php

Their take on the Anglo-American media is very interesting.

 
Comment by Muzalon
2008-05-23 19:50:08

son of the suns said:

Their Emporer did marry a whore..

Justinian. Well, so does every man who marries, I guess…

 
Comment by son of the suns
2008-05-23 18:15:42

Their Emporer did marry a whore..

 
Comment by Commander Scott
2008-05-23 17:50:23

Muzalon said:

Commander Scott said:

stranger said:

Muzalon said:

stranger said:

i think women would make good leaders who ever heard of a women who wants to go to war(some men are also good leaders)
if we give women a chance they could be good for the world

Margaret Thatcher went to war. Women like war because they are exempt from suffering in wartime, while men take all the shit. Women take pleasure in male suffering, torture and death: we have to understand this and treat them accordingly.

what is wrong with you????
are you sick in the head???
i dont think women like men suffering and neither do men like women suffering
but there are a few men and women who are sadists
but all are not the same
dont just classify it into men and women
we are all individuals

All English-speaking women, especially American and Canadian women in particular, possess an innate sadomasochistic psychological pred-disposition. They enjoy watching those they consider beneath their level of dignified bearing suffer. Additionally, women are strongly attracted to physically or economically dominant males; it is these men who often find themselves in the highly advantageous position of being able to exercise the old Roman “paterfamilias” to its fullest extent: they are able to rape, beat, maim, or kill their wives or mistresses without the need to exercise any degree of self-restraint whatsoever and are granted, under any truly patriarchal order, full immunity from adversarial prosecution.

Furthermore, the notion that stereotyping is fundamentally irrational is merely left-wing twaddle from the social constructionist paradigm of the now thoroughly discredited Margaret Mead. It is based on the idea that the human personality (the “blank slate” or “tabula rasa”) is infinitely malleable and, in an act of doublethink typical of Marxist sociological and anthropological analysis, simultaneously denies the existence of anything permanent in human nature. However, the cognitive thought process can only be facilitated through the process of organizing the chaos of data with which we are regularly enveloped into either fluid or static categories. Rational (fluid) stereotyping in the form of constructing a statistical generalization based on the relative probability of trait distribution within a given population demographic enables us to have a more accurate picture of human biodiversity by allowing itself to be evaluated along scientific methodological lines and verified through mathematico-logical analysis, such as plugging the raw data into a Bayesian statistical formula. Thus, if stereotypes are understood as a series of relative generalizations based on varying degrees of probability, then it follows that many of our most cherished prejudices turn out to be true. As a matter of fact, many stereotypes actually reflect the substance of reality with remarkable accuracy. For example, the statement that, in general, human beings have two arms and two legs is a stereotype that is correct on both a logical and an empirical level. Others immediately come to mind: Negroes make excellent athletes and musicians, Jews are overrepresented within the ranks of the world’s great artists and intellectuals, or that Asians, collectively speaking, score higher on tests of psychometric intelligence than all other ethno-racial groups. All of these assertions can be readily evaluated by means of producing a statistical generalization that draws from a wide variety of scientific data and mathematical analysis.

stranger, haven’t you heard that women have smaller brains and lower IQs than men? Mademoiselle, I must confess that you are a cunt life support system in search of a rich man’s limp cock. Why don’t you wrap a noose around your frigid Yankee cunt and hang yourself from an apartment building instead?

‘The Sultan chose to attack the city with 10 000 of his brave young Janissaries, all fighting in the breach with the courage of lions…’

You must be referring to the fall of Constantinople in 1453. The battle-hardened Janissaries simply hastened the inevitable by permanently ending an already soft and effeminate Byzantine culture.

 
Comment by Matt
2008-05-23 09:06:41

stranger said:

i think women would make good leaders who ever heard of a women who wants to go to war(some men are also good leaders)
if we give women a chance they could be good for the world

Funny thing is women kill more babies illegitimately each year than were lost in the American civil war (about 700 000) mainly for economical reasons (i.e. it’s like starting a bloody war because you want more money). Besides, it’s essential for wars to be fought and declared otherwise we’d be living in a German ruled world now wouldn’t we?

 
Comment by Dick Masterson
2008-05-22 22:04:33

A Woman said:

By the way i believe the computer of the F-22 does most of the work so dont get all high and might just yet.

