Women’s Stories Have No Fucking Point

There’s a myth as old as men’s desire to un-invent pants.

Women’s stories have no fucking point.

While that is a man-fact — meaning it is true as far as a man immediately understands and knows true things to be true without a lot of dicking around with proofs and facts and other such nonsense; it is not a true fact.

The true fact of it is women’s stories have too many points.

Here’s the mathematical formula to determine how many points a woman has in her average story.

First, take the number of sentences in said story. Keep in mind women believe semi-colons, commas, the word ‘and’, and most ruefully the dreaded ellipses to be sentence terminators. That’s why all women write like shit. If you’ve ever read any of the works of E. E. Cummings then you know exactly what I’m talking about. It’s all because women hate periods (for obvious reasons).

Then, take the number of sentences and add like twenty or a thousand to it. That’s the number of points that woman was trying to make in her tirade of bullshit. Ten sentences? That’s a million fucking points right there. Nice.

Here’s another way to tell when a woman is making a point. Sometimes it’s just not convenient to be adding thousands of numbers together while you’re talking to a woman. Instead, watch how her eyes get wider and wider at seemingly random points throughout her unlistenable monologue. Each lid-straining, eyeball-bursting squinch is another alleged point she’s tossing onto the heap like a banana peel on a pile of shit.

Women have no idea what they’re talking about at all times. If you want to argue with a woman about anything — financial matters or parenting tactics, just do a Mad Libs instead and when you’re sick of them go and do whatever the fuck you want.

You’re the man and it’s not your right to do whatever you want, it’s your mother fucking responsibility.

Related Articles:

20 Responses to “Women’s Stories Have No Fucking Point”

  1. Steve Says:

    A common reply to a womens story.

    Man:”whats you point?”

    Woman:”um i was just saying thats all”

    Man:”I see”

  2. Desferal Says:

    Yea, that is too true Steve.

    Too many points or no point at all, its all the same.

    Women still have no idea what they are talking about.

  3. Elitist_Prick Says:

    I don’t understand how women can just vomit words and think that it even resembles what 1 would consider a rational thought half the time… or all the time for that matter.

  4. diamatik Says:

    Elitist_Prick said:

    I don’t understand how women can just vomit words and think that it even resembles what 1 would consider a rational thought half the time… or all the time for that matter.

    And further, why do they think men actually give a shit about what they have to say? What women really need is a pacifier. No, not the little type you give babies, because women have bigger mouths and they cry and wail even more than infants. What women need is a nice big shut-the-fuck-upper, one of those great big pacifiers in my pants.

  5. sonyad Says:

    Oh, so you gots more of ‘em?

  6. diamatik Says:

    That’s why my nickname in school was “the Shark”

  7. sonyad Says:

    I actually had to look up shark anatomy on this one. Bugger can have it out with the misses and the mistress at the same time.

    What a mantastic fish!

  8. diamatik Says:

    Most conversations are simply monologues delivered in the presence of witnesses.
    - Margaret Millar

    So true. When women speak to each other it is exactly like that. Never giving each other a chance to talk. When an ‘empowered’ woman speaks to a man it is the same thing, and men seldom respond because we do not lower ourselves to such levels of stupidity. When a real woman is in the presence of a man, she knows she has nothing proper to contribute to the conversation, so she keeps her trap shut.

    When men are together having a conversation it’s a beautiful thing. Both sides get to present their opinions on the issue being discussed, and it raises the general level of knowledge and understanding to all concerned.

    As a matter of fact, formal debates never needed to have rules until the advent of feminism, when women felt the need to have their views heard (and by that I mean theirs alone).

  9. Gabriella LaPlace Says:

    She was just trying to bond with you. That’s the reason why she’s telling you the story. She’s sharing with you : Her feelings, Her emotions. Contrastingly, men bond through shared activity.

  10. Billy Says:

    No she was attention whoring like you are.
    Now bug off.

    Gabriella LaPlace said:

    She was just trying to bond with you. That’s the reason why she’s telling you the story. She’s sharing with you : Her feelings, Her emotions. Contrastingly, men bond through shared activity.

    Her feelings and emotions? Those are only useful to an attention whore. Irrelevant to any real conversation. The only real bonding a woman can do is the bond of her mouth around his point of interest.
    Now bug off.

  11. Gabriella LaPlace Says:

    Well, I think you should go to http://www.askmen.com it’s a much better site than this one. It’s not nonsensical.

  12. sonyad Says:

    diamatik said:

    [...]
    As a matter of fact, formal debates never needed to have rules until the advent of feminism, when women felt the need to have their views heard (and by that I mean theirs alone).

    Too true. Thankfully, to homo sapiens sapiens, hearing is not the same with listening.

    - The Drill - The Drill (Paolo Bolognesi Remix)

  13. PhD Says:

    the title of your article should be “Angry Child Complains About the Mother-figure He has Chained in his Basement.” your comments (and those of the men who responded) are vitriolic, bitter and act as a showcase for your fear and ignorance. furthermore, research shows that this kind of woman-bashing is dangerously inflammatory; imoh, the women (if any) in your lives should RUN, fast and far.

    i’m guessing all you guys have at least one thing (besides your anger) in common.

  14. wolfe Says:

    Project much, PhD?
    -wolfe

  15. diamatik Says:

    PhD said:

    i’m guessing all you guys have at least one thing (besides your anger) in common.

    Good guess! All of us are men, and we all know that men are better than women.

  16. Talon Says:

    PhD said:

    the title of your article should be “Angry Child Complains About the Mother-figure He has Chained in his Basement.”

    But that would be stupid. And misleading.

    A woman said:
    your comments (and those of the men who responded) are vitriolic, bitter and act as a showcase for your fear and ignorance.

    Argumentum ad hominem.
    Fear? So because he is making a bold statement, posting a website free for ANYONE to read, recieves lots of hatemail and personal attacks from people like you as a result of stating something politically uncoorect (and arguing his case very nicely), essentially shouting “screw you” to feminists, he is afraid and ignorant?
    Would you like to buy a vowel?

    A woman said:
    furthermore, research shows that this kind of woman-bashing is dangerously inflammatory; imoh, the women (if any) in your lives should RUN, fast and far.

    What “research” would that be? And even IF you can find something to support your claim, it goes both ways.
    vowel
    i’m guessing all you guys have at least one thing (besides your anger) in common.
    And lets round off the smear campaing with a huge global generalization, shall we?

    For someone pointing to research, you sure do not argument very well.

    I refer to the laws of women.

  17. Talon Says:

    Whoops. Exchange

    vowel
    i’m guessing all you guys have at least one thing (besides your anger) in common.
    And lets round off the smear campaing with a huge global generalization, shall we?

    For someone pointing to research, you sure do not argument very well.

    I refer to the laws of women.

    with:

    PhD said:
    i’m guessing all you guys have at least one thing (besides your anger) in common.

    And lets round off the smear campaing with a huge global generalization, shall we?

    For someone pointing to research, you sure do not argument very well.

    I refer to the laws of women.

  18. Hilary Says:

    If womens stories have no point then Dick has something in common with women

  19. KL Says:

    Billy, stop acting like you don’t have feelings and emotions tough guy.

  20. Monica Says:

    E. E. Cummings was a man, actually.

Leave a Reply


Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis