All Women Hate Guns
Guns are awesome. In fact, a gun is the manliest thing there is.
I take that back. The manliest thing there is would be a hot car or some kind of super motorcycle with guns attached to it. In that case, it’s a case of chicken and egg. Is the car manlier because of the guns or are the guns manlier because of the car? What about a tank? Where does it play into this manly game?
Wherever the fuck it wants. It’s a tank.
All men like guns and think they’re the greatest thing that has ever happened to man-humanity. Did you know that without guns 99% of people would be slaves? Guns ended slavery and that’s 100% true.
Before the invention of the gun, mankind lived in a feudal society. I have seen the film Braveheart many times and I become more and more certain each time I see it that feudal life was fucked. You can thank guns for the end of that dicketry.
As a man, it is only natural you thank things for what they’ve done for you. If you were a woman, you would have to figure out some way to have sex with the invention of the gun. That’s the only way women show their gratitude: lackluster sex.
Oh wait, I’m just kidding because all women hate guns and would never thank them.
Like most everything that’s good for them, women hate guns. It could be because they’re loud. Women hate loud things don’t they? Things like fun parties, and football games, and little yappy, worthless dogs that give them an excuse to refer to themselves as “mommy” about six years too soon. No, that can’t be it. Maybe women hate guns because they’re complicated — guns mind you. Not women. Women are as simple broken vending machines. No matter what you put into them, you don’t get anything you want.
Guns have moving parts and require care-taking. Recently, I heard a female comedian say vaginas are complicated though, so that’s probably not the reason. I could hear her saying it crystal clear too because no one was laughing.
The truth is that women enjoy being in danger. That’s why they hate guns. Guns are safe so women hate them. It’s logic. Without guns you, me, and everyone in the world would be on constant alert for the Hun Alarm that would jolt us out of bed in the middle of the night and let us eloquently know our whole town was about to get burned to the goddamn ground.
Thank guns and thank your man military that doesn’t happen.
That’s also why women love safety belts so much. Safety belts are dangerous just like guns aren’t. They make women drive like chimpanzees on speed with absolutely no regard for anyone’s personal safety. Have you ever seen a woman drive without a safety belt? No. And you’ve never seen a woman drive worth a shit.
I rest my case.
Related Articles:
October 30th, 2006 at 11:56 am - IP Man-Hash: 6897e3ddf8ad0
Nice english, woman.
-Dick
November 2nd, 2006 at 12:40 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Go figure.
Logique féminine.
Something foul is afoot. US fervently oppose firearm imports. Yet America is a country awash in firearms and concomitantly the world’s largest exporter of weaponry and small arms.
Some truly Godless people in that country of yours.
Good thing an armed society is a polite society. God knows what would have become of the world if American society were not polite.
November 2nd, 2006 at 6:25 pm - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
Heh, someone on my blog told me Sony seemed lonely here.
Da*n those Americans for exporting the AK-47, world’s most popular ‘assault rifle’. How horrible of them.
Da*n America for exporting RPG’s. (Oh? Those are Russian? Well the Americans have LAWs! There are roughly zero LAWs in private hands? Oh.) Well it’s America’s fault! Somehow.)
Curse America for all those Stinger missiles they sent to Afghanistan used against the wonderful Soviets that are now being used by terrorists everywhere. What? There are no Stingers being used? The Americans were smart enough to ship missiles with rapid decay in the warheads, electronics propellant and power systems (Yes, I’m being deliberately vague) such that they’d no longer function after a few years? Sue them! Missiles should be good for decades!
Yep, American weapons are exported, but American weapons are high tech and expensive. Not your average terrorist’s choice.
Confusing a major exporter of high-tech weaponry with a major exporter of cheap small-arms that find their way into terrorist hands… now that’s logique féminine.
What you say with sarcasm, I quote with sincerity.
Have a nice day, and do be grateful for the speech you enjoy — on the internet developed by America, and with the freedoms paid for in American lives.
Anyway, we get the picture. It’s all America’s fault. Gotcha. Hope that makes you feel better.
Romania’s a good country. She might be a great country if people like you could let go of their anger and irrationality.
-wolfe
November 2nd, 2006 at 8:37 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7561c460e3352
I agree with most of what you said wolfe but in fairness some Stingers were still operating and being used against us in the early stages of our Afghan invasion. Not sure if they’re still working there, and haven’t heard of anything but RPG’s in Iraq, Soviet or Chinese made of course.
November 3rd, 2006 at 2:21 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Cicero’s Wolfe strikes again.
November 3rd, 2006 at 2:40 pm - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
You’re partly right in that people were concerned about this prospect. However, I don’t believe that’s strictly correct. The big concern was the SA-7 Grail and the Chinese HN-5 (copy of the SA-7). Not that it’s exactly the best of sources, but the BBC reported as of 2005 that no stingers had been used against US forces. If you’ve got better evidence, fair enough.
I’m pretty sure SA-7’s have been sporadically used in Iraq; not sure about Afghanistan. Two were used in that terrorist attack in Kenya back in ‘04, and they’ve been used in Saudi. I don’t believe stingers have been used since the early to mid 90’s.
An interesting note. America being the biggest arms dealer… stingers sell for up to $250,000US in south Asia. SA-7’s sell for $5000-$10,000. There are ~300-400 stingers being illicitly traded, which probably don’t work. Some estimates estimate up to 400,000-500,000 SA-7’s and derivatives are in circulation globally.
But yeah, it’s all America’s fault.
-wolfe
November 4th, 2006 at 5:46 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Anger and irrationality. Can’t you come up with another leitmotiv?
An apology for that particular scathing statement would be appropriate.
Time and again Romania and her precursor kingdoms have earned their way and payed heavy toll in blood and land for their very survival as a first fragmented and finally united nation of her people, let alone the meagre freedoms and often trampled independence.
Romania’s freedom was not and is not America’s either to grant, allow or impart. It was neither earned nor paid for by America in some selflessly generous and benevolent bestowal devoid of any interest.
The statement is blatantly typical of the American way of thinking, undue arrogance and superiority as well as the expectance of entitlement to laurels and recognition, due or otherwise. All bathed in fragrant sauce de l’ignorance.
Can you convey one sentence without malitiously libeling somebody? You fail to recall that it was not Americans alone that shed blood against the axis.
You can afford more largesse with your manners. They don’t last longer if you use them sparingly.
Have a nice day.
- Paul Van Dyk - We are alive
November 4th, 2006 at 6:15 am - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
Dunno, Sony. I’m not the one who’s spewed out little passive aggressive lines against your country; to the contrary, I’ve politely said she’s a good and even great country.
I’m not the one who’s railed continuously on your internal affairs showing a marked degree of malice and ignorance. I’m not the one who’s trolled repeatedly on the boards babbling about guns.
I’m not the one who’s said, over and over, cute little lines like “A lot of Godless people in your country”… or all but called you godless because of your positions on constitutional issues.
The post of mine that you quote? Well, it’s in response to a typical Sony troll about how America is the greatest arms exporter in the world. Yeah… Trident at $20bn to Britain is
And your ignorance of the world? Europe, and your nation, would be a very different place without the intervention of the US in two world wars. That’s simple fact, and you’re welcome to cocoon yourself in ignorance, but that doesn’t change objective reality as I see it.
The internet would not have been invented in Europe. I doubt Japan. Korea possibly, or China, sometime in the 21st century. Had the net been developed in either of those places, it would, one can be sure, have come chock-full of far more tools for governments to monitor and surveil — from the very beginning. It’s a simple matter of fact to point out you’re speaking now, in the way that you are, because of America.
Germany or Russia would overwhelmingly dominate Europe today were it not for the United States; probably Germany, since the USSR wouldn’t have had lend-lease, and Britain couldn’t have afforded to send all those Merlin Rolls-Royce engines without American aid.
Like many Europeans, you have little understanding of what moves the US. I don’t fully subscribe to these views, but they are extremely popular.
Most of us don’t give a rat’s ass for Europe, or for stationing troops there, or for playing your games. I’ll give the blunt view that many over here have. As a continent, you guys are great at stumbling into genocidal war after war after war, and creating, nurturing and propagating some of the most vicious ideologies known to man. When America goes to war, she now drops food to civilians on the ‘other side’. When Europe goes to war, she still goes to run the table for genocide. I’d speak pretty quietly were I from Europe.
Britain and Ireland get some exception from this (other, of course, than their bloody fratricidal conflict). Some. Portugal too. Maybe Switzerland. Maybe Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden. Not sure anyone else does.
November 4th, 2006 at 6:21 am - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
Dunno, Sony. I’m not the one who’s spewed out little passive aggressive lines against your country; to the contrary, I’ve politely said she’s a good and even great country.
I’m not the one who’s railed continuously on your internal affairs showing a marked degree of malice and ignorance. I’m not the one who’s trolled repeatedly on the boards babbling about guns.
I’m not the one who’s said, over and over, cute little lines like “A lot of Godless people in your country”… or all but called you godless because of your positions on constitutional issues.
The post of mine that you quote? Well, it’s in response to a typical Sony troll about how America is the greatest arms exporter in the world. Yeah… Trident at £76bn to Britain (especially during the cold war) is clearly morally the same as flooding Africa and the mid-east with SA-7’s, and flooding the world with your favorite bug-a-boo, the AK-47 “assault rifle”.
Amusingly, as usual, you ignore most of the substance, and focus in on something you can gibber against.
With you, it’s not about logic, rationality, it’s simply about invective and trying to be seen as winning an argument. Sad.
