Greatness Comes in Inches

Greatness Comes in Inches. That’s a bit of subtle penis humor for you, but it’s also true.

Being an inch short for a roller coaster means waiting a year to try again. Missing Hitler by an inch with your 1903 Springfield sniper rifle means your kids are playing Wolfenstein with German keyboards. If the milkman had missed Lynne Spears’ vagina by an inch, there would be no Britney.

Anal is the only form of birth control shown to be 100% effective. Even abstinence failed once.

In the case of IQ, science has shown men to be smarter than women by mere inches. Even though women act like retarded monkeys, they don’t test like them. Still, what does “mere inches” actually look like? I’ll bet it’s fucking enormous.

That’s another bit of subtle penis humor for you.

Men have more grey matter in their brains than women. Man scientists proved it and I brought it to you like Moses under a hail of feminist denial. Men have statistically higher IQs and are statistically more often geniuses. Once again, man science proved it and I repeated it. I also shut that fat bitch’s yap on Dr. Phil.

Men are better than women.

The following graph is a combination of different studies done on adult intelligence. On average, men are five IQ points smarter than women. Male intelligence is also more widely distributed than women, meaning that men are more likely to vary from the average intelligence of 103. Women, with their ability to interpret everything wrong and in their favor, claim this wider distribution to be proof that men are more often geniuses and more often idiots.

Wrong.

Also, women say that five IQ points is not really a big deal.

Let’s see just how big of a deal 5 IQ points are. This is how you take math and shove it up women’s ass.

men-women-iq-statistics-graph-copy.jpg

I’ll be the first to admit, when the average intelligence levels of men and women are graphed with a bunch of boring lines and a boring piss yellow background, it doesn’t look like a big deal. But look at what happened after I colored it in.

men-women-iq-statistics-graph-fill.jpg

All of the sudden, women look dumb as shit.

The Wave of Genius

Women are dumb as shit. That gigantic blue curtain up there that hovers menacingly over women and their stupidity like it’s waiting to show them how to press the big fucking green button on the fax machine that says “Fax” in order to fax something — or better yet, how to access a file on the shared network drive without moving it’s entire contents onto their local computer and then leaving for a three day weekend. That blue fuck-you is something I like to call the Wave of Genius.

The Wave of Genius is made up of mere inches, but it also gave us algebra and pesticides. “Mere inches” gave us irrigation, plumbing, bronze, the internet, airplanes and X-Ray machines. “Mere inches” gave us Caddyshack and it gave us this website. If men are consistently better than women by 5%, that means men invented and conceived of everything 5% faster than women.

Which means men created everything.

1% can be a huge number. Condoms fail 2% of the time when used perfectly, and that’s a big fucking percent. Trust me. 5%? I don’t even want to think about paying for five abortions. One is expensive enough.

Using advanced CSI photo analyzing techniques, I was able to take a closer look at the Wave of Genius. Look at what happened when I zoomed in on the massive gap between men and women at the 132 IQ range.

men-women-iq-statistics-graph-zoom1.jpg

Enhance.

men-women-iq-statistics-graph-zoom2.jpg

Enhance.

men-women-iq-statistics-graph-zoom3.jpg

Enhance.

men-women-iq-statistics-graph-zoom4.jpg

If you’re surprised by that, you’re a woman. Fuck off my website.

Thanks to Rodrigo de la Jara for the graph.

And thanks to Anonymous for this:

dick-quagmire.jpg

UPDATE:

Woman reading this article: “I can’t believe you put Isaac Newton in there in front of Jesus.”
Me: “That’s Einstein.”

Men are better than women.

Related Articles:

179 Responses to “Greatness Comes in Inches”

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 79 » Show All

  1. GhengisKhunt Says:

    “reading is for women!”
    which is apparently why this website was completely overlooked.
    women invent things. period. end of story. fucking duh. do some research.

    http://www.women-inventors.com/

  2. Jim Says:

    no manhole said:

    Jim said:

    13 year old girls should not be looking at websites like this. It will turn them into feminists.

    5% higher IQ does not mean 5% more intelligence.
    Someone with 200 IQ is not twice as smart as someone with 100 IQ - he is maybe 1000x as smart, who knows really? IQ is a measure of frequency of occurance of various intelligence levels and correllates with intelligence, but is not a direct measure. The manpoint of all this…?
    The point is 5% in IQ is more than 5% in ability and brain power. In addition to a high IQ, and genius needs a high MQ or Manliness Quotient.

