Greatness Comes in Inches
Greatness Comes in Inches. That’s a bit of subtle penis humor for you, but it’s also true.
Being an inch short for a roller coaster means waiting a year to try again. Missing Hitler by an inch with your 1903 Springfield sniper rifle means your kids are playing Wolfenstein with German keyboards. If the milkman had missed Lynne Spears’ vagina by an inch, there would be no Britney.
Anal is the only form of birth control shown to be 100% effective. Even abstinence failed once.
In the case of IQ, science has shown men to be smarter than women by mere inches. Even though women act like retarded monkeys, they don’t test like them. Still, what does “mere inches” actually look like? I’ll bet it’s fucking enormous.
That’s another bit of subtle penis humor for you.
Men have more grey matter in their brains than women. Man scientists proved it and I brought it to you like Moses under a hail of feminist denial. Men have statistically higher IQs and are statistically more often geniuses. Once again, man science proved it and I repeated it. I also shut that fat bitch’s yap on Dr. Phil.
Men are better than women.
The following graph is a combination of different studies done on adult intelligence. On average, men are five IQ points smarter than women. Male intelligence is also more widely distributed than women, meaning that men are more likely to vary from the average intelligence of 103. Women, with their ability to interpret everything wrong and in their favor, claim this wider distribution to be proof that men are more often geniuses and more often idiots.
Wrong.
Also, women say that five IQ points is not really a big deal.
Let’s see just how big of a deal 5 IQ points are. This is how you take math and shove it up women’s ass.
I’ll be the first to admit, when the average intelligence levels of men and women are graphed with a bunch of boring lines and a boring piss yellow background, it doesn’t look like a big deal. But look at what happened after I colored it in.
All of the sudden, women look dumb as shit.
The Wave of Genius
Women are dumb as shit. That gigantic blue curtain up there that hovers menacingly over women and their stupidity like it’s waiting to show them how to press the big fucking green button on the fax machine that says “Fax” in order to fax something — or better yet, how to access a file on the shared network drive without moving it’s entire contents onto their local computer and then leaving for a three day weekend. That blue fuck-you is something I like to call the Wave of Genius.
The Wave of Genius is made up of mere inches, but it also gave us algebra and pesticides. “Mere inches” gave us irrigation, plumbing, bronze, the internet, airplanes and X-Ray machines. “Mere inches” gave us Caddyshack and it gave us this website. If men are consistently better than women by 5%, that means men invented and conceived of everything 5% faster than women.
Which means men created everything.
1% can be a huge number. Condoms fail 2% of the time when used perfectly, and that’s a big fucking percent. Trust me. 5%? I don’t even want to think about paying for five abortions. One is expensive enough.
Using advanced CSI photo analyzing techniques, I was able to take a closer look at the Wave of Genius. Look at what happened when I zoomed in on the massive gap between men and women at the 132 IQ range.
Enhance.
Enhance.
Enhance.
If you’re surprised by that, you’re a woman. Fuck off my website.
Thanks to Rodrigo de la Jara for the graph.
And thanks to Anonymous for this:
UPDATE:
Woman reading this article: “I can’t believe you put Isaac Newton in there in front of Jesus.”
Me: “That’s Einstein.”
Men are better than women.
Related Articles:
April 14th, 2008 at 3:12 pm - IP Man-Hash: 0004faa2551cc
More like Gods biggest mistake.
April 14th, 2008 at 3:15 pm - IP Man-Hash: 0004faa2551cc
Your mums a whore.
April 14th, 2008 at 7:18 pm - IP Man-Hash: cc1d350da2aab
No, stupid women like you often get confused and think women are better than men, so Dick helps retarded whores like you out.
April 15th, 2008 at 12:30 pm - IP Man-Hash: 984d2faf2ac07
Since there seems to be a lot of intelligent people here, I would like to find out your views ( but it would be much nicer if somebody had some real info), about a topic that has some scientists nervous. I recently watched a discovery channel show about lizards called Desert Grassland Whiptails, which have phased out males all together. Now we all know that there are asexual creatures, but this is something different. The female lizards do mate, but with each other. One lizard will take on the role of the female and the other will assume the role of the male, mimicking the same postures as males during mating. Lesbian lizards, if you will. Over several weeks, they will switch out and reverse roles. The resulting offspring are clones of the mother. This is something that has happened through evolution, ( not bitchy feminist lizards). During the course of thier evolution, males were at some point deemed obsolete. Now, while some of you like to undermine the importance of females in reproduction, nature, at least at this level is finding ways to exterminate the male species. Of coarse this isn’t something we will see any time soon in humans, however some scientists believe the same fate may eventually fall on the human race. Furthuremore, I saw an article (unfortunately I didn’t read it) that mentioned something about women being able to sprint as fast as men by the the year 2200. Is there an endless sea of butch, self sterilizing women in our future? I already know enough about the lizards, but does anyone know anything on evolutionary changes occuring in women? Is this a real threat to mankind?
April 15th, 2008 at 1:00 pm - IP Man-Hash: ffc820499bead
Yeah, yeah. Any day now women will be able to run as fast as men in a sprint. And, for forty years it has been said any day now women will be able to run faster marathons than men. Yet, recently they gave women a 20 minute head start ahead of the men, so at least one woman would finish first. When the first woman who had the twenty minute head start crossed the line, she was called the winner of the race.
The Huns are coming, and they aren’t going to be nice about this.
