Date Rape is a Myth
Personally, I have always known date rape victims and drug rape victims are lying whores. Of course “personally” is the worst way to be right about anything. “Personally” is subjective and emotional. It is prone to error and bias. “Personally” is womanly.
Unless you’re a man.
Men have magic black boxes of objectification in our brains that turn all life experience into laws you could wear as ship shaped shoes and walk across water. Men and their mighty, manly opinions on things are air tight. Fuck yea.
Scientifically, all date rape victims are lying whores.
According to a new study brought to us by the Manzillas at Wrexham Maelor Hospital, being a victim of “date rape” is like being a victim of getting a flat tire when you drive off a cliff. You did it, it’s your fault, you’re lying about how it happened because who the fuck drives off a cliff, and you’ve probably got a lot more wrong with your car than a flat tire.
Let me explain.
Recently, it was stated that in the UK, Rohypnol has never ever been used in a case of sexual misconduct. I say sexual misconduct because “date rape” is a crass and manipulative word. I refused to use it from now on. It rapes the true meaning of the word “rape”.
Well no shit. I’ve been to the UK tons of times and I’ve never seen Rohypnol being used. I could have told anyone that and they didn’t need to perform some study about it. Date rape drugs are hard to come by. And if they’re not that hard, they’re still harder than feeding a woman apple martinis by the gallon and reciting retarded lines about her hopes and dreams — all of which are asinine. If date rape drugs are illegal, then why isn’t Bryan Adams? Both work just as well.
Someone performed a study anyway, and here are the results of that study in the form of a boot straight up the ass of every woman who is culturally prejudiced against the way women are treated in the Middle East.
Over 12 months, and out of 75 patients who claimed to be victims of sexual misconduct and drink tampering with Rohypnol, GHB, or ketamine, 0% were found to have it in their system.
Zero fucking percent.
In an unsurprising twist, 100% of these women were found to be drunk as fuck.
65% of “rape victims” had a blood alcohol content of twice the legal driving limit.
25% of “rape victims” were three times over the limit.
20% of “rape victims” tested positive for amphetamines.
In the case of women, besides the flat tire, you’ve also got a 20% chance of being on amphetamines. I’m no vagina doctor, but I’m pretty sure they don’t put amphetamines in the birth control pills that none of these whores were taking when they hit Ladies Night like a drunken tornado of abandonment issues.
After reading through the research article below, which I suggest to anyone who’s first instinct is still to listen when a woman starts talking, I realized the horrible truth of what’s going on in the UK. Apparently some asshole is running around spiking women’s drinks with booze.
Holy shit! Someone call the Special Victims Unit! Bring in the swab kit! Or better yet, fire up the laugh track and call that village where Peter and the Wolf is set. What’s that village called?
It’s called Fantasy Land.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 16 … 13 12 11 10 9 [8] 7 6 5 4 3 … 1 » Show All
http://www.sirc.org/publik/flirt.pdf
“Research has also shown that men have a tendency to mistake friendly behaviour for sexual flirting. This is not because they are stupid or deluded, but because they tend to see the world in more sexual terms than women. There is also evidence to suggest that women are naturally more socially skilled than men, better at interpreting people’s behaviour and responding appropriately. Indeed, scientists have recently claimed that women have a special ‘diplomacy gene’ which men lack.”
i.e. when men interpret women’s behavior as ‘begging for cock’, quite ofetn the women are just being friendly.
If it’s so ‘difficult to imagine’ then why are you writing posts about how often it happenes?
The reality is, is that men should have more sense than have sex with an extreemly drunk woman.
Oh, and the word is paralytic. Next time you should do like me and call such a person a drunk fuck.
Conditioned little misandrist, aren’t we?
Well, it is a bit difficult to imagine that the girl who has been acting like a hot-to-trot slut for the entire evening (and is now, by the way, begging you for cock) is going to run to the police and cry rape the next morning, despite having a night of consensual sex with you. Plus, there is also the probability that the guy has also had a few too many drinks.
So just because two drunk fucks fuck, it shouldn’t result in the man having to go to jail?
We’re not talking about sexual assault. We’re talking about date rape and usage of drugs for it. If you would actually READ the article you would know dumb bitch.
Yes its stupid of women to get drunk around untrustworthy men, BUT with all the attension false rape allegations get in the media don’t you think it’s stupid of a man to proposition a woman whoes practically paraletic.
Is it because they don’t think being falsely acused of rape will happen to them? Or is it that no one else will have sex with them?