So says a woman who uses “cherryblossomkitten” as her email address.

-Dick

 
Comment by Matt
2008-05-22 21:44:49

Off with the penis! whats with women wanting to cut a mans dick off evertime they can not accept something like the obvious.

 
Comment by A Woman
2008-05-22 21:42:17

A Woman said:

GO F*CK YOURSELF, that was the most disgusting pig thing ive ever seen you deserve to be raped, oh yeah thats right you cant be, ok so how about this lets take a gun or a knife and shoot or cut you on your penis over and over again. Because hey guess what you deserve it right? If you werent so obsessed with sex maybe you might sound intelligent I hope you die a horrible death. This whole website is the opposite of showing men’s superior. IF YOU WERE SO F*CKING SUPERIOR YOU WOULDNT NEED A WEBSITE TO SHOW IT!!!

Thats was to the guy who said women deserved to be raped.

 
Comment by A Woman
2008-05-22 21:39:24

GO F*CK YOURSELF, that was the most disgusting pig thing ive ever seen you deserve to be raped, oh yeah thats right you cant be, ok so how about this lets take a gun or a knife and shoot or cut you on your penis over and over again. Because hey guess what you deserve it right? If you werent so obsessed with sex maybe you might sound intelligent I hope you die a horrible death. This whole website is the opposite of showing men’s superior. IF YOU WERE SO F*CKING SUPERIOR YOU WOULDNT NEED A WEBSITE TO SHOW IT!!!

 
Comment by A Woman
2008-05-22 21:33:39

Muzalon said:

Commander Scott said:

stranger said:

Muzalon said:

stranger said:

i think women would make good leaders who ever heard of a women who wants to go to war(some men are also good leaders)
if we give women a chance they could be good for the world

Margaret Thatcher went to war. Women like war because they are exempt from suffering in wartime, while men take all the shit. Women take pleasure in male suffering, torture and death: we have to understand this and treat them accordingly.

what is wrong with you????
are you sick in the head???
i dont think women like men suffering and neither do men like women suffering
but there are a few men and women who are sadists
but all are not the same
dont just classify it into men and women
we are all individuals

All English-speaking women, especially American and Canadian women in particular, possess an innate sadomasochistic psychological pred-disposition. They enjoy watching those they consider beneath their level of dignified bearing suffer. Additionally, women are strongly attracted to physically or economically dominant males; it is these men who often find themselves in the highly advantageous position of being able to exercise the old Roman “paterfamilias” to its fullest extent: they are able to rape, beat, maim, or kill their wives or mistresses without the need to exercise any degree of self-restraint whatsoever and are granted, under any truly patriarchal order, full immunity from adversarial prosecution.

Furthermore, the notion that stereotyping is fundamentally irrational is merely left-wing twaddle from the social constructionist paradigm of the now thoroughly discredited Margaret Mead. It is based on the idea that the human personality (the “blank slate” or “tabula rasa”) is infinitely malleable and, in an act of doublethink typical of Marxist sociological and anthropological analysis, simultaneously denies the existence of anything permanent in human nature. However, the cognitive thought process can only be facilitated through the process of organizing the chaos of data with which we are regularly enveloped into either fluid or static categories. Rational (fluid) stereotyping in the form of constructing a statistical generalization based on the relative probability of trait distribution within a given population demographic enables us to have a more accurate picture of human biodiversity by allowing itself to be evaluated along scientific methodological lines and verified through mathematico-logical analysis, such as plugging the raw data into a Bayesian statistical formula. Thus, if stereotypes are understood as a series of relative generalizations based on varying degrees of probability, then it follows that many of our most cherished prejudices turn out to be true. As a matter of fact, many stereotypes actually reflect the substance of reality with remarkable accuracy. For example, the statement that, in general, human beings have two arms and two legs is a stereotype that is correct on both a logical and an empirical level. Others immediately come to mind: Negroes make excellent athletes and musicians, Jews are overrepresented within the ranks of the world’s great artists and intellectuals, or that Asians, collectively speaking, score higher on tests of psychometric intelligence than all other ethno-racial groups. All of these assertions can be readily evaluated by means of producing a statistical generalization that draws from a wide variety of scientific data and mathematical analysis.

stranger, haven’t you heard that women have smaller brains and lower IQs than men? Mademoiselle, I must confess that you are a cunt life support system in search of a rich man’s limp cock. Why don’t you wrap a noose around your frigid Yankee cunt and hang yourself from an apartment building instead?

