A Woman’s Version of Self-Reliance
A woman with self-reliance is like a bowling ball rolling down the street. You don’t need to pay attention to it unless it’s your bowling ball or your car in the way. If either of those are true, get your running shoes on or your credit card out. You’re about to pay for a fuck up.
No matter how many signs there are in front of an out of control bowling ball — telling it to turn around, shut the fuck up, or not return the calls of a guy who will only let it see his penis in the dark — the bowling ball won’t notice. Bowling balls are as dense as trash-compacted shit.
So are women.
Women and bowling balls will destroy anything in their path to satisfy their compulsive greed. Women crave attention and bowling balls crave speed; both will destroy lives, children, and their marriage to get more. Women are unlike bowling balls because no matter how drunk you get a bowling ball, you can’t fuck it. Like mine, your dick is way too big.
A woman’s version of self-reliance is fucking up so much on her own, she doesn’t have to ask for help. Someone has to physically force “help” up her metaphysical ass.
Women don’t have the man-brains suited for problem solving like men do. That’s why women have only invented like two things and neither was something that had a compass on it for convenience. What the fuck would a woman ever need with a compass? They don’t even know how to use them.
“Does the direction pointing at me tell me which way I’m going?”
That depends. Does it point to Retard Town?
A woman with “self-reliance” is one who is in denial and locked into a life-long scavenger hunt with no clue what her first mystery item even looks like.
1. Competence.
All a woman has to do to solve a problem is open her mouth. That’s where the old saying comes from, “A man in time saves nine.” Like when a woman doesn’t ask her husband if it’s safe to back out of a parking space at 20 miles an hour with platform sandals haphazardly on her feet and whilst on a cell phone — or when she doesn’t ask a man what it means to “make a right when the fucking internet directions say to make a right?”
A man in time saves nine.
Women who are “self-reliant” are really just silent time-bombs of cluster fuck, waltzing around making problems big enough for ten men when one man could have fixed it easily by himself an hour ago. When it comes to a full-fledged fuck up like a rear tire that is now a backseat, or dinner reservations that are now off by an hour, ten men have to fix it.
One man could have fixed either in the first place by not letting a woman drive. That’s a loss of Man Points.
Women are as obsessed with self-reliance as Dumbo was with his magic feather. The only difference between women and Dumbo is that in order to make Dumbo fly, we have to suspend our disbelief. In order to make women independent, we have to put Starbucks on every corner so they can’t possibly get lost, make everything free including loans and credit cards, and reverse numbers so that “children raised by single mothers are eight times more likely to go to prison” actually means “less likely”.
Just look at all those school shootings. According to prison statistics, those would have been less likely to happen if those children had been raised by single men. Women can’t even be reliant properly.
Related Articles:
Pages: [10] 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 » Show All
I am shutting this site down.
Even man-science says that children fare better raised by single fathers than single mothers but of course, everything is politically corrected in the woman’s favour. God forbid a woman does something right.
Keep them coming Dick, even if you are joking (which I’m certain most of the time you’re not) as the saying goes, many a true word said in jest.
He makes my day. Yes I’m a woman and I’m loving this. Why?
Because it’s so obvious that he isn’t serious.
It’s utterly impossible for a human being to survive being as low on IQ as he makes himself out to be.
He has yet to make a single valid point – he basically just rants on and on trying to be as offensive as possible. There is NO LOGICAL STRUCTURE or intelligent thought process present WHATSOEVER.
Surely when you consider Darwin’s evolution of species – “survival of the fittestâ€? – it becomes crystal clear that if he genuinely lacked mental faculties to this extent he would have long ago accidentally and brutally killed himself.
If he is serious, then he must have spent his entire life under a rock with absolutely no educational, cultural, or social contact. He gives himself away, of course, with his fairly evolved vocabulary.
This leads us to the obvious conclusion that he is NOT to be taken seriously!!
He’s quite the smart businessman – he has discovered that saying the stupidest and most offensive possible things he can think of, with absolutely no proof, logic, or sensible arguments, gets a HUGE rise out of people, especially when he directs it at half of the world’s population.
