A Woman’s Version of Self-Reliance
A woman with self-reliance is like a bowling ball rolling down the street. You don’t need to pay attention to it unless it’s your bowling ball or your car in the way. If either of those are true, get your running shoes on or your credit card out. You’re about to pay for a fuck up.
No matter how many signs there are in front of an out of control bowling ball — telling it to turn around, shut the fuck up, or not return the calls of a guy who will only let it see his penis in the dark — the bowling ball won’t notice. Bowling balls are as dense as trash-compacted shit.
So are women.
Women and bowling balls will destroy anything in their path to satisfy their compulsive greed. Women crave attention and bowling balls crave speed; both will destroy lives, children, and their marriage to get more. Women are unlike bowling balls because no matter how drunk you get a bowling ball, you can’t fuck it. Like mine, your dick is way too big.
A woman’s version of self-reliance is fucking up so much on her own, she doesn’t have to ask for help. Someone has to physically force “help” up her metaphysical ass.
Women don’t have the man-brains suited for problem solving like men do. That’s why women have only invented like two things and neither was something that had a compass on it for convenience. What the fuck would a woman ever need with a compass? They don’t even know how to use them.
“Does the direction pointing at me tell me which way I’m going?”
That depends. Does it point to Retard Town?
A woman with “self-reliance” is one who is in denial and locked into a life-long scavenger hunt with no clue what her first mystery item even looks like.
1. Competence.
All a woman has to do to solve a problem is open her mouth. That’s where the old saying comes from, “A man in time saves nine.” Like when a woman doesn’t ask her husband if it’s safe to back out of a parking space at 20 miles an hour with platform sandals haphazardly on her feet and whilst on a cell phone — or when she doesn’t ask a man what it means to “make a right when the fucking internet directions say to make a right?”
A man in time saves nine.
Women who are “self-reliant” are really just silent time-bombs of cluster fuck, waltzing around making problems big enough for ten men when one man could have fixed it easily by himself an hour ago. When it comes to a full-fledged fuck up like a rear tire that is now a backseat, or dinner reservations that are now off by an hour, ten men have to fix it.
One man could have fixed either in the first place by not letting a woman drive. That’s a loss of Man Points.
Women are as obsessed with self-reliance as Dumbo was with his magic feather. The only difference between women and Dumbo is that in order to make Dumbo fly, we have to suspend our disbelief. In order to make women independent, we have to put Starbucks on every corner so they can’t possibly get lost, make everything free including loans and credit cards, and reverse numbers so that “children raised by single mothers are eight times more likely to go to prison” actually means “less likely”.
Just look at all those school shootings. According to prison statistics, those would have been less likely to happen if those children had been raised by single men. Women can’t even be reliant properly.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 10 9 8 7 6 [5] 4 3 2 1 » Show All
Do you think its funny when a chick comes on here claiming people here are “fags”? Just wondering, especially considering “dike” is an offensive term for a lesbian. Just wanna know if your hypocritical in that sense.
And my country is BEAUTIFUL. I love it dearly. Im gonna be honest, I dont like people talking negatively about my country, but since Im assuming your only contact with Aussies have been some people on this site, I can understand. But just so you know, its wrong. We are some of the nicest people you’ll ever meet.
I don’t know what ur problem is, I didnt do anything to that fella. He’s so rude, I mean, Im not the one making obscene comments making light humour of a “retarded girl getting ass raped.” I just wanted to know why he chose that name, and he went on a tirade about how Im a “dike”, and how he is smarter then me…what the hell?
you are completely right… I guess either I reversed the “ro” subconsciously all this time, or the novels I’ve seen it written in write it as I put it.
Still doesn’t change the fact the twit is a waste of resources
I’m still waiting for a women to explain to me how my hands are filthy if I touch my penis which I wash in the morning when I shower and in the evening when I finish work ( I have a dirty job ) when all it comes into contact with is urine which is pretty much a disinfectant/cleaner, sweat, and cotton/poly blend boxers…
what exactly is so dirty about it? especially since I usually have to wash my hands BEFORE I touch it.
and if it is soooo filthy, why is it ok for a woman to suck on it later?
I don’t understand how it can be safe to suck on yet your hands must be treated like they are contaminated with sewage for just touching it…
I think it’s the whole “Sex is filthy and evil, therefore sexual organs are filthy and evil” mindset that causes this crap. get over it, it’s just a lump of flesh like any other.
do you wash your hands immediatly after touching say, money? ie if you buy a sandwich do you immediatly wash your hands before eating it? Money is one of the most filthy objects you can come into contact with, far filthier than a penis could ever be.
..
…not that I feel the need to test my luck here, buuuuuuut..