As for what you quoted and your ignorance of the world? Europe, and your nation, would be a very different place without the intervention of the US in two world wars. That’s simple fact, and you’re welcome to cocoon yourself in ignorance, but that doesn’t change objective reality as I see it.
The internet would not have been invented in Europe. I doubt Japan. Korea possibly, or China, sometime in the 21st century. Had the net been developed in either of those places, it would, one can be sure, have come chock-full of far more tools for governments to monitor and surveil — from the very beginning. It’s a simple matter of fact to point out you’re speaking now, in the way that you are, because of America.
Germany or Russia would overwhelmingly dominate Europe today were it not for the United States; probably Germany, since the USSR wouldn’t have had lend-lease, and Britain couldn’t have afforded to send all those Merlin Rolls-Royce engines without American aid.
Like many Europeans, you have little understanding of what moves the US. I don’t fully subscribe to these views, but they are extremely popular.
Most of us don’t give a rat’s ass for Europe, or for stationing troops there, or for playing your games. I’ll give the blunt view that many over here have. As a continent, you guys are great at stumbling into genocidal war after war after war, and creating, nurturing and propagating some of the most vicious ideologies known to man. When America goes to war, she now drops food to civilians on the ‘other side’. When Europe goes to war, she still goes to run the table for genocide. I’d speak pretty quietly were I from Europe.
Britain and Ireland get some exception from this (other, of course, than their bloody fratricidal conflict). Some. Portugal too. Maybe Switzerland. Maybe Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden. Not sure anyone else does.
I shan’t talk about the Iron Guard; I’ll simply say your country is a good country.
-wolfe
November 4th, 2006 at 7:47 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
No, it’s not about that. It’s about actually winning an argument. I can’t hope to infuse my views into your conscience, though. You’ve conclusively proven that already, you’re one stubborn Wolfe. Short of an outright conclusion, what I want to achieve is your admission of the merits, if not validity, of my views.
The thing is you associate both yourself and the American people in its entirety too thoroughly with the NRA, its constituents and its sympathisers.
To make a living manufacturing, lobbying and legislating for and dealing in lethal weapons and ammunition designed for use lethal or maiming use on human beings qualifies as Godless, in my ever so humble perception of morality and righteousness.
I’m incredulous about whatever purported point you intended to make about Russian domination of Europe. Maybe a 60 year old newsflash is in order, or I just misconstrued what you wished to say.
It’s precisely the Allied Powers’ ‘resolution’ and contrition towards it, done with US complicity, that established the circumstances necessary to spawn the second. You being knowledgeable and fond of your knowledge of history, especially naval tradition and history, I’m sure you know exactly what I’m referring to, obscure and uncomfortable truth though it may be.
American economical protectionism made it all the more difficult to pay back loans while German industry and national wealth were arguably forcefully expropriated by means of what is tantamount to international extortion, trampling all over human rights. Intriguingly, nobody ever seems to mention these things.
G’day.
- Pepe Deluxe - Before You Leave
November 4th, 2006 at 10:58 am - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
Again, you eject a number of paragraphs that talk, and show your ignorance of America.
You don’t remotely address ideas expressed above. I’m hesitant to continue to respond given your clear bad faith.
Yeah, this is clearly why Germany is deeply in debt to America. Not. Good grief, don’t you even check your ridiculous postulates for a ten second survival?
Throughout the last half of the 20th century, (Hint: that’s the time period after the second world war) America’s been pretty quiet on protectionism, for good or ill.
If you’d paid attention.
Since then? Into the 21st century? Yeah, lots of protectionism. Even then, a fraction of what Europe is pushing.
This is despicable. No decent human being could say this and assign it to America.
Yes, this occurred, and it was overwhelmingly Soviet forces that caused it.
So are you a decent human being or do you wish to continue to persist with lies? Your choice, of course.
Want to blame the Americans for what the Russians did and assign yourself as a trash human being? Or admit you were wrong and lying, as seems sadly usual on these boards?
Up to you.
-wolfe
November 4th, 2006 at 12:10 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
What the hell?! I was talking about the naval blockade by way of which Germany was forced to relent to the terms of surrender she actually did, at the end of the first war. What was America’s stance on the British (mostly) and French navies purposefully starving the German population then? A state of armistice had already been reached. Was a so much of a peep heard from the American press? An objection from her government?
Germany did in fact borrow heavily from the United Stated to pay off the war reparations as well as the spiraling older loans.
Isn’t it true that was so? And doesn’t it follow that those were human rights abuses?
Are these facts false? You seem much more proficient in the field of history than I. I do not exclude that I may be ignorantly founding some of my beliefs on false premises. Take this as back peddling, if you wish. Inform me as to the validity of these statements and thereupon which we shall continue the silogism accordingly. Or not.