Of course some women lie about being raped, just as men who forcefully have sex with a woman they are involved with, or who they have just broken up with, lie to themselves and others that they didn’t actually engage in rape.
Date rape is not a myth, that is a completely incorrect statement that only a fool would give credance too. What would be more accurate to say is that not all reports of rape are valid, just as not all rapes that occur are reported. The statistics in this area will never ever be accurately known because of factors such as shame and the victim’s (incorrect) guilt that they may have bought it upon themselves or their confusion that it might not have been rape (even if they said no and tried their best to get away) because they were involved with the person who raped them, or had been previously involved with the person. Saying date rape is a myth is so insensitive to people who have actually been date raped.
I am neither an expert in social work nor a legal eagle, but what your statistic says to me is that 95% of reports of rape in the UK are false.
Which brings us to Dick’s point, date rape is a myth. As I have said before, all date rape reports are simply as a result of the woman getting herself intoxicated and then making a decision that she later regrets.
It is akin to someone getting drunk, driving their car into a utility pole, then running to the police to report that the utility pole had wrecked their car. The only difference between date-rape and the drunk driver scenario is that the utility pole doesn’t face several years in prison.
One last thing. Take your sympathy and shove it up your one of three orifices of your choosing. The sun don’t shine in any.
6 months. Compared to 3 years in that poor bloke’s case, or an average of 7 years in one particular effort of disculpating innocently sentenced men by reopening cases based on modern DNA test reevaluation of genetic evidence where still available. As I said above, 1 in 4 of which instances saw men having been unjustly imprisoned before genetic testing was available, practical or mandated by law for forensic purposes.
One doesn’t prance off to get off with any number of men before she’s allowed herself the time to report the rape to the police, now does she?
Of course, there’s the odd angle available to dispute even this. But mind you, these cases were not reports of alleged group rape. Just crass bullshit.
5%?! Pulling bullshit out of a cow’s (that shall remain unnamed) ass, are we now? Hooray, a new peak for feminism!
The possibility that maybe, just maybe, the other 95% reported instances are preposterously full of shit or the perpetrator was never apprehended didn’t even give you pause, now did it?
No, the whole framework of justice and law enforcement in a country with century of clean and fine tradition (sometimes pioneering in its pursuit of equity and preservation civil rights, such as with the Habeas Corpus statute) therein must somehow be insanely and perversely misogynistic and slanted against women, when it’s actually very much the opposite.
I suppose 1 in 4 men who hadn’t even been the last to have intercourse with the claimant before genetic residue was collected is “far less than men on this website make it out to be”, to the mathematically, nay - cognitively challenged.
Let’s not even talk about ’sexual assault’ which encompasses anything from a pinch to the butt to mildly lewd jokes among fugly, frustrated dykes. Or hindsight rape, or what have you.
I fear I must drop this subject now. The miasma of bullshit is somehow permeating the pc screen and I fear for my nostrils.
“Ironic, how the women - I use the term loosely - most crazed about potentially being raped, hopefully some way or another, are the ones that will most likely die pristinely ‘undefiled’.”
The way you talk about rape makes you sound as if you think women WANT it to happen to them, which is preposterous, sex should be something mutual between two people as a way of expressing their feelings to one another.
Women DO spend time in prison for false rape allegations; the amount of time depends on the amount of damage caused. I would probably say 6 months minimum, in a FEMALE prison (since you seem unable to grasp the concept that that’s where females go when they break the law).
No amount of false rape allegations make the fact that men rape women go away, you cannot deny it. And the fact that only 5% of REPORTED rapists are given a prison sentence (at least in the UK) is terrible
I have much sympathy for men who are falsely accused, but as ‘glandular problem’ (who has experience in the field) says, the amount is far less than men on this website make it out to be.
I I may attempt to wade through your thick bullshit. I asked you a clear and concise question.
What sort of jail time would be appropriate, in your humble, estrogen drowned view? Certainly, there would be some? At least an inclusion in some centralised, non discrete database, like there is for convicted rapists, as having lied their cunt off about it?
Certainly something, anything more than a verbal reprimand from the judge?
I did not ask for more of your bullshit on the matter. The average man being, as a rule of thumb, mantastically superior and competent in many varied ways to the average woman, the average male felon pleasant or safe company does not inherently make.
Please don’t push me to the man/chocolate bar analogy again.
Being the ‘true feminist’(bullshitter) you make yourself out to be, it’s peachy keen that men are being falsely convicted of rape (you can’t veraciously claim otherwise, not even your own ilk would take you up on this one). Though you can’t deny it you do the next best thing.
Downplay the incidence of false rape allegations and false rape allegations resulting in ’successful convictions’ and ceaselessly emphasize the incidence of true rapes gone unpunished or even reported(blank check for exaggerating bullshitting - who the fuck knows how many or few there really are?).
All the while giving the widest of births to the matter of convictions and lengths of incarceration of those fabled ‘2%’, false witnesses. When in actuality, at least 1 in 4 of all rape allegations aren’t even pointed at the man that last came knocking, judging by FBI statistics consistent over years compiled from DNA testing of sperm samples where applicable and conclusive.
Course, raising an accuser’s personal history or even identity in court as casting a dubitative light over the woman’s allegations is a big no-no. Not even revealing it after it having been proven to be utter and complete bullshit whilst there being no threat of trial, let alone conviction, of the lying bitch.
Take this British eye opener in the Daily Mail, for instance:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/newscomment.html?i n_article_id=405074
Typical feminist exacerbated bullshit.
Ironic, how the women - I use the term loosely - most crazed about potentially being raped, hopefully some way or another, are the ones that will most likely die pristinely ‘undefiled’.
Why don’t the two of you now piss off in unison?
- Celldweller - Frozen
Regarding the myth of false rape reports, as I said above,
“It’s nothing for you men to get your knickers in a twist over”, as the number of actual sexual assaults is much higher (even without the inclusion of sexual assaults of men/boys, which also are underreported).
In terms of reading comprehension, the article does not say that date rape is a myth, but rather that the use of Rohypnol in sexual assaults in the UK is. Hence the statement, “many women fall victim to sexual assaults after being plied with alcohol�, among others.
As implied earlier (and by a few other posters), a rational person would not consider drinking to be a crime punishable by rape. Frankly, if it were I’m sure that bar owners and breweries would be quite upset (not to mention human beings capable of compassion and logical thought).
Binge drinking is certainly irresponsible, but nothing compared to the criminal nature of assault.
Not that you weren’t aware of the spin you put on the article, or that you intended to provide insight of any kind. Like the prank caller, you too are really only concerned with getting your rocks off at someone else’s expense (again, not like that’s news to you).
Most of them in fact.
-Dick
Truefeminist, you rock. Seriously. Please keep posting here.
As someone who worked at a sexual assault crisis centre, my only personal experience with false accusations of rape were those made by a man. A man who liked to use the crisis line as a way to get his rocks off.
He stopped prank calling after I asked a security guard (with a very deep voice) to respond to one of his long rants about what he (wished) had happen to him (as opposed to hanging up on him, as was the protocol at the time).
So pathetic.
That aside, yes, there are some false rape accusations, but it’s nothing for you men to get your knickers in a twist over. The percentage of false reports pales when compared to the number of unreported rapes, the number of cases that don’t go to trial, the number of actual rapes, etc etc and so forth.
In addition, I was not aware that drinking is a crime punishable by rape.
Good point. Double standards suck.
Again this young dumb bitch speaks as if she knows something.
Explaining anything to you just won’t do. You’re an idot.
Well why do you?
“That was me not caring.” if you don’t care about the state of women then why do spend so much time bitching about them?
“in a men’s prison, I presume?� Obviously not in a men’s prison:
Virtually every man on here talks about women as though we are the anti Christ. So by your logic, a place stuffed full of women and no men must be a worse place to be than a place stuffed full of men with no women.
Holloway is half full of prostitutes, whereas men’s prisons are half full of murderers. I know who I’d rather be in a confined space with.
Question, why are men’s prisons so much more unpleasant than women’s?
Answer: Because they’re full of men.
If you men were as wonderful as Dick makes you out to be, men’s prisons would be heaven compared to everyday life, where, god forbid women are everywhere. And yet, they’re not.
I’m curious. Do they try as adults in the states those underage boys who lay the wrong underage girl? If found guilty, what sort of conviction might there likely be?
What is the boy is slightly older, just enough that his legal classification is no longer that of a minor?
Any relevant statistics on the matter?
To the gauloise blonde. How very sweet that you managed to feel, correctly, what others have always known. That false allegations of rape are despicable.
Pertaining, what sort of jail times would you advise? Longer or equal incarceration to that a man convicted of rape might expect, in a men’s prison, I presume?