Isn’t it Maelstrom? I mean, for all accounts, and so that no body gets the wrong idea- I think she’s a useless excuse for a human being, and gives a bad name to the human race, not just females. However, Maelstrom means a powerful whirlpool, right? It is derived from the Dutch word ‘maalstroom’, which means grinding stream..
Although, there is a game called Maelstorm, on the market- I can only hazard a guess that that was not what she had intended, but really, she meant ‘maelstrom’. Some sort of self-worth thing, no doubt.
..
I resent that..!
This site just seems to have attracted every single derro under the sun, namely Maelstrom. Please, don’t let that cloud your opinion of Australians as a whole, shit.
I must say, a lot of Australian males, disagree with this site, and its content. I don’t pretend to know that many Australian males, but rather it’s been surveyed, people have asked questions- because it seems ever so popular in America-Land. At the very same time though, none of them would ever feel compelled to come on here, just to litter the place with their opposing views… when the site is obviously something they don’t care for- why bother?? Their ability to not have to speak 24/7 is a good reason why MABTW.
Not only that, but this site seems to have attracted the worst sample of Australian females I’ve ever come across, in my few years, in this country. Some true, back alley, one horse country town, ocker speaking females.
I have a feeling that Maelstrom is just pretending to be that stupid. Since being that stupid and being able to operate a keyboard to any extent… well… just don’t go together. Or perhaps he/she has eaten a few keys off of it already?
Neandertalman why do you hate women? Do you hate dogs because they can’t speak English or do trig? They are what they are. The key is keeping your expectations realistic and feminism is what’s fucking up those expectations for most people. Of course, tv shows aren’t helping, either. Expecting anything to do something that it’s incapable of and then getting mad at it because it can’t do it is just foolish.
From what I’ve gathered about this site is that it’s about setting up the proper expectations and dispelling myths about women being superior or entitled to extra rights/privileges just because they are women. It’s not about hate.
Sophia, look at this page, then shut the fuck up.
http://www.glennsacks.com/source_page.htm
*D3C*
Women are going to be responsible for the end of the human race.
Women touch “dirty” penis, Women put on Anti-Bacterial goopy shit that smells bad, Anti-Bacterial turns innocent little penis bacteria into deadly superbug, women bitch that they keep getting colds, humanity dies.
Sophia, if you looked at the references for the site you quoted you’d see that most of the material the findings are based on come from the 1992 - 1999 timeframe which puts it in exactly the same timeline as Mark’s references…..
On this: “”…65 percent of the maltreated children had been maltreated by a female, whereas 54 percent had been maltreated by a male.” This last statistic is unfair because it includes child neglect, in which mothers are named at rates that are absurd given that women accused of child neglect are almost always single mothers. The fathers who abandon their children are almost never convicted of child neglect. ”
Isn’t that nice creative editing. You’re making a huge leap there. You’re assuming that abusive mothers are single mothers. You’re assuming that abusive single mothers aren’t single by choice. You’re assuming that fathers have abandoned these abusive single mothers, and you’re assuming that they have also abandoned their children. You’re also assuming that these fathers; if they chose to would be allowed to protect their children, or that their presence would help to prevent the abuse.
Nearly two thirds of divorce are initiated by women, and as Mark stated, nearly half of children living with their mothers have been prevented from seeing their fathers by their mothers.
| *Posts a new sign*
|
|
V
DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS
———
TNRC
———
Your contant ad hominem arguments to support your foundationless point of view do not evince a high level of maturity either. Keep at it though, it’s fun to watch.
Ugh, Mark, your such an idiot.
Of course practicality trumps theory, feild work after calculations. Why do you think once you learn a scientific THEORY, your true knowledge is tested when you APPLY it to your lab work and actually PRACTICE it. You don’t just jot numbers and figures and say, well, it works in theory. Your life right now, all theory. Where is the real lab work? Stop living and hiding behind the work and life of others. It speaks nothing of you.
What you are saying is that reading about life is more real than living it. Whew, what a sad, sad pathetic way to live. BTW, Dr. Phil and Oprah are TOTALLY banking because of this. And it will be a win-win situation when I stop logging on to this site. You won’t have to be bothered to think, er, uhm, by me. And I won’t be adding to Dick’s clicker (ie, there goes his hopes to finally selling real ad space.)
HERE ARE THE REAL STATS. AGAIN:
“Those who had been physically abused by other parents or parent- substitutes were much more likely to have been abused by their fathers or father-substitutes (90% by their fathers versus 19% by their mothers).” On the whole, children are somewhat more likely to be maltreated by female perpetrators than by males: “65 percent of the maltreated children had been maltreated by a female, whereas 54 percent had been maltreated by a male.” This last statistic is unfair because it includes child neglect, in which mothers are named at rates that are absurd given that women accused of child neglect are almost always single mothers. The fathers who abandon their children are almost never convicted of child neglect. Still, the statistic shows the current state of affairs.”