G’day.
- Oxia - Domino
November 4th, 2006 at 3:32 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
I’m just dying to know what LaPierre and his kind will to say to God, when their day his reckoning comes.
- Jimmy Hendrix - All along the watchtower
November 5th, 2006 at 2:31 am - IP Man-Hash: a5d80956a3e6c
I could be wrong, but I thought it was the British who conducted the naval blockade at the surrender of Germany in WWI?
November 5th, 2006 at 5:08 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Yet another with reading comprehension difficulties.
November 5th, 2006 at 9:10 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Wolfe, as before, any discussion with you on any subject anything but the most innocuously pallid and insipid of neutral subject matters proved not only an exercise in futility but also my lack of wisdom in impugning on your preconceptions.
You are not to be engaged in discussion, for discussion with you is a truly misguided and unwise desiderate. You are quintessentially the typical verging anarcho-capitalist, gun “aficionado” NRA sympathiser (as opposed to financial supporter; it was never lost on me that you are technically not NRA ever since you first told me so, just as Female is not technically a feminist tree-hugger) although considerably more read and cursive in your reasoning, which is still for the most part biased and lopsided by tribute to the staunch precepts, even in error, you likely inherited.
Most unnerving of all is you seem to jump into an argument without talking the time to properly read what you’re retorting to. And yet more time to pass what you read through your filter of knowledge and reason. Just as you skipped to conclusions when I quoted that “angry scientist” blog, some time ago.
Trash human being? Alas… mediul, factor patologic. By all means, you’re entitled to your opinions, even if they show reason is lost on you. Utterly pointless.
A good day to you, Sir.
- Timo Maas - First Day (club remix radio edit)
November 5th, 2006 at 1:04 pm - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
You state your post was about the Naval blockade. OK. Here’s a direct quote of your post.
Sony, you’re in a world of your own. No reasonable person, after reading a paragraph discussing Russian domination of Europe, and referring to the mid 1940’s would readily interpret the “Allied Powers’” reference as referring to the Allied Powers of the First World War.
Indeed, the non capitalized Second, absent any reference to the First World War (and amidst clear references to the mid-1940’s) is by no means the clear statement you imagine it to be.
Yes, Sony, I have lost patience with you. You do not debate or discuss rationally, you simply hurl ad-hominem insults about the “Godless”, about my country, etc.
I do therefore respond somewhat harshly when I feel like doing so. No more harshly or rudely, however, than you seriously and repeatedly dismissing many in my country (and by implication me) as Godless.
I’m a man of very considerable, but not infinite patience. Your posting is at best disingenuous; at worst nonrational and dishonest.
That’s certainly possible. On the other hand, I seem capable of discussing matters with others on this board — even those with whom I disagree on some issues — such as SoTS.
I’ll stack up my posts against your rather more … excitable writings.
If by this you mean that I missed the mentally bizarre unannounced segue in your post from the Second World War and Russian domination of Europe to the WWI Naval Blockade, then, yes, I guess I don’t read closely enough. No sane rational human being could meet those standards though.
Writing clearly matters. You don’t.
Interpret those two sentences however you wish.
-wolfe
November 5th, 2006 at 1:40 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
There’s scarcely any other man on the forums with whom you’ve any divergence of opinion as close to diametrically opposed as with me. And firearms are not the only the only subject matter for political debate that we’ve distinctly disparate stances on.
Indeed, any link between the topics contained in those two distinct paragraphs of mine is non existent. I apologise for the mishap. I must have left room for a planned emerging trail of thought to facilitate the passage between the two and subsequently completely forgot about it.
That happens to me more than I’d care to. Especially on topics I’m so passionate about that my mind races with thoughts far too quick for my typing fingers to follow and the ideas decay all too fast. Of course, instead of extending me the courtesy of the doubt’s benefit, you immediately assume evil design and feigned sincerity. Fair enough.
One does not interpret anything as per one’s wishes. Interpretation of concepts and statements is not subject to one’s will. They are the precursors to it.
At most, one can claim to interpret a concept or statement differently than one does in actuality, or wish the concept or statement were somehow different or not at all, in the first place.
I interpreted those two sentences the only I could. Undoubtedly foreseeable.
I shan’t try your patience anymore. This has been the last time I raise any topic relating to firearms, the NRA, gun control advocacy, etc; anywhere on the blog or forums. I also have grown to find discussion with you to be tedious and, at best, unsavoury as of late.
G’day.
- Martin Solveig - everybody
November 5th, 2006 at 10:32 pm - IP Man-Hash: 0a66d10276b0f
wow you guys are startin to sound like girls. should someone be yelling cat fight???
November 6th, 2006 at 9:47 am - IP Man-Hash: 7e20a2b748599
yeh, Sonyad writes like a woman. None of his arguments make sense. How typical of a female!