    Your statement is false. The distribution of IQ scores for a population follows a normal error, or gaussian distribution, so is a relative measure of the ability to answer questions on the IQ test. This is likely to be highly corelated with intelligence.

    You can’t seriously believe someone with a 200 IQ is only twice as smart as someone with 100 IQ.
    My statement is not false. IQ is a QUOTIENT. It is a measure of a person’s rarity of intelligence ability against the average. It does not measure intelligence directly. Nobody does that. You are right in that it correlates with intelligence, but it certainly is not a linear correllation.
    I will describe its original definition in simple terms: it was defined as an age and ability multiple at the age of 11. For simplicity, we’ll pretend it was at age ten. In that system, IQ means this:
    A 10-year-old with IQ 70 is as smart as the average 7-year-old.
    A 10-year-old with IQ 80 is as smart as the average 8-year-old.
    A 10-year-old with IQ 90 is as smart as the average 9-year-old.
    A 10-year-old with IQ 100 is as smart as the average 10-year-old.
    A 10-year-old with IQ 110 is as smart as the average 11-year-old.
    A 10-year-old with IQ 120 is as smart as the average 12-year-old.
    A 10-year-old with IQ 130 is as smart as the average 13-year-old.
    A 10-year-old with IQ 140 is as smart as the average 14-year-old.
    A 10-year-old with IQ 150 is as smart as the average 15-year-old.
    A 10-year-old with IQ 160 is as smart as the average 16-year-old.
    A 10-year-old with IQ 170 is as smart as the average 17-year-old.
    A 10-year-old with IQ 180 is as smart as the average 18-year-old.
    A 10-year-old with IQ 190 is as smart as the average 19-year-old.
    A 10-year-old with IQ 200 is as smart as the average 20-year-old.

    This is the first definition of IQ, but is so hard to measure below 70 and above 130 that a new definition based on rarity is now used.
    This new definition is scaled so that certain numbers of people fall into each range in order to fit the gaussian distribution curve. It says nothing about relative brain power, only relative rarity and ranking.
    It is a measure of how many people are capable of answering the harder and harder questions in the tests, and not a direct measure of the relative difficulty in answering the questions. Many of the questions are of a type that 150 IQ questions cannot be answered by 2 100-IQ people, or one 100-IQ person taking twice as long at it. No matter how many people cooperate on the question, only the genius makes any sort of contribution. How would you measure that?
    A person with IQ = 100 does not answer twice as many questions as someone with IQ = 50. A 50 IQ is very poor and the person with that IQ is retarded and wouldn’t be able to answer anything. Someone with 200 IQ can do things a million people with 100 IQ would never be able to do in a thousand years, they are not simply “twice as smart” - its impossible to fathom how much smarter they really are.

    Basically, 10% more IQ is more than 10% more intelligence. The scale is highly non-linear, and my previous statement is true. IQ is a measure of one’s place on a ranked distribution, that is all.

  3. Jim Says:

    RdM LtrS said:

    Anonymous said:

    What you say makes absolutely no sense at all. Women are just as smart as men. At my school alone there was a girl who got 100% on her ACT’s. You must not know very many women to think so low of them. Even if the only women you have known weren’t the best it’s unfair to just use them as your example for ALL women. Just because there are a lot of asshole men doesn’t mean all men are assholes. Just because there are stupid women doesn’t mean all women are stupid. Get the correlation?

    Oh and how come you say you’re classy yet you curse so often? It really isn’t necessary, if you’re serious about your point, you only make yourself sound a lot less educated and it makes it harder for people to take you seriously.

    *Fun Fact* did you know that the ACT’s were designed as a handicap to help women bolster their testing scores. Women test so poor on the SATs on an average that they had to completely redo the strategy of testing for pre-college qualifications. I took both tests straight out of highschool 6 years ago. I scored 1150 on my SAT and I got 30 on my ACT which is equivalent to a 1330 on SAT. Do you know why I did better on my ACT? Because it was fucking easier! It was jam packed with pretty pictures and diagrams like a children’s book. To reinstate this fact further, I had taken 3 practice SATs to prepare and not one single practice ACT. *Ahem*

    Yes. You are right.
    And blacks complain about biased IQ tests all the time. They say they are not culturally independent or some such thing. The truth is, even the black-designed, black-friendly tests don’t help them. Nobody has been able to design an IQ test that blacks do better than whites at - NOBODY.
    If someone can develop a test that a girl gets 100% in, I bet many more boys would get the top marks too. There are more male retards and geniuses, they just vary to the extremes more.