‘The Sultan chose to attack the city with 10 000 of his brave young Janissaries, all fighting in the breach with the courage of lions…’

Ok im going to have to agree with commander scott here, thats pretty f*cked up, I dont believe women enjoy that. And If you do, I think you need to take a leave to a mental institution.

 
Comment by A Woman
2008-05-22 21:30:08

Matt said:

Get the fuck out of here haha. Men are bad at multitasking? Who is up there flying all of the F-22’s and J-10’s? You are horse shit this is mans domain take your ass to the mall, and bring girl girl with you.

You are highly unintelligent. That was the worst example i’ve ever heard of multi-tasking, and if you have nothing better to do then read this crap of reassurance that you are better than a woman? You have a sad, sad life. You will never get a wife or anything, oh and by the way, ive seen more men go to the mall strolling for chicks. So tell me mister superior man if you are so superior why the hell do men look for women all the time? Seems to me that if they dont come to you, you come to them proving your not as superior as you think.

By the way i believe the computer of the F-22 does most of the work so dont get all high and might just yet.

 
Comment by Muzalon
2008-05-22 09:50:12

Commander Scott said:

stranger said:

Muzalon said:

stranger said:

i think women would make good leaders who ever heard of a women who wants to go to war(some men are also good leaders)
if we give women a chance they could be good for the world

Margaret Thatcher went to war. Women like war because they are exempt from suffering in wartime, while men take all the shit. Women take pleasure in male suffering, torture and death: we have to understand this and treat them accordingly.

what is wrong with you????
are you sick in the head???
i dont think women like men suffering and neither do men like women suffering
but there are a few men and women who are sadists
but all are not the same
dont just classify it into men and women
we are all individuals

All English-speaking women, especially American and Canadian women in particular, possess an innate sadomasochistic psychological pred-disposition. They enjoy watching those they consider beneath their level of dignified bearing suffer. Additionally, women are strongly attracted to physically or economically dominant males; it is these men who often find themselves in the highly advantageous position of being able to exercise the old Roman “paterfamilias” to its fullest extent: they are able to rape, beat, maim, or kill their wives or mistresses without the need to exercise any degree of self-restraint whatsoever and are granted, under any truly patriarchal order, full immunity from adversarial prosecution.

Furthermore, the notion that stereotyping is fundamentally irrational is merely left-wing twaddle from the social constructionist paradigm of the now thoroughly discredited Margaret Mead. It is based on the idea that the human personality (the “blank slate” or “tabula rasa”) is infinitely malleable and, in an act of doublethink typical of Marxist sociological and anthropological analysis, simultaneously denies the existence of anything permanent in human nature. However, the cognitive thought process can only be facilitated through the process of organizing the chaos of data with which we are regularly enveloped into either fluid or static categories. Rational (fluid) stereotyping in the form of constructing a statistical generalization based on the relative probability of trait distribution within a given population demographic enables us to have a more accurate picture of human biodiversity by allowing itself to be evaluated along scientific methodological lines and verified through mathematico-logical analysis, such as plugging the raw data into a Bayesian statistical formula. Thus, if stereotypes are understood as a series of relative generalizations based on varying degrees of probability, then it follows that many of our most cherished prejudices turn out to be true. As a matter of fact, many stereotypes actually reflect the substance of reality with remarkable accuracy. For example, the statement that, in general, human beings have two arms and two legs is a stereotype that is correct on both a logical and an empirical level. Others immediately come to mind: Negroes make excellent athletes and musicians, Jews are overrepresented within the ranks of the world’s great artists and intellectuals, or that Asians, collectively speaking, score higher on tests of psychometric intelligence than all other ethno-racial groups. All of these assertions can be readily evaluated by means of producing a statistical generalization that draws from a wide variety of scientific data and mathematical analysis.

stranger, haven’t you heard that women have smaller brains and lower IQs than men? Mademoiselle, I must confess that you are a cunt life support system in search of a rich man’s limp cock. Why don’t you wrap a noose around your frigid Yankee cunt and hang yourself from an apartment building instead?

‘The Sultan chose to attack the city with 10 000 of his brave young Janissaries, all fighting in the breach with the courage of lions…’

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis