Greatness Comes in Inches
Greatness Comes in Inches. That’s a bit of subtle penis humor for you, but it’s also true.
Being an inch short for a roller coaster means waiting a year to try again. Missing Hitler by an inch with your 1903 Springfield sniper rifle means your kids are playing Wolfenstein with German keyboards. If the milkman had missed Lynne Spears’ vagina by an inch, there would be no Britney.
Anal is the only form of birth control shown to be 100% effective. Even abstinence failed once.
In the case of IQ, science has shown men to be smarter than women by mere inches. Even though women act like retarded monkeys, they don’t test like them. Still, what does “mere inches” actually look like? I’ll bet it’s fucking enormous.
That’s another bit of subtle penis humor for you.
Men have more grey matter in their brains than women. Man scientists proved it and I brought it to you like Moses under a hail of feminist denial. Men have statistically higher IQs and are statistically more often geniuses. Once again, man science proved it and I repeated it. I also shut that fat bitch’s yap on Dr. Phil.
Men are better than women.
The following graph is a combination of different studies done on adult intelligence. On average, men are five IQ points smarter than women. Male intelligence is also more widely distributed than women, meaning that men are more likely to vary from the average intelligence of 103. Women, with their ability to interpret everything wrong and in their favor, claim this wider distribution to be proof that men are more often geniuses and more often idiots.
Wrong.
Also, women say that five IQ points is not really a big deal.
Let’s see just how big of a deal 5 IQ points are. This is how you take math and shove it up women’s ass.
I’ll be the first to admit, when the average intelligence levels of men and women are graphed with a bunch of boring lines and a boring piss yellow background, it doesn’t look like a big deal. But look at what happened after I colored it in.
All of the sudden, women look dumb as shit.
The Wave of Genius
Women are dumb as shit. That gigantic blue curtain up there that hovers menacingly over women and their stupidity like it’s waiting to show them how to press the big fucking green button on the fax machine that says “Fax” in order to fax something — or better yet, how to access a file on the shared network drive without moving it’s entire contents onto their local computer and then leaving for a three day weekend. That blue fuck-you is something I like to call the Wave of Genius.
The Wave of Genius is made up of mere inches, but it also gave us algebra and pesticides. “Mere inches” gave us irrigation, plumbing, bronze, the internet, airplanes and X-Ray machines. “Mere inches” gave us Caddyshack and it gave us this website. If men are consistently better than women by 5%, that means men invented and conceived of everything 5% faster than women.
Which means men created everything.
1% can be a huge number. Condoms fail 2% of the time when used perfectly, and that’s a big fucking percent. Trust me. 5%? I don’t even want to think about paying for five abortions. One is expensive enough.
Using advanced CSI photo analyzing techniques, I was able to take a closer look at the Wave of Genius. Look at what happened when I zoomed in on the massive gap between men and women at the 132 IQ range.
Enhance.
Enhance.
Enhance.
If you’re surprised by that, you’re a woman. Fuck off my website.
Thanks to Rodrigo de la Jara for the graph.
And thanks to Anonymous for this:
UPDATE:
Woman reading this article: “I can’t believe you put Isaac Newton in there in front of Jesus.”
Me: “That’s Einstein.”
Men are better than women.
Related Articles:
Pages: [10] 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 » Show All
men only need inches but when they give one to a woman she takes a mile more
I’m with the girls on this one, Dick. This post was boring. Looking forward to funnier articles!
I could waste time acting offended, etc. but you’ve gotten that from plenty of people already, so I don’t see the logic behind that.
Let me just point one thing out: In the U.S., averages aren’t going to matter. So whatever averages you use, however perfectly you manage to prove that on “average,” women are inferior, you aren’t going to get anyone’s rights revoked.
The way this country is structured, we’re not based on the idea that we’re all equally intelligent. We’re based on the idea that each individual has the right to prove him/herself, without presumptions associated with race, class, or gender or whatever. So my attitude is this: If the most inferior male is still superior to the most superior female, go ahead and revoke women’s rights. But if you can’t prove the universal truth of male superiority, you haven’t gained an inch – whoops, there I go, using your words – on your previous chauvinist campaign.
In short, you’ve gotten a lot of publicity; you’ve made your share of money off of your campaign and will likely continue to do so. Am I worried that your cause will actually become a movement that threatens women’s rights? No, not really. Your articles are filled with cheap shots and blanket statements that have little or no support in factual evidence, so I’ll start worrying about women’s rights when you start making a legitimate case for yourself.
Meanwhile, you shut that “fat bitch’s yap” on Dr. Phil by throwing nasty comments at her about her weight. There’s not really anything intelligent in that. No intelligent argument or counterpoint. You merely threw an insult at her. Personally, I don’t think her argument was that intelligent, but you responded with nothing substantial.
But enjoy your publicity. Sensationalism has its place.
Yes – you could waste your time in vitriolic indignation; but why follow the redundantly bland, incomprehensive, and analytically incapable who have come before yourself, shrewing-away.
Instead, like so many, you fail to understand that a lot of the jabs taken at whimmin on this site are from men in Western countries who are sick and tired of whimmin having SPECIAL rights…privileges, that is (rights without concomitant necessity of accountability). And if you CAN’T discern this reality, especially regarding whimmin in The United States, I’m more worried about the “totalitarianism of dumbness” than that of the murderous, robbing Illuminati banksters running the show.
In this country (USA) we ARE currently structured (thanks to a “higher” agenda, and whining by “special” interest groups) on the tenet that we’re all equal, intelligence-wise or otherwise – to the extent that if “someone” isn’t, screams of discrimination are sounded, and every effort is made, monetarily and otherwise, to “eeequaaalize” those seen as “not receiving the same ‘benefit’ as others.” (This cannot work, because of the enormous costs and logistics involved, due not only to root congenital genetic differences, but also because of the individual inclinations and motivations of those you’re trying to make equal). It’s true – way too many people don’t understand the difference between equality of opportunity (whimmin have more) and equality of OUTCOME.
So, you can fairly state that a lot of what we post on here is tenaciously mean and vile – but it’s merely a reflection back on a/those society(s) which underVALUES men and their significant contributions (based on biological difference, not discrimination – most inventions, for instance, started out with somebody tinkering with existing objects readily available in homes, or via concepts whose inception were pen and paper – tools readily available to men AND whimmin) and a rant on that society which deems whimmin more “special”…please!
But hey – if you’re interested in reading cheap shots, delusions of grandeur, and incessant whining about (non-existent) discrimination (again, whimmin ADMIT DEFEAT by accepting SPECIAL PRIVILEGE…they subconsciously know we are superior), then head on over to the whimmin’s forums (that’ll fill ya quick…and prove THIS a relative famine).
If you are, however, interested in actual facts regarding men’s greatness, pull your head out of that romance novel, or your nozzle away from that “Lifetime” movie, and click this link to view how men don’t need to take a mile (special privileges), when inches (naturally marginal to high superiority over whimmin) will do:
http://christianparty.net/menare.htm
societiesdissolvewithoutmen
being smarter by inches is like winning in a race by seconds, it doesnt sound like much but it’s actually being ahead by a large margin
I often find myself saying “God damn it, I won’t apologize for having a dick” and its usually over stupid shit like when I piss in the sink. My wife came in and caught me pissing in the sink and said “you sick mother fucker, I wash my face in that god damn sink” and I said “if I’m the sick one why are YOU washing YOUR FACE where I piss?” I for one refuse to say sorry for having a dick.
Not all women are bat shit nuts but a lot of them are.
http://www.resurrectisis.org/J1WebPage.htm
No feminist no masculinist just trying to bring understanding. I am tired of base stereotyping on both sides of the coin, if men and women get their thrill of this, it says alot about the state of both genders and how useless human kind has evolved.
Schemas
Schemas are an individual’s worldview. Many deviant crimes begin with the offender’s negative schemas that constantly bring him closer to offending. Rapists often have schemas that include a negative image of their victims such as, “All women are [derogatory comment here]“, or “she deserved it because…” are often heard in the statements made by offenders. In these cases, the offender’s schema dictates that since one woman in his life provided this example justifying his statement, all other women must be the same.
Schemas in offenders provide a vast resource for feelings of anger, resentment, or any other belief that could cause one to offend. Schemas also go a long way toward giving the offender material for justifying, minimizing or blaming the victim for the crime. Offender often state that the victim “deserves” this or that, generalize a negative trait to all women/children or even minimize the amount of force because sex is “supposed to be rough”. In other cases an offender may minimize offenses because he “didn’t hurt her”. In these cases, the offender is referring to the physical force and not taking into consideration the emotional strain of the victim.
Therapeutically, schemas are important to recognize and attempt to confront, challenge and dismantle. Creating a genogram (a visual representation of the individual’s family of origin, much like a family tree) provides some insight and understanding for the client and clinician to explore relationships, events, and family dynamics that led to the current negative schema. When a genogram is completed properly, it often reveals patterns of behavior/thinking that ws passed down from one generation to the next.
At first, it may seem as though this is “passing the buck” and blaming another (parent) for the offender’s actions. Yet, it is important to the offender to recognize that he must take responsibility for his actions and the continuation of the negative schemas. An understanding of this concept often provides an offender with a beginning point to breaking the cycle.
In our next article, I will present a genogram and the effectiveness of using this intervention.
Site Meter
“Rapists often have schemas that include a negative image of their victims such as, “All women are [derogatory comment here]“, or “she deserved it because…” are often heard in the statements made by offenders. In these cases, the offender’s schema dictates that since one woman in his life provided this example justifying his statement, all other women must be the same.”
These offenders’ schemas also lack the notion that any statements made to police officers can and probably were used against them in a court of law.
When you “colored it in” you did not realize that the line graph was showing that women’s IQ is higher in their younger years and the men’s IQ was higher in their older years.
Your website is completely clouded by your bias to the point of not even entertaining an idea that in fact women and men are different but neither is superior. I would have to assume you have a self-esteem issue, since this website is obviously insecure and you use more humor than facts.
I am sorry that you are a pathetic human being and that your mom was a dumb ass women and your father was a dumb ass man and now you’re healing your confidence through malice and ignorance.
“When you “colored it in” you did not realize that the line graph was showing that women’s IQ is higher in their younger years and the men’s IQ was higher in their older years.”
HA HA HA HA… I think you comment nailed the point of this site.
Check the graph fool. The horizontal graph section is about IQ points NOT Age.
Wow. You totally failed at reading a graph. Way to go. That’s what 5% gets you.
Pasteurized milk, Louis Pasteur.
The domestication of cows was probably also pioneered by a man.
What the hell is up with the cow in the picture?
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/01/050121100142.htm
The study shows women having more white matter and men more gray matter related to intellectual skill, revealing that no single neuroanatomical structure determines general intelligence and that different types of brain designs are capable of producing equivalent intellectual performance.
“These findings suggest that human evolution has created two different types of brains designed for equally intelligent behavior,” said Richard Haier, professor of psychology in the Department of Pediatrics and longtime human intelligence researcher, who led the study with colleagues at UCI and the University of New Mexico. “In addition, by pinpointing these gender-based intelligence areas, the study has the potential to aid research on dementia and other cognitive-impairment diseases in the brain.”
Study results appear on the online version of NeuroImage.
In general, men have approximately 6.5 times the amount of gray matter related to general intelligence than women, and women have nearly 10 times the amount of white matter related to intelligence than men. Gray matter represents information processing centers in the brain, and white matter represents the networking of – or connections between – these processing centers.
This, according to Rex Jung, a UNM neuropsychologist and co-author of the study, may help to explain why men tend to excel in tasks requiring more local processing (like mathematics), while women tend to excel at integrating and assimilating information from distributed gray-matter regions in the brain, such as required for language facility. These two very different neurological pathways and activity centers, however, result in equivalent overall performance on broad measures of cognitive ability, such as those found on intelligence tests.
The study also identified regional differences with intelligence. For example, 84 percent of gray-matter regions and 86 percent of white-matter regions involved with intellectual performance in women were found in the brain’s frontal lobes, compared to 45 percent and zero percent for males, respectively. The gray matter driving male intellectual performance is distributed throughout more of the brain.
