G.I. Joke
I assume all the men out there have seen the pictures of that US army woman behaving atrociously in some terrible looking part of the world. I’m betting you have because unlike women, men read and watch the news.
You may have seen the woman and not realized it. Army Girl looks exactly like a adolescent boy. She is in fact a woman. If a closer visual inspection doesn’t sufficiently verify this for you, just take a look at her actions: avoidance of responsibility, child-like sadism driven by penis envy, and looks awful in pictures.
If that’s not a woman plain as day, then I just don’t know what is.
If there is a better case for why women have absolutely no business in the armed services then I would like to know about it so I can write an additional essay on that. The crux of the matter remains fixed, however. Women shouldn’t be in the army because they have absolutely no concept of war.
Men know that war is a simple progression of debate. Once a diplomatic solution won’t pacify the situation, differences will be resolved via a bout of fisticuffs — be it nuclear or regular-style. Then we are all done with it and both sides go home happy.
Women, however, think of war like a divorce. It’s their chance to stick it to the bad guy. They’ll stop at absolutely nothing to cause as much pain as possible, no matter who suffers for it: men, children — even other women. Can you imagine such a sick mentality? It’s completely true though.
Lynndie England has been discharged I’m pretty sure, but that’s not enough. No way, no how. All politics aside, it won’t be enough until every woman is booted out of the army completely, with nothing to show for it but a duffle bag with the word “ARMY” crossed out with a Sharpie.
You can think of a million reasons why women shouldn’t be allowed within ten miles of a government facility. Here’s one, they can’t keep track of anything for longer than ten seconds. It seems like a fundamental misunderstanding of the process, civility, and general manliness of war would be tantamount to all these.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 3 [2] 1 » Show All
There are millions of men that feel the same way you do.
My Manheart broke the day ‘they’ started letting women fly fighter aircraft. I had a female piolet for one of my incentive fights on an F-15D. She put my balls in the back of my throat, and I won’t take that away from her, but she thought it best to cut the ride short because her external fuel tanks weren’t x-ferring into her engines equally. It was then that I realized this was the same bitch who cut almost every one of her flights short back at home station for the same reason. The thing is, that is normal operation for a fighter jet, and all a flyer needs to do is check their flight manual for that problem, and it will tell them that its fine. Back at my hotel I found myself thinking of all the piolets I had debriefed in my career. Most were men, and some were women, but the common factor that all female piolets shared was that they really didn’t seem to give a fuck about the fact that in most cases, it was their lack of problem solving abilities had been the actual problem, not the fine peice of metal they had just taken flying hours from. My bottom line is that I don’t feel that females have the mental capacity to be entrusted with anything more complex than giving birth to children, let alone riding around in multi-million dollar machines.
Talon, that was an excellent post. It bascially hit nail and tooth in every fucking shit that dumb bitch posted. Well said.
Sorry if I am pissing off everyone enjoing watching Nicole shoot herself in the foot with an assault rifle, but this blatant attempt at logic requires correction. And I need experience in dealing with women in debates, so I believe it is my right as a man to correct Nicole’s attempt at reason, and negative generalizations about men as well.
There might not have been equalivents, but they sure as hell were no angels either. Try reading Women of the Klan, then come back.
Why am I saying that? Because, by using logic, I can see that nazism and racism are alike on many points, racism being hatred against blacks (or whites, if you are black) and Nazism, on many levels, involved hatred of jews. What is common here? Hatred!
While this is not 100% flawless logic, I read a book on the subject, that I will happily find again (forgot the title), and quote if nessescary. Additionally, the term “feminazi” was not invented by accident.
And you stating that there certainly were no female equalivant of Hitler is one generalization I would like to see you prove.
That door swings both ways, honey.
So does this one. Let me open it correctly for you.
There are many good men and women, but there are many evil ones too.
I call BS. Prove that, or retract your statement.
“I know” is not a valid argument, and when it fits your case, I cannot give you the benefit of the doubt, (that, by the way, does not exist.)
