men are better than women in every way , women like listening themselves talking , that’s pathetic.

Commander Scott said:

The notion that women are much more verbally gifted than men is a disgusting tissue of lies

I agree. In my experience, women basically communicate by stringing together cliches, even when those cliches don’t make sense in that context. It’s boring to listen to.

Commander Scott said:

osirisofthesun said:

Bryan M said:

Neil said:
That’s why women outperform men in verbal SATs.

This is a myth. You haven’t been following along.

Quite true. Men have always performed better on the traditional math and verbal sections of the SAT, but women did better on the new essay section.

Nonsense! Men not only have greater mathematical abilities than women, but also have greater verbal abilities than women as well. After all, how does one explain the fact that all of the world’s greatest literature was authored exclusively by men? Or that all of the world’s greatest orators were men?

The notion that women are much more verbally gifted than men is a disgusting tissue of lies; everyone knows that the SAT, as administered in the United States, was deliberately dumbed down by gender feminists in order to give women an edge in the educational system.

I have heard that too. I think that they just added new sections to try and “even out” the scores. Why is that necessary? I suppose that the feminists didn’t want to admit that girls didn’t perform as well in any section of the SAT. That’s why the entire test was revamped recently.

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0883611.html

According to this link, women did considerably worse in math. They also had an average score of 502 in the verbal section, but men had an average score of 505. I believe the new “writing section” refers to an essay of some sort. Women scored 502 in this section as well, but men had an average of 491.

The grading for this section may be more subjective. In fact, the higher scores indicate that this section was deliberately added to give women an edge in some way.

osirisofthesun said:

Bryan M said:

Neil said:
That’s why women outperform men in verbal SATs.

This is a myth. You haven’t been following along.

Quite true. Men have always performed better on the traditional math and verbal sections of the SAT, but women did better on the new essay section.

Nonsense! Men not only have greater mathematical abilities than women, but also have greater verbal abilities than women as well. After all, how does one explain the fact that all of the world’s greatest literature was authored exclusively by men? Or that all of the world’s greatest orators were men?

The notion that women are much more verbally gifted than men is a disgusting tissue of lies; everyone knows that the SAT, as administered in the United States, was deliberately dumbed down by gender feminists in order to give women an edge in the educational system.

Bryan M said:

Neil said:
That’s why women outperform men in verbal SATs.

This is a myth. You haven’t been following along.

Quite true. Men have always performed better on the traditional math and verbal sections of the SAT, but women did better on the new essay section.

Some women have accomplished venerable things, but men have accomplished far more.

Sorry, ladies, but even if a woman is the “first female” to do something, her gender is relevant because women don’t accomplish as much as men in general.

The exception proves the rule: men are better than women.

Thank you bola.

Here it is: Lesbian Separatism

bola said:

irlandes said:

Most sexism today is discrimination against men. and the only thing not done to men is kill them in large numbers which has been seriously discussed by feminists.

It’s true. Read about Lesbian Separatism.

From the article:

Some women talk about the possible need for violent confrontation with men to overthrow their power. For a few it has involved consideration of killing men in large numbers. I feel that this idea or fantasy has arisen from feelings of isolation connected with a ghetto lifestyle, a preoccupation with men’s violence towards women, impatience for change and the fear that merely separating off will not be enough to force it. It relies on an analysis which identifies men as the cause of all the worlds problems. This ultimate solution is linked to biological determinism which asserts that men are incapable of change.

What does one say about such ideas? It is so disturbing to see such authoritarian madness emerging in a context that purports to be part of feminist or women’s liberationist thought. Two women I spoke to wanted a world without men and had contemplated killing them - but they feared women would not survive a direct confrontation. They also had reservations because a lot of women wouldn’t want it. One woman said, “If I want to exterminate them all, do I want to kill my father? I’d find it hard. One reason is I’ve had good times with him.” Both these women didn’t like the idea of killing anyone themselves.

An Irish woman writes, “the idea of killing and/or physically challenging male hatred of women is paralyzingly scary … I find it much easier to contemplate the idea of implanting all men with haemophilia or something . . . the process of violence could so brutalize women that we might use our power against each other . . . I think that having lived in Ireland, I’m very wary of traditional revolutionary tactics like bombing, kneecapping and the like and so I’m continually aware of the yawning gulf between theory and practice that seems to pervade my thinking.”

While I want to bump this to show new visiters how backwards women are, I also want to point out that that link doesn’t work for some reason.

Megan said:

You are truly disgusting. Amelia Earhart was a hero in her own right, I don’t see you doing anything close to what she accomplished in her short life. You obviously have some deep, deep emotional issues and I will pray for you. You need help, and I sincerely hope you will get it. Women have achieved so much, and contributed so much to society. So have men. We will never have a perfect, or even relatively happy society, if people like you keep spreading hate and dissension around the world.

Just out of a little personal interest, I have a few questions for you:

What do you think of Lesbians? What about gay men, and the gay community in general?

There were three seniors in my school last year, all girls that got perfect scores on their SATs. What did you get on your SAT?

I really am curious, and I hope you’ll answer me in a cordial fashion. Although, with your chauvinistic attitude, I don’t really see that happening.

Amelia Earhart’s greatest achievement was that she made herself disappear. Maybe one day female David Copperfield wannabe’s will Master the fine Art of how to re-appear :)

Neil said:
That’s why women outperform men in verbal SATs.

This is a myth. You haven’t been following along.

Feminazis indeed.
Same shit different pussy.

bola said:

It’s true. Read about Lesbian Separatism.

From the article:

… Two women I spoke to wanted a world without men and had contemplated killing them - but they feared women would not survive a direct confrontation. They also had reservations because a lot of women wouldn’t want it. One woman said, “If I want to exterminate them all, do I want to kill my father? I’d find it hard. One reason is I’ve had good times with him.” Both these women didn’t like the idea of killing anyone themselves.

Hahahahahaha!! This is probably the most hilarious feminazi quote I have ever seen. Essentially admitting that women are weaker than men; admitting that their sick ideology is confined to the margins and not taken seriously by most women; admitting that there is no actual reason for their agenda since it is possible to have “good times” with some men; and then finally, the crowning touch … “I don’t want to do it myself, can someone else do it for me?”

This is so funny
you just prove than men are idiots
what havent gotten any pussy latley is that why your PMSing?
your’re so full of it

irlandes said:

Most sexism today is discrimination against men. and the only thing not done to men is kill them in large numbers which has been seriously discussed by feminists.

It’s true. Read about Lesbian Separatism.

From the article:

Some women talk about the possible need for violent confrontation with men to overthrow their power. For a few it has involved consideration of killing men in large numbers. I feel that this idea or fantasy has arisen from feelings of isolation connected with a ghetto lifestyle, a preoccupation with men’s violence towards women, impatience for change and the fear that merely separating off will not be enough to force it. It relies on an analysis which identifies men as the cause of all the worlds problems. This ultimate solution is linked to biological determinism which asserts that men are incapable of change.

An Irish woman writes, “the idea of killing and/or physically challenging male hatred of women is paralyzingly scary … I find it much easier to contemplate the idea of implanting all men with haemophilia or something . . . the process of violence could so brutalize women that we might use our power against each other . . . I think that having lived in Ireland, I’m very wary of traditional revolutionary tactics like bombing, kneecapping and the like and so I’m continually aware of the yawning gulf between theory and practice that seems to pervade my thinking.”

You said, Meow, we men aren’t great. The problem is not our performance. If one of us learned how to leap tall buildings at a single bound, you fiends would complain it was a short building and therefore didn’t count.

My kids all have college degrees. I am the first to do so in direct lineage. One kid has a Ph.D in mathematics. Another is in his third year of med school. One girl has a Master’s degree in Science education. The other has a 4 year diploma. My siblings children have about 1/3 degrees. So, I did great at getting my kids higher on the food chain than I was. So, how many times has any female told me, “Good job, irlandes.” Har, har.

My 66 year old wife came back after a month’s visit to her small grandson’s house in the States. We had a minor honeymoon, and I thought , wow, she gave me a great time. But, I thought later about what really happened, and it was I who gave her a great time. She just lay there, moving in sync, and I did all the talented stuff.

Yet, no matter how good a time a man gives his wife, he is supposed to thank her and give her presents.

Years ago, there were times when she made it good for me, and I sure let her know every single thing that was good, so she knew instantly what worked and what didn’t work, instead of finding out three days later something wasn’t good like we men do. The only way we men know if something is working is when she absolutely can’t suppress her moans and gasps of delight. When a man doesn’t do well because he has no feedback as to things to do, he is told he, not she, is a bad lover.

In case you haven’t followed this, men are even better lovers than women.

meow said:

While everyone on this site picks out the MANipulated flaws of women I would much rather dissect the many flaws of the repugnant male in the above photograph. The extensive balding that is occurring is only draws more attention to his already massive forehead. He might want to join “The Hair Club For Men.” Maybe there he could meet some real friends instead of sitting in front of his computer every night talking to men via website. Between the wanna-be sheriff glasses, awkwardly large & deformed shaped nose, & hideous mustach he looks like he’s wearing one of those funny glasses you buy at the joke store that mockingly have the same disgraceful features as he. I don’t believe this person has a jawline either. It appears more like his skin is just hanging from his cheekbones. He better watch out for a double chin, if its not there already, its certainly on its way! Also a shave & a shower might do this man well. Oh & maybe some Botox for those hainous smile lines.

THIS IS DIRECTED TO EVERYONE PROMOTING THIS SITE &/OR ITS IDEAS:
Men, you all must realize just because some greatest people in history were of the male gender DOESN’T mean that you are great to. An individual should (& outside of your little fantasy site IS) based on their accomplishments, having nothing to do with their SEX, race, oreintation, relgioin, ethnencity, or any other rideoulous factor you can think of. The nativity everyone in favor of this site has it just increadable. Reguardless of what all of you think there is a large, vast world out there where gender discrimination is becoming more & more rare everyday. The United States had a woman in the race to become president. I don’t know what time era you people are living in BUT WAKE UP & GET THE FUCK OUT OF IT BECASUE ITS GONE.

Peace.

Sex discrimination is INCREASING every day. Your sexist viewpoint is clearly that sexism is discrimination against women. Most sexism today is discrimination against men. and the only thing not done to men is kill them in large numbers which has been seriously discussed by feminists.

MABTW exists because for forty years we have heard from you dearies how inferior and evil we men are. Dick is pointing out men actually do almost everything important that gets done.

You dearies can’t even read NO WOMEN ALLOWED.

….awesome.

meow said:
Men, you all must realize just because some greatest people in history were of the male gender DOESN’T mean that you are great to. An individual should based on their accomplishments, having nothing to do with their SEX, race, oreintation, relgioin, ethnencity, or any other rideoulous factor you can think of.

Gratuitous spelling and gramar errors aside, I agree with this fully.

Let’s apply this to Amelia Earhart and Frank Monroe Hawks.

1) Frank Monroe Hawks was a Lieutenant Commander in World War I, set the west to east transcontinental airspeed record in a Northrop Gamma, and took 23-year-old Amelia Earhart on her first airplane ride at a state fair. He died in a crash also, in East Aurora, New York. Statue? Nope, no statue.

2) Amelia Earhart flew west and crashed in Hawaii. Tried again, dissapeared near New Guinea. Statue? You bet!

For extra points, see if you can find Fred Noonan’s statue somewhere!

It’s too bad the people who made Amelia’s statue don’t agree with you, meow. Even though there are many more people worthy of statues in our history, she got hers because of her SEX.

-Rawkstah

meow said:
An individual should (& outside of your little fantasy site IS) based on their accomplishments

Yeah, Hillary Clinton was a candidate because of her accomplishments.

The problem is that if everybody got what they deserved, most women would be back at the kitchen sink in no time. Everybody knows this. That’s why competition is no longer allowed and we structure society more and more through affirmative action and quotas.