April 15th, 2008 at 1:06 pm - IP Man-Hash: a5f3a30b88dc6
Well, according to Ernst Mayr, in his book “What Evolution is”, many sexually reproducing species throughout the half million of years of animal and plant evolution have “tried” asexual reproduction but it has not been ever completely committed to by that metazoan species. There are some animals and plants out there that engage in asexual reproduction (eg your example of lizards and a poster on this site named Commander Scott) but always engage in sexual reproduction. I guess the view is that despite advantages of asexual reproduction (greater numbers of children per parent), sexual is greatly favored, possibly because of the mixing of genes that occurs in the children from both parents make them more resistant to viruses and other pathogens.
My guess is that men will always be physically stronger than women as this is inevitably dependent on the Y chromosome. Its hard for me to imagine that women could ever be, on average, naturally physically stronger than men because they do not have a Y chromosome.
Evolution of course occurs extremely slowly so I think its unlikely that there will be naturally asexually reproducing women in our near future, but based on precedent in other species I guess it could happen in say 50,000 yrs or so.
April 15th, 2008 at 1:12 pm - IP Man-Hash: a5f3a30b88dc6
Correction: change half million to half billion years of animal and plant evolution
April 15th, 2008 at 1:37 pm - IP Man-Hash: 984d2faf2ac07
Yeah, I also read that these lizards will not evolve because of the way they reproduce. But doesn’t “survival of the fittest” apply at least most of the time? Why would a species evolve in such a way that is not benificial? I know its not the first time it has happened, but it still makes for a good conversation. Anyway, thanks for your thoughtful response, no manhole, you seem to be a smart guy.
April 15th, 2008 at 1:40 pm - IP Man-Hash: 984d2faf2ac07
P.S.
You don’t need to correct yourself as I am not going to pick at your info/grammer. I got the point of what you were saying. (I hate it when people do that!)
April 15th, 2008 at 1:44 pm - IP Man-Hash: 984d2faf2ac07
ITS HALF A BILLION>>>DUMBASS
Commander Scott
April 15th, 2008 at 1:47 pm - IP Man-Hash: a5f3a30b88dc6
Your point is a good one, and hopefully you will get the opinion of other posters. Your point is, as far as I can tell, why don’t asexually reproducing creatures overrun sexually reproducing creatures? I’m not exactly sure, but now I recall that Matt Ridley in his book has a whole chapter devoted to this question and related issues in his book “The Red Queen”.
I know with humans that asexual reproduction would be dangerous for our species. The belief is if you have some kind of deadly virus that escapes from the jungles of Congo, it will never have complete 100% mortality. The reason is though to be the mixing of components of the immune system from both mother and father to a child that will be “co-dominant” for both sets of genes, in other words, the child has the advantages of both parents. Different individuals in the population have different kinds of biochemical advantages, so there will always be a few select number of humans left surviving a plague, ala “The Stand”. I guess this would apply to lizards as well as I recall they have immune systems that are almost as complex as ours.
April 15th, 2008 at 1:49 pm - IP Man-Hash: a5f3a30b88dc6
I corrected this, dip-shit. You want to add some information here. Dont bull-shit now.
April 15th, 2008 at 3:01 pm - IP Man-Hash: d653cff06dec4
The Arabs are only filling a niche requisite in society that white males are cowering from in record numbers.
April 15th, 2008 at 5:02 pm - IP Man-Hash: a5f3a30b88dc6
@cop stash- I did a little further research and learned that the whiptail reproduction is considered asexual. The reason is that although a female mounts another female, the other individual does not contribute genetic information (DNA) to the mother who has the egg that will become offspring. Apparently, this egg will undergo parthenogenesis to become an offspring. So although there is courtship between females all the DNA comes from only one individual, so its considered asexual.
April 15th, 2008 at 7:08 pm - IP Man-Hash: 0d1a7984bea37
It seems to me that that the “default” argument women have against this website is that the men sharing the same view are bitter that they are unable to get a woman.
I’m sorry… But that makes as much sense as a white supremacist saying they hate blacks because they want to be black.
Disliking something because it’s inaccessable is a distinctly female behavior. I don’t know how many times I’ve heard women say they “hate” a man that recently broke up with them.
In all truth, men that are desperately in love with women end up having less sex. Is it attractive for a man you’re dating to constantly call you saying how much they adore you? How about wanting to spend every available second by your side? No. These are not male characteristics.
April 15th, 2008 at 9:36 pm - IP Man-Hash: c067a56cf8060
HAHA! Simply fucking great.
April 16th, 2008 at 5:03 am - IP Man-Hash: d653cff06dec4
Thank you.
April 16th, 2008 at 11:50 am - IP Man-Hash: fac5230ff723d
You speak the truth, and your words open a few doors for my mind. Thank you.
April 16th, 2008 at 2:42 pm - IP Man-Hash: 30639bae744c0
What you say makes absolutely no sense at all. Women are just as smart as men. At my school alone there was a girl who got 100% on her ACT’s. You must not know very many women to think so low of them. Even if the only women you have known weren’t the best it’s unfair to just use them as your example for ALL women. Just because there are a lot of asshole men doesn’t mean all men are assholes. Just because there are stupid women doesn’t mean all women are stupid. Get the correlation?
Oh and how come you say you’re classy yet you curse so often? It really isn’t necessary, if you’re serious about your point, you only make yourself sound a lot less educated and it makes it harder for people to take you seriously.
April 16th, 2008 at 2:52 pm - IP Man-Hash: 3e8d1e2b2a4c4
Mr. Dick Masterson,
I can see that the inspiration for this blog is directly based on my somewhat lengthy defense of male intellectual superiority against the lesser evolved minds of certain women who patrol this site. Well, I’m glad my philosophical discussion of female intellectual inferiority has been of tremendous value to you. As a man, I salute you!
HEIL MASTERSON! HEIL DER FUEHRER MASTERSON!