And I assure you, these stats are not 15-20 yrs old like yours. Ugh, don’t you see how shoddy your stance seems when you use such dated sources? Do you really think NOTHING has changed in that long?
And what precisely are you attempting to prove with your antiquated numbers concerning visitation? Relate one to the other. Make a coherent segway. It would only probe me to ask what the reasons behind such interferences are in these cases. Unless you tell me what exactly you are trying to prove, I will not attempt to engage this point.
BW, if you actually think flipping back to the index of some old book and typing up the appropriate stats is “pounding me to the ground,” pfft! Ha! Do not go into law. They eat you up and spit you out before you can type your keywords into the google search bar or flip into your handy-dandy index. You really don’t know which way is up or done! You go around swinging a big sword clumsily and loudly without at all knowing it’s real use or how to finesse it.
I would guess you are somewhere in your teens. At least you come across that way….hahahahah. I think some cool new video games are finally out at Circuit City you may want to check into.
I am happy you think your personal experience is actually some sort of indication of how the larger populace operates. I mean, it’s deluded, but atleast you have a good notion of self-importance, Dr. Phil would be proud.
Then again, that’s typical female behavior to think the world only exists in what you have personally seen. That’s why you’ll go on praising your gender and continue spouting the generic Feminist template that females actually accomplish something to further the advancement of humanity. If we could all live in our fabricated dreamworlds like you, I’m sure a lot less people would be taking Prozac.
“Most child abuse and parental murder of children is committed by mothers, not fathers.”
“Children are 88% more likely to be seriously injured from abuse or neglect by their mothers than by their fathers. ”
-Source: US Department of Health
So no, it doesn’t come from this site. And you pointing out that most cases of “child neglect” comes from single mothers just shows that women can’t raise children. Single fathers are not being charged with child neglect hardly at all. Also, since when does “Single Mothers” only account for cases when the father “abandoned” them? It also accounts for couples that are divorced and have children. Oh, speaking of which.
Access and Visitation Denial Three-quarters of divorced fathers surveyed maintain that their ex-spouses have substantially interfered with their visitation rights.Source: Joyce A. Arditti, “Factors Related to Custody, Visitation, and Child Support for Divorced Fathers: An Exploratory Analysis,” Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 17, 1992, pp. 34, 39. A study of children of divorce found that 42% of children who lived solely with their mother reported that their mother tried to prevent them from seeing their fathers after the divorce. However, only 16% of children who lived solely with their father reported similar obstruction. Source: Glynnis Walker, Solomon’s Children: Exploding the Myths of Divorce (New York: Arbor House, 1986), p. 83Source: Cathy Young, Ceasefire!: Why Women and Men Must Join Forces to Achieve True Equality, The Free Press, 1999, p. 209.
I guess I could pound you into the ground all day long, but I have no intention of continuing to throw pearls before swine.
Haha, awesome.
No wonder I haven’t posted lately– these dumb broads give any other woman on here (misogynist or not) a bad name.
Also, may I suggest that once you guys get the woman filter, make sure it works extra effective for Australia. Damn, they’re fucking annoying.
This reminds me of one of my fourth grade teacher’s tirades. Ah, sweet memories of childhood. Incidentally, I wouldn’t bother pretending you care about fathers, your beautiful boyfriend, dead boys, or the definition of real men. Clearly these are all unreal objects to you, though you seem to have spent a lot of time “thinking” about them. It’s interested how angry and faux-strong you came on. What are you trying to do? Scream me into believing in you? I smell dependency…
Clair this place intrigues you because you like to watch men suffer
you’re a dike its ok
Thanks Billy I’ve been getting tag teamed ManVoigina, Clare and Zardoz!
DICK ! WE NEED YOU ! THE MEN ARE TURNING ON MEN !
Billy, it wasn’t very ignorant. Its obvious i know im spelling wrong , but i genuinely thought that he may have spelled it wrong accidentally.
OH Clair you stupid imbecile you use the words UR adn URself but correct Neandertal. How ignorant of you.
You should use Clare instead of Clair but then again you really should just fukkoff.. Note:spelling may be adjusted for effect..
women suck as people
That last comment was just odd. It says alot about you…
Anyway, Im just here, like I said, coz this place intrigues me. Its very different. and after talking to some really nice people, they explained to me things i’ve never even really thought of. its a whole new world to me.
but if its all the same to you, id rather not engage in any form of discourse with you. I’d rather not interact in any way with someone that can say/type something like that and intend to disturb the receiver - with nothing but a malice motive.