Or I can be nice, and disprove it anyway. How does that sound?
Go read the SCUM manifesto.
Or better yet, ignore that and respond with a ad-hominem so I can get a good laugh.
Reversing the genders here not only ruins your entire point (If you had one), but your reasoning as well. You claim that “some men” will murder anyone different to them, yet you also claim that no woman would do the same? I call bullshit.
…Putting the total number of US soldiers, no, the entire army, at about 1,1 million soldiers. Now, it could just be me, or does this number seem awfully small, considering that the estimate of the populace in the U.S.A here in ‘07 are 301,747,000 individuals. Then again, I do not live in the US.
You do care, otherwise you would not have posted that, or tried to convince anyone that you are right. Tool.
And, now we are at the subject of facts, please post the source, or these “facts” look like hogwash. The other Nicole appears to have an objection to your facts, however. Maybe ask her as well?
And when we cannot read it for oursleves, how are we supposed to verify that these “facts” are indeed that?
Translation:
Good Carlie, have a biscuit.
I could be reading too much into this, but this looks awfully like you, stroking Carlie’s ego as a reward for his/her behaviour, and encouraging others to be like him/her. Just as your genetic programming would have you do.
There exist no ignorent men. Ignorent is not a word.
Because it is a completely impossible thought, that the women might be in, because they are women, right?
I take it you have watched G.I Jane. She had acess to a wooden step, that she ended up using. Time was also removed from her total because it was standard protocol for women. Mind you, this was on the obstacle course.
Today, they have a seperate one for women. And it is not because the other one (the one for men) is too easy.
Thereby assuming, that all women in the U.S Army are brave, strong and dedicated. Which, as far as I am concerned, is something you cannot possibly hope to prove.
Are you?
If yes, then join all these brave, strong and dedicated women in Iraq.
If no, stop trying to shame Dick for not covering your sorry hide against the muslims.
I win either way.
If it is not too much to ask, please try to make a non-personal response. If it is, then knock yourself out.
Oh, and P.S: If my Man-hash changes, that is because I am currently sitting at another persons PC.
OH REALLY??? if they weren’t qualified?!?!? no honey - ive lived on these damn bases all my life - right now there are 6 cases within 1 month of these “soldier women” sleeping with married men….and there are PLENTY of examples of how they are not qualified….and THIS IS COMING FROM A WOMAN….
YES!!! i am a woman and proud army wife….it boils my blood to see those little girls in the uniform!!! they do it to pay their way through college or to get a big bonus…and they endanger ALL of our service men!!! i agree with you 110%! another essay you can write is about how they made Jessica Lynch a “war hero” after it was HER fault they got ambushed….there is a quote from her that says, regarding the ambush “i didnt fire 1 round….i just dropped to my knees and prayed” THIS MADE ME FURIOUS!!!! If my husband would have died due to her not being able to handle the pressure of war - then i’d have killed her myself!
___
Long live the Red states down under.
- Benassi Bros & Dhany - Rocket in the sky
Sieg Vile!
- atb with heather nova - renegade (aandt mix)
Women are in the army, for one reason and one only, solely to hold non-combat jobs and fill the (wo)man power needs of the military. Why, because the draft would not, cannnot and will not be politically or socially accepted post Vietnam short of actual invasion of Us territory. Not even the “war on terror” is enough to change this thinking. Imagine a draft tomorow, and then imagine how many homosexual, drug abusing males will suddenly pop up out of nowhere.
Hortenzia, you should be more careful in choosing your references.
Thanks W-Hortencia,
I’m still reading through them… actually your second link isn’t working right now for some reason, but I’ll try it later.
The first link has a lot of information in support of my previous comment…
Including evidence of females being sexual abuse perpetrators more often than males by Russell and Finkelhor.
There are also some nice quotes there from Kauffman’s study in 1995 on sexual abusers
“8% of the female perpetrators were teachers and 23% were baby-sitters, compared to male perpetrators who were 0% and 8% respectively”
Also interesting:
“In a retrospective study of male victims, 60% reported being abused by females (Johnson and Shrier, 1987)”
“In other studies of male university and college students, rates of female perpetration were found at levels as high as 72% - 82% (Fromuth and Burkhart, 1987, 1989; Seidner and Calhoun, 1984)”
“Finally, there is an alarmingly high rate of sexual abuse by females in the backgrounds of rapists, sex offenders, and sexually aggressive men, 59% (Petrovich and Templer, 1984), 66% (Groth, 1979), and 80% (Briere and Smiljanich, 1993)”
“In the U.S., figures provided by the American Association for the Protection of Children (1985) reveal that most physical abuse and most minor and major injuries of children are perpetrated by women. Other research evidence indicates that mothers represent the majority of physical abusers and neglecters of children (Johnson and Showers, 1985; Rosenthal, 1988). Archambault et al., (1989) found that mothers are the major perpetrators of physical abuse for both male and female runaways.”
“Stressed to the limit, these mothers take out their frustrations on their children.”
“Fathers are also two times more likely by the perpetrator in cases involving child fatalities (Jason and Andrek, 1983).”
but in later studies…
“In other studies no sex differences, in terms of severity of abuse or child fatalities in two-parent families, were found (Gelles, 1989; Greenland, 1987)”
Like I said, still reading through it, though.
Seems to be in accorance with what I’ve been saying, though. The information on female sexual abusers is new information here; but interesting none the less.
http://www.aest.org.uk/survivors/male/ibc3.html
These aren’t my statistics, but you should still take a look. If you skip down about half way on the NSPCC page you’ll find the section on gender.
http://www.nspcc.org.uk/inform/Info_Briefing/AbuseOfChildrenInResident ialCare.asp
Not my statistics, W-Hortencia, that would near worthless. How about you RTFA and see the data sources for yourself; that’s why I included them.
Yes of course. Of the abused people I know (2) they were both abused by men, 1 sexually and the other had the shit kicked out of her ever since she can remember by her Daddy. But if that’s what your statistics say then it must be true!
Yea, that’s a boot in the ass of feminism if I’ve ever seen one. Cheers, alen.
-Dick
Indeed…
http://misformalevolent.blogspot.com/2005/08/n-is-for-nurturer.html
“women are TWICE as likely to abuse their children as men”
http://www.glennsacks.com/domestic_violence_series.htm
“women generally use less detectable methods to murder intimates than men do, including poisonings, which are often mistakenly recorded as ‘heart attacks’ or ‘accidents.’ ”
“women are much more likely than men to convince their extramarital intimates to do the killing, or to use contract killers, who often disguise murders as accidents or suicides”
“there are five times as many unsolved murders of men as there are of women”
“violence in abusive relationships is often initiated by women, and that women are responsible for a substantial portion of domestic violence at all levels of severity”
Thank god women were not born with physical strength. This, in combination with their natural vindictiveness and hatred for anyone who disagrees with them, would make them very, very dangerous.
Just because you say it, doesn’t make it true Nicole. You’re more vindictive and able to hold a grudge than you realize. To wit: what the fuck are you still doing on my site?
-Dick
The thing is, I’m awful at holding a grudge, and this isn’t uncommon among females. No matter how awful someone’s been to me, if they apologise I’ll be fine with it. After all life’s too short.
How exactly is it you know what women think or feel Dick, come on I’m dying to know.
The question is, are they at peace with you; and for how long?
Female relationships tend to harbor more grudges, and use subversive techniques to ostracise members of a group, as a form of psychological abuse.
When conflict occurs in male relationships, it is often pieced together more easily. It’s actually not uncommon, for example, to hear of male friendships that gelled after individuals had competed or faught with each other.
Also; women are typically more likely to bargain as part of a general problem resolution; while men tend to focus on reason and logic. Your example is quite a poigniant, actually.
I’ll leave it as an exercise for the reader to determine what a “female Churchill” would have done for the world; and how a “female Hitler” would have been different.