  4. Jim Says:

    cop stash said:

    Anonymous said:

    It seems to me that that the “default” argument women have against this website is that the men sharing the same view are bitter that they are unable to get a woman.

    I’m sorry… But that makes as much sense as a white supremacist saying they hate blacks because they want to be black.

    Disliking something because it’s inaccessable is a distinctly female behavior. I don’t know how many times I’ve heard women say they “hate” a man that recently broke up with them.

    In all truth, men that are desperately in love with women end up having less sex. Is it attractive for a man you’re dating to constantly call you saying how much they adore you? How about wanting to spend every available second by your side? No. These are not male characteristics.

    Knowing how to successfully play hard to get is not the same thing as putting down every charateristic of a woman. That is why you get a “default argument”. The argument on this site is that there is nothing good about women. Someone made a great point earlier when they said that racism always puts the oppenent on the defensive, and that is what is happening here.

    Dick’s main argument is that men are better, not that there is nothing good about women. There are a lot of bitter men how might argue differently, but I think the web site’s argument is pretty clear.
    Also, it is very easy to get a woman, the questions most men are asking are:
    A - Is it worth it?
    B - How do you make sure you don’t end up with a bitch?

  5. no manhole Says:

    Jim said:

    You can’t seriously believe someone with a 200 IQ is only twice as smart as someone with 100 IQ.
    My statement is not false. IQ is a QUOTIENT. It is a measure of a person’s rarity of intelligence ability against the average. It does not measure intelligence directly. Nobody does that. You are right in that it correlates with intelligence, but it certainly is not a linear correllation.
    I will describe its original definition in simple terms: it was defined as an age and ability multiple at the age of 11. For simplicity, we’ll pretend it was at age ten. In that system, IQ means this:
    A 10-year-old with IQ 70 is as smart as the average 7-year-old.
    etc.

    Jim: I stand corrected and I learned something from you. Thanks.

  6. cop stash Says:

    If you can read the above graph, than you will see that the vast majority of people are of normal IQ, and there is no or insignificant differences in the average Joe/Jane. On the other hand, the graph cleary shows that males end up on the extreme ends of intelligent. These people with IQ’s between 148-164 ( where the difference lies ) are so very intelligent that they can, with the proper motivation, achieve nearly anything the world can throw at them. I think that when confronted by people of this intelligence, wheither thier IQ is 158 or 162 is going to be of very little consequence. Also, a fact that was dismissed by the author as a feminist claim, is that men also beat women by several points on the lower end of the spectrum. So in essence, men are more often retarded? Again I will say that when you get into IQ’s this low I don’t think you will have much more luck communicating with a woman who’s IQ is 58 than a mans who is 53. Honestly, these are a handful of people who simply do not speak for all of us.

  7. cop stash Says:

    Is it worth it? I think it always is. And you never know what kind of person your going to end up with, that is just life. As far as bitching goes, you will probably never find a woman who doesn’t bitch at you, however that is just the nature of relationships. You will have your less proud moments as well, but why would you not want to experience it at all? Given, there are always a handful of men and women who decide to give it up and just be alone, but I would pass on that one. Look around you, people have been settling down and having families with a significant other since the beginning of time. I doubt if you are special in this respect.

  8. cop stash Says:

    I guesse what I am trying to say is that this comparision of the intelligence between men and women, while a rather crappy basis for argument, doesn’t have much real world relevance in what either sex is capable of achieving

  9. Jim Says:

    no manhole said:

    Jim said:

    You can’t seriously believe someone with a 200 IQ is only twice as smart as someone with 100 IQ.
    My statement is not false. IQ is a QUOTIENT. It is a measure of a person’s rarity of intelligence ability against the average. It does not measure intelligence directly. Nobody does that. You are right in that it correlates with intelligence, but it certainly is not a linear correllation.
    I will describe its original definition in simple terms: it was defined as an age and ability multiple at the age of 11. For simplicity, we’ll pretend it was at age ten. In that system, IQ means this:
    A 10-year-old with IQ 70 is as smart as the average 7-year-old.
    etc.