I salute you, Dick, for being secretly so smart. You’re infamous, you’ve been on TV, things you’ve probably dreamed of all your life.
It’s just too bad that in the process you’ve made yourself out to be pitied scum and now tens of thousands of people would leap at the opportunity to decapitate you.
:)
The only thing that’s terrifying is all the gullible foolish young men that take him seriously and so enthusiastically side with him… you are definitely committing social suicide. With an M-32.
Dick may not be quite as smart a businessman as you thought Alexis. You see feminists long ago found that saying the stupidest and most offensive possible with absolutely no proof, logic, or sensible arguments, gets a HUGE rise out of people, especially when they direct it at half of the world’s population.
Alexis, do you really believe that women today have a achieved a permanent level of status in society? If you do you are very, very wrong. Feminists claiming to represent all woman have been waging a war against the family unit and men for the last 30 years. At first it was tolerable but as over the decades pass and law is layered upon initiative, upon law. Well let’s say now they are genuinely hurting many men, too many for others to ignore.
Men are getting in the mood to fight back!
I believe the metaphorical ‘battle of the sexes’ has yet to be fought and I can assure you, women will regret ever starting it.
If childbirth is the primary function of women, fighting is the primary function of man. Be that prey, rivals or enemies in fact anything that gets in his way. Over thousands of years he has become rather good at it.
Truly, men now have become ‘Gods of War’ – in all forms of warfare.
I’m not joking. Allow me to present the evidence. Men imagined, designed and built thermonuclear weapons, predator drones, nuclear attack submarines. He trained his body and mind to the utmost to become the perfect warrior. We call those arts Kung-Fu or Ninjitsu, boxing. That’s to say nothing of the tools he imagined and built such as katanas, sniper-rifles, SAMs or Mini-guns.
Men fight good!
Men dreamt and perfected torture, propaganda and marketing (Oh yes! marketing is most certainly a form of warfare)
Men fight very good!
…and that’s the ‘gender’ feminists want to rile-up and fight, they would have better luck fighting against salt-water crocodiles using only high-heeled shoes!
Men are beginning to realise women have snatched power from them but have completely forgotten that it comes with RESPONSIBILITY. If women can’t take responsibility, and they never do; PMS, ‘battered wives syndrome’, ‘preg-head’, ‘I think with my heart’. Then they should not have authority, it’s not right and not fair!
Simple.
More and more men are beginning to see that, they are getting angry.
Men coming through domestic courts, they too are getting angry.
This anger is building. Every ‘positive discrimination action’, every ‘record divorce settlement’, every ‘woman given millions for hurt feelings’, every woman that gets an easy ride in the courts makes this anger burn that much more fiercely. It is fuel on the fire.
I don’t see blood on the street but I do see a social/political war looming, one that women will obviously lose. It will happen under the guise of something like an Anglo-Christian moral resurgence, I’m just guess there, but change is coming. It’s inevitable.
The real irony is that women like usemenonly and you, Alexis, are speeding the change along by antagonising the men on this site – most amusing!
“The real irony is that women like usemenonly and you, Alexis, are speeding the change along by antagonising the men on this site – most amusing!”
Spot on, Watcher!
While I would never waste actual pearls on reality-denying swine, I’m not completely averse to giving even the dumbest of bitches – for example, usemensmoney – an occasional pat on the head while tossing them a biscuit (their posts DO MORE to prove our and Dick’s points than even we can. Now THAT is ironically amusing!).
*New York City, 1982 – feminist Brenda Berkman “successfully” sues the city, resulting in firefighter tests being modified, physical standards lowered, and the cheering of the “We can do anythiiiing a man can do!” crowd
(this isn’t uncommon – where female firefighters exist, they are VERY FEW in number, and/or the standards to pass them have been MODIFIED – remember: Feeeeeeeeelings are much more important than public safety!!!).
*The “Family” Court system – NOT debatable, the FACT that whimmin receive special treatment, by design (therefore, MEN are systemically discriminated against).
*Whimmin disrespecting the WRITTEN wishes (rule of “No Women Allowed”) by ONLY ONE man, Dick Masterson – the evidence lies all over this site (imagine these harpies in real life; and expand this problem to all those proximal).
WhimminsVersionOfSelfReliance-”BecauseIFeeeeelThatWay!”
Men dreamt and perfected torture,
Watcher all but one form of torture, prolonged nagging.
The real irony is that women like usemenonly and you, Alexis, are speeding the change along by antagonising the men on this site – most amusing!
Very amusing. Just a matter of time girls, your greed will be your own undoing.
I find the the logic in your conclusions dubious at best. This is not to say you are wrong, but the logic arriving at such a conclusion seems flawed since it is all ad hominem postulates.
If it were just personal I wouldn’t be posting comments.
”Very amusing. Just a matter of time girls, your greed will be your own undoing.”
Women constantly accuse and berate the men that are ruining the environment, oil, timber etc. Yet they feed the need for it, far more than men do.
Stop going after women, then you won’t be so hung up a frustrated.
You will be fullfilled.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTasT5h0LEg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZAHl5_LTGQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3U0udLH974
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NSsa_-GaVhY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Es52WQKLumI
You replied to an post about “self reliant’ women by posting links to cat videos?
So I assume when an asteroid is threatening the Earth, we don’t have to call you for advice?
Federal taxes?
http://www.freetalklive.com – a free radio against federal goverment stealing your hard earned money. (Sorry if links irritate you, Dick. <3 )
“Just look at all those school shootings.”
They prefer to blame the gun; which was sitting in a drawer doing nothing until the Degenerate, raised by a single mom, grabbed it.
Makes no sense, but it avoids accountability and The Truth. Which women avoid like the plague. It always makes them look dumb. Because they are.
Amen! A fresh breeze of common, good sense! It take two to bring a child into the world. The only crime is not taking proper responsibility for it, and involving talk show hosts and an audience while it plays in traffic.
This comment is a lighthouse.
Okay, your completely contradictory. In many articles you state that a woman in the workplace is useless and stupid so she basically shouldn’t even bother to be self-reliant, but you complain at her for not being self-reliant and taking money from you for the child YOU fathered. Wow, your really not going to give as an opening, we can never do right to you, because according to you a woman is born wrong! Your pathetic!
Those last two words?
Should be “you’re pathetic”.
As in ‘You Are’ Pathetic.
I know that part of the English language is hard to grasp.
Maybe you should write it down?
Can you provide medical evidence to support that theory? Or are you just making shit up?
Actually, that’s only half true. Alcohol is a diuretic, and yes, it will dehydrate you. However, beer contains MUCH more water in it than it does alcohol. A single beer has virtually no dehydration effect on the body. In fact, alcohol is actually healthy for the body in small doses. It helps regulate the digestion amongst other things.
The problem occurs when someone drinks 4 or 5 beers. Then the diuretic effect causes the body to expel much of it’s moisture in the form of urinating, thus, dehydrating you. (That’s why you have to pee when your drink alcohol than when you drink water.)
*laughs hard* So what? What does that have to do with anything? Why would you even tell us that? What point were you trying to make?
I just see it as further proof that women think about sex all the god damn time.
Its just the custom- people come up with reasons to validate it, but when it comes down to it (best for the kids, legally, etc.) they jsut do it because they think that’s what they are supposed to be doing- All the legal “benifits” like rights (power of attorney, heir) can be given to a partner or parent without marriage- you just have to make the extra effort, but it’s not a big deal. This is in my State in the US anyway.
From some of the posts earlier on here, it sounds like it’d actually really be easy to ACCIDENTALLY marry someone- especially in fucking Canada!! my God!
I don’t see the big deal about marriage anyway…to me it just seems like a long term relationship, except now its a legal thing…which when u say outta loud..isnt as romantic…
@ meaningreen- I just went back and read all the comments I wrote- and I sound really confused- I must be. All the more reason for me and women like me to stay away from marriages. I’m presently being unbrainwashed which may take decades.
But as a side note, I bet there are a lot of women who fuck up marriages – not because of feminism, but because they feel the same way I do- fear/resentment of the idea of losing their freedom. In their thoughts, that might morph itself into the idea of being oppressed I guess- for the sake of giving it a name, if they can’t understand the real source of those feelings. I hear this idea buried in conversations with women a lot- I don’t point it out though, because what good could really come of that?
- But the weird thing is, they all still buy into that idea of marriage that everyone is out their promoting- Not sure what that is all about- Another example of women being confused, maybe- just taking what people are selling and not stopping to think if its what they really want or if they’d be any good at it… Everyone is promoting this thing, and nobody can fucking do it anyway- so I think maybe we should all just calm down. Your chances are less that heads or tails with it. Plus, you have to trust the other person with (& for) the rest of your life – that can’t be a good idea, can it?
I don’t think that at all. I know some men that are great husbands. I just think for me personally, it might not be the best thing.
Are you the guy whose girlfriend got him to help move her across the country and then started acting crazy?
Nothing wrong with that, you don’t see me married at the moment, and thank god I didn’t ask my whore ex to marry due to recent events.
Not wanting to give up your freedom is not the same thing as believing that marrage will cause you to be oppressed by your partner.
Your freedom should not be limited in marrage by your partner but by what is in the best interests of the union.
my objection to your stance on marrage was not about freedom, but your assumption that marrage goes hand in hand with female oppression which is feminist BS
Not wanting to get married because you value your freedom and independance is not the same as not wanting to get married because you think that after the reception you are going to be subjigated.
ok- I am familiar with that setting- I have put my arm in a cows vagina to artificially inseminate her by the way- I dated a guy who did it as his job, and sometimes I went with him. I have also seen some calves get cranked out of its mom with one of those calf cranker machines- I could deal with that on a regular basis, no problem.
I’m probably just really immature and not like the idea of signing away my freedom- at least I can admit that, ok?
in Alabama if the females uses the mans name, it’s common law. If you take care of a woman for a few years is alimony time.
If she is pregnant.. It’s common law and potential assrape time.
Prenups are worthless once kids are born.
if you go to a farm with a traditional family living on it, things are the same as they have been for hundreds of years, other than modern equipment,
Feminists claim the farmer’s wife is opressed… the farmers wife would never consider themself such as they both do what is needed as needed, and dominance/submissiveness never comes into it…
knowing some of these ladies, I would have to say they are the more enlightened and closest to man thinking of any I have met. Bored, spoiled suburban wives and angry man hating lesbians who have never had to muck out the chicken coop, or reach up to the armpit into a cow to help with a birthing, are the ones pushing the feminism movement.
Equality already existed for the most part in the form of mutual respect, what is being pushed as women’s rights these days is not about equality, it is about making women a privledged class over men.
Looking at divorce, everything is done backwards.
the more finacially secure parent be granted custody regardless of sex. There should be a burden of proof that a parent is not suitable before custody can be removed.
The initator of divorce should never ever be granted alimony as the drop in standard of living is directly attributable to their choice to leave.
If the duties of the homemaker are equal to half the finacial income of the household, then alimony doesn’t make sense since they are no longer providing that service to the household on their leaving.
The only time I think it might be reasonable is when the initiating party of the divorce is the sole provider. Even then it should not extend any longer than employment insurance would. If women want to claim homemaker as a ligitimate career on par with a job outside the home, then treat it as one.
Actually I kinda like that one… get rid of alimony and enroll homemakers into employment insurance as earning 1/2 what the sole provider makes. in my case it would work out to be 39 dollars a month.
You can only claim EI if you are laid off, fired, or quit under duress (you have to provide proof) so this would fit right in with my thoughts on the matter
Paying sales tax on a used vehicle everytime it is sold.
Being required as a citizen to pay employment insurance, yet not being able to claim it as a member of the military.
Inheritance tax
Governments can and will take what is not fought for by the general public.
Lol…now 50 cents P.I.M.P reminds me off a Dick…lol
This was said BEAUTIFULLY and this is what I honestly reckon.