According to the researchers, this more centralized intelligence processing in women is consistent with clinical findings that frontal brain injuries can be more detrimental to cognitive performance in women than men. Studies such as these, Haier and Jung add, someday may help lead to earlier diagnoses of brain disorders in males and females, as well as more effective and precise treatment protocols to address damage to particular regions in the brain.
For this study, UCI and UNM combined their respective neuroimaging technology and subject pools to study brain morphology with magnetic resonance imaging. MRI scanning and cognitive testing involved subjects at UCI and UNM. Using a technique called voxel-based morphometry, Haier and his UCI colleagues converted these MRI pictures into structural brain “maps” that correlated brain tissue volume with IQ.
Dr. Michael T. Alkire and Kevin Head of UCI and Ronald A. Yeo of UNM participated in the study, which was supported in part by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
About the University of California, Irvine: The University of California, Irvine is a top-ranked public university dedicated to research, scholarship and community service. Founded in 1965, UCI is among the fastest-growing University of California campuses, with more than 24,000 undergraduate and graduate students and about 1,400 faculty members. The second-largest employer in dynamic Orange County, UCI contributes an annual economic impact of $3 billion.
“This, according to Rex Jung, a UNM neuropsychologist and co-author of the study, may help to explain why men tend to excel in tasks requiring more local processing (like mathematics), while women tend to excel at integrating and assimilating information from distributed gray-matter regions in the brain, such as required for language facility.”
In other words, women excel mainly at talking. No argument there.
Dick Masterson says:
Kevlar is useless without guns.
No, it’s not. Kevlar is used for many other things besides bullet-proof vests such as:
helmets, trampolines, tires, tennis rackets, puncture-resistant bicycle tires and is used in composite body parts for the racing and aerospace industries. It is also used in brake and transmission friction parts, gaskets, ropes and cables, fiber optic cables, circuit board reinforcement and automotive belts and hoses. Try doing a little research next time.
Some geneticists think the Y chromosome is now little more than a genetic wasteland that will eventually just disappear. If that were to happen, it would certainly spell the end of sexual reproduction.
But David Page of MIT’s Whitehead Institute vigorously disagrees. “At the same time that it is continuing to lose genes, it’s found some new ways of replenishing itself,” Page says.
Last year, Page and his colleagues reported a finding that brightened the outlook for the future of men: The Y chromosome has been secretly creating backup copies of its most important genes. These are stored in the DNA as mirror images, or palindromes — which read the same way forwards and backwards. (”Madam, I’m Adam” is a famous example.)
In Y chromosome palindromes, the first half contains the gene and the second half contains the same information, just in reverse.
That means that many of the genes on the Y chromosome do occur as pairs. Page says members of these pairs appear to be swapping out or recombining with each other — allowing the genes to repair themselves when they get damaged.
Page says this helps explain why these genes have been able to persist despite millions of years of assault from random mutations. And, he says, it means the Y chromosome won’t simply keep shrinking away until it disappears altogether.
Quoted from : http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4225769
Yeah, it’s not going anywhere any time soon.
When did you last have sex with a black person?
It’s a joke? You just keep telling yourself that.
Please don’t ever write “all of the sudden” again. It is “all of a sudden”. A man is saying it to other men, and so it shall be. Man it up.
When I found out about this site, I have to admit I was offended hence I am a woman. Yet the more I read, the more I realize how much of a joke this is. To truly be offended, I would have to believe that all men are sadly this hateful and ignorant. Of course, my womanly denial forced me to laugh and find the dark comedy among all this.
At the end of the day, I could laugh or boil with rage but it wouldn’t matter either way because as we all know the Y chromosome is shrinking each year. One of these days, poof, all the men are gone.
Enjoy your last days on the earth, men.
Who do you think you are to judge people?
I claimed no wealth, i search for no equal.
you insult me and assume superiority.
you’re nothing but a sad voice on an empty page.
enjoy your self-built fortress of misery, your ignorance betrays you.
She’s just having a bad hair day. Sure some children are starving in Africa, but she’s a cum-gargling manhole.
Haha, Moron.
Actually I’m working.
Second I didn’t go through the website, fuck I don’t need to. The youtube movie of Dick just describe him and the whole entire website in a nice measly few minutes.
But besides that are you going to reply to my other comments or just ignore them like a retarded baby.