    Jim: I stand corrected and I learned something from you. Thanks.

    Thanks. It is a very misunderstood subject. You stand corrected because men are better at being proved wrong than women. None of this information would have made much of a dent in the average women’s armor of ignorance and wishful thinking.

  10. AnonDeath Says:

    Jim said:
    The answer is because men make everything look so easy. We don’t groan and complain and blow our own trumpets all the time. We just get the job done quick and don’t expect any thanks or praise. For example, if a woman is somehow convinced to mow a lawn anybody would think she’d just dragged a 200 lb anvil up Mt. Everest the way she goes on and on about it.

    Okay i find that statement bullshit.
    fact is men are just as dumb and retarded as females are, fuck I think theres more of them then women. Honestly I can’t take a step outside seeing some guy making an ass of himself, (This guy and the people making the comments included)

    But in general I find this great, so many morons cluster fucking whining about how great they are compared to women.

    HAHA, hypocrite.

    Oh wow, I just proved that guy wrong by pointing at the website.

    God, you guys are fucking stupid. Go out get a hobby and stop complaining, the only thing you are going to end up is one lonely man.

    Also I feel sorry for Dick’s mom, to raise such a pathetic low life I would commit suicide just to hide the fucking shame.

  11. Arbalest Says:

    If you have the time to go through a website and pick out things to rant about you shouldn’t be talking about people finding hobbies. Hell, we feel sorry for your mom, raising someone with nothing better to do then to troll on the internet.

  12. cop stash Says:

    Arbalest said:

    If you have the time to go through a website and pick out things to rant about you shouldn’t be talking about people finding hobbies. Hell, we feel sorry for your mom, raising someone with nothing better to do then to troll on the internet.

    Look who’s talking

  13. Arbalest Says:

    Thanks for offering yourself as a great example.

  14. cop stash Says:

    Arbalest said:

    Thanks for offering yourself as a great example.

    I think we all have better things to do, we just unfortunantly chose to waste our time here, me included.

  15. Anon-Death Says:

    Haha, Moron.

    Actually I’m working.

    Second I didn’t go through the website, fuck I don’t need to. The youtube movie of Dick just describe him and the whole entire website in a nice measly few minutes.

    But besides that are you going to reply to my other comments or just ignore them like a retarded baby.

  16. doubt Says:

    manhole said:

    [TL;DR]

    She’s just having a bad hair day. Sure some children are starving in Africa, but she’s a cum-gargling manhole.

  17. Max G. Says:

    People fall in love and then they are betrayed.

    Sounds like you’re the prepubescant as you’re the one who flashes your hollow wealth to gain access to overused twats and thinks you’ll “find an equal”.

    I’d say youre in highschool but when I look at beta behavior you could be 40.

    Five Finger Death Punch - The Bleeding

    Who do you think you are to judge people?

    I claimed no wealth, i search for no equal.

    you insult me and assume superiority.

    you’re nothing but a sad voice on an empty page.
    enjoy your self-built fortress of misery, your ignorance betrays you.

  18. Bach (Sadly my real name) Says:

    When I found out about this site, I have to admit I was offended hence I am a woman. Yet the more I read, the more I realize how much of a joke this is. To truly be offended, I would have to believe that all men are sadly this hateful and ignorant. Of course, my womanly denial forced me to laugh and find the dark comedy among all this.

    At the end of the day, I could laugh or boil with rage but it wouldn’t matter either way because as we all know the Y chromosome is shrinking each year. One of these days, poof, all the men are gone.

    Enjoy your last days on the earth, men.

  19. Papasan Says:

    Please don’t ever write “all of the sudden” again. It is “all of a sudden”. A man is saying it to other men, and so it shall be. Man it up.

  20. Muzalon Says:

    Bach (Sadly my real name) said:

    When I found out about this site, I have to admit I was offended hence I am a woman. Yet the more I read, the more I realize how much of a joke this is. To truly be offended, I would have to believe that all men are sadly this hateful and ignorant. Of course, my womanly denial forced me to laugh and find the dark comedy among all this.

    At the end of the day, I could laugh or boil with rage but it wouldn’t matter either way because as we all know the Y chromosome is shrinking each year. One of these days, poof, all the men are gone.

    Enjoy your last days on the earth, men.

    When did you last have sex with a black person?

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 79 » Show All

Leave a Reply


Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis