It’s All Downhill From Here
It’s part of human nature to go through a midlife crisis. You’re old, you’re bald, you’re comfortable in your job and your marriage; the only thing that will cure your woes is a brand new convertible.
Notice how I didn’t say “affair”. That’s how women go through their midlife crises. Men buy a cool new toy to toot around town with — maybe ruffle the feathers of the establishment as they blow through yellow lights at 65 miles an hour. Women fuck up their families.
I was doing some research on this topic and I found that the average age of a midlife crisis for a man is 46. That’s perfectly reasonable, I thought. That’s right at the point where a man realizes that the big drop in the roller coaster of life was at the beginning and no one told him to stick his hands in the air for it. He should have realized it because of the huge climb, but that’s not how it works. It’s over now and the rest of the ride is just humps and cheesy little jerks that make your neck hurt.
‘Keep your hands in the car at all times,’ haunts his dreams.
So a man does what a man does best: solves the problem. He buys an enormous TV or a ride on a helicopter or a sky diving 10 trip pass that gets used twice until he herniates his back and then everything is good like gravy in a matter of years.
Women, however, are different.
The average age of a woman’s midlife crisis is 17. It’s at that point when women get that glazed look over their eyes and start talking about ridiculous things like goals and dreams and a bunch of other bullshit that they have absolutely no intention of doing and aren’t to be taken seriously by any man over the age of 12. Men do that during their midlife crises too. They say things like, “I’m going to be a painter.” Of course he’s not going to be a painter. It is only a whim of silliness to be indulged for as long as it takes for him to realize that. That’s exactly how it is when a young girl says things like, “I want to be a lawyer” or “I want to be a doctor” or “I believe in animal’s rights!” Sure you do honey. Sure you do. Maybe we should give them the right to vote!
Of course I’m kidding. An animal shouldn’t be allowed to vote any more than a woman should be allowed to vote. Donkey’s and women vote in exactly the same way. A donkey will punch any chad you want for a carrot. Women just need a — well I’m sure you all already know.
A man’s midlife crisis is a desperate and brief act to reclaim a life he once had. That’s a woman’s entire life: desperation and grabbing onto straws that not only don’t exist, but never existed at all. For men, however, it is also a time to reflect on what stupendous things that he has accomplished throughout his life. A family, a career, a hilarious and amorously promiscuous neighbor friend with a funny catch phrase — these are the things a man will take stock of during a midlife crisis.
The only thing women realize during theirs is that they’ve never fucked a black guy.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 5 4 3 [2] 1 » Show All
Female is just another whore, ill judge her for what shes said, she doesnt fuck black guys to go beyond boundarys of ethnicity. She just want one thing a big big black cock. Shes just a whore for pleasure and then she will not condone a man seeking pleasure with a woman. Shel say were all sexist when we call them bitches and whores, and then they call us pigs, and assholes. Theres a double standard for men that we have to be gentlemen and take what we can get (nothing) and be happy that we treated some girl with respect. Female do you plan on marrying some nice white man sometime? How you think hes gonna react when he finds out you fucked some black guy and your tube looks like a damn sink hole. No man wants a woman thats a vicious whore so you can screw who ever you want nobody cares because nobody wants to fuck you by now.
Ya your a slut
I think I saw a pussycat.
Because men are better than women
Because every woman is a cheating whore.
WRONG!!!!!
Men will vote with sense, based on the issues. Women have no sense, and would vote for Hitler. See the difference now?
Therefore, you should probably stay away from a site that clearly says:
No Women Allowed: Ladies as always, this site is totally off limits.
Now, run along and make yourself useful for once; go fetch a nice cold beer for a man.
How is it different when a man or a woman votes? They should both have the right to. I refuse to give my real name out, because many of the people on this site would probably use it to ridicule and tease me.
I am adding on my second comment. It is not okay for men to sleep around and it is not okay for women to, either. However, it happens with both genders because of society and choices people make.
How many men get away with having a lot of one-night stands while women have to hear about it from many people, men and women? Men have premarital and nonmarital sexual relationships also, so why do women have to hear about it more than men?
Why can’t women have goals and dreams like men do? And you can have a happy life at eighteen or sixty-seven if you want to; it just depends on your actions, words, and thoughts.
Good point.
-Dick
I thought she already had and we were into the bonus round.
-wolfe
Right you are, diamatik. They won’t shut the fuck up about it. Eventually, Female will prove everything I’ve ever said on this site.
-Dick
Please recall the opening lines of All Women Are Whores Part II when Mr. Masterson mantastically stated:
Dick, we can all see what you mean clearly now. I thought she would never end, and then she posted again. This is the one of the main reasons that women are banned from this site.
In my view it’s not OK for either gender to “sleep around” casually.
I agree; I think women do want sex as much as men do.
Yes, females are diagnosed with depression far more than males. That said, males seem to have more extreme cases of it. Sad.
I judge some of what you’ve said in these forums re: sex, especially that despicable comment very negatively. I don’t judge you.
Judge not, lest ye be judged.
-wolfe
Many of you may argue that it isn’t biologically impossible for women not to sleep around or desire sex, based on a claim that women don’t appear to have the same levels of sexual desire as men do.
Regardless of that claim, I do not believe that it is biologically impossible for women not to want sex as often as men do. This is based on research which supports the view that people who have sex more often are happier than people who don’t. Regular sex stimulates the release of chemicals in the brain (possibly phenylaline or serotonin, no time for googling). These chemicals make one feel happier, thus, people who have sex more often, have these released more often, feel better more often and therefore supposedly would feel more keenly any reduction in these chemicals, thus spurring them onto to get the level back to a level they like, via the way of sex.
I don’t have time to find the research though I know it exists. I also do not know whether the release of the chemicals depends or not on achieving orgasm, though simply based on common sense, I assume so.
While this is very reductionist, if the same chemicals are released in men and women’s brains, upon orgasm, then, we would have to assume that both respond to this chemical and the lack of it in the same way, ie, wanting to get the level back up and experience ‘wellbeing’ and therefore desiring sex as often as each other. In fact, research supports the view that women experience depression compared to men at a ratio of 70:30. Based on these stats, one would imagine that women would desire sex even more often than men do. Though depression does also have a neg. effect on libido, therefore wiping out that theory. Perhaps what these stats are telling us is that women experience depression more often because they are not having normal amounts of sex (i.e. as often as men are) due to cultural constraints.
I do not have to justify, nor explain my actions to any of you. It is none of your business whether I had a De-Facto relationship, a casual fling, a one-night stand or a child with this person. While it may be human habit to judge others, my affairs are my affairs and who are any of you to judge me based on my sexual or personal life? Also, just to remind you, Dick doesn’t like the women here discussing their personal affairs/lives/days on this site, therefore, the minimum amount of information is appropriate. Your judgements mean nothing other than reveal to me your own judgemental and narrow minded biases.
Moreover, with respect to promiscuity, it is very revealing that your opinions reveal that to you, men equate promiscuous behaviour with an ego-wank based on how many women they have slept with and carved into the bedhead. It would be very rare to find a promiscuous women who desired attention for the number of her conquests. This has nothing to do with shame, more to do with the fact that the number means absolutely nothing and the understanding that sex really can be just sex. To men, though, it appears that they believe that the sheer number of sexual partners says something about their desirability and ability to attract even more.
We could therefore propose the hyp. that sexual partner quantity for men equates to his attractiveness (regardless of the fact that many of those partners might have been almost passed out from alcohol). For women, quanity, ego and emotions do not have to come into it. As women don’t advertise how many people they’ve slept with, sex can just be what it is.
If you think that says something about the women, then you are once again falling into the trap of thinking that it is okay for men to be sluts, in fact, it’s better than okay, it’s to be admired, but if women do it, they must be sluts and must be admonished. This is not only a double standard but it is biologically illogical and it is your somewhat unconscious desire to keep women controlled that motivates this belief.
Now, I know you all already believe that you are correct in thinking I am promiscuous. On this, I could defend myself, not out of a fear of wanting to escape cultural prejudices and abuse, but on rational grounds. However, as I have repeatedly said and will say again, I do not have to justify or explain myself and my sex life is no one’s business other than my sexual partner’s. However, I will heed off the abusive judgements and arguments against it being not acceptable for women to have multiple sexual partners.
I know you will argue that it is okay for men, but not for women to sleep around, based on.
1. Procreation. Can’t guarantee your progeny is actually yours.
To this I will say, that if men didn’t sleep around and kept to their own partner, then this little problem could be avoided.
2. If women sleep around, then men will be likely to remain doing so and this will result in lack of commitment/morals/family/community breakdown.
Again, this little problem could be solved if men didn’t agree to sleep with these women.
3. Sex shouldn’t be engaged in casually, doing so, erodes intimacy and has flow on effects in the community. People become more callous.
To this I would say that there is a difference between making love versus casual sex, there is no doubt about that. However, again, I think this depends on who you have casual sex with. What may be surprising to some of you is that a very high degree of intimacy can be obtained with near strangers, and sometimes more than what is possible with someone more familiar. Sad but true. I therefore believe you are very wrong in thinking that all people who engage in casual sex are shallow and superficial. As wolfe said, he is not going to be abstinant, assuming he means when he is not in a relationship. This therefore means that he would engage in casual sex. Based on just this fact, you would be very wrong to assume he is a superficial person, would you not? Yet, somehow you think basing a person’s actions in this regard tells you that they/he is shallow and promiscuous. People’s behaviours depend on context, so if you judge it outside of that, then you are judging, rather than understanding, and that judgement will be prone to an unknown degree of error.
Cool beans.
-wolfe
Thanks for the clarification. There is no longer any misunderstanding.
Diamatik, I’m very sorry to have responded so late, since your assumption is indeed mistaken.
OK, here goes.
I’ve no serious issue with “inter-racial” (I don’t like the term; we’re all the human race) relationships as long as those going into them are prepared to deal with slight additional complications — and they will exist, like it or not. Not to be so prepared is to be deluded over the sad nature of humanity, and to be ready for a more likely breakup. That said, the complications are fortunately slight these days.
As for any moral issues on inter-racial relationships, I’ve none. I see inter-cultural relationships as being more problematic. If one family values learning and the other doesn’t; if one family is filled with alcoholics and the other isn’t, then I see potential problems. A learned lily-white Russian vodka-snorting male is probably going to have problems with his new Utah-based (also lily-white) high-school educated Mormon bride.
Taking the example of a white woman and a black man (since it was the one given), you’ll get the gamut from the health-food store clerk saying “Your baby’s color is all wrong”, the disapproving mother, the friends of his sister utterly snubbing the new fiance/wife, recriminations to him from black women he knows for ‘marrying barbie’, accusations of ‘race traitor’ if he ever goes into politics, etc. Her friends will mostly be cautiously positive, but they’ll be a veneer of caution that probably wouldn’t be present with a white guy. Sadly, it’ll happen. Much from strangers, but some from friends.
So the couple’s going to have some things to deal with.
Now, I hope you’re seeing a point to my explanation above. To me, sex isn’t something you engage in casually. I won’t play “Mr Abstinence”, but you engage in sex if you want to explore forming a more lasting relationship with that person.
Dick’s point (to me at least) was not that “f-ing” a black guy was “low”, it was that for that woman, it was merely another notch on her bedpost. Something she wanted to do (and, in his example, hadn’t). Oh it’d have the very, very mild bonus I suppose of shocking her grandparents, and certainly of attracting attention, but honestly, who else these days is going to be remotely surprised or judgemental about an inter-racial relationship?
I thought he was being ridiculous in setting out that idea.
Then along came poor Female and fell right into his trap. I think she’s a decent person; why she posts here I’ll never know.
That said, she up’d and spoke of f-ing a black guy just as though it were yet another notch on her bedpost.
To me: no mention of relationship, no mention of commitment, no mention of thought, just “BANG — here’s his colo[u]r, quota filled”. That may not have been what she meant, but that was undeniably the way she came across.
When the lights are out (as they generally are when doing the deed), there’s no color. And I genuinely we’re all beloved (yet also horribly messed up) in God’s eyes.
I hope that explains how I see it (and how I think Dick sees it). I thank you for raising the point Diamtik; it’s a good one.
-wolfe
btw. I think you got a skewed pic. There was no man in the car. There should have been. One in particular comes to mind.
Yes. For one, making off with their (highly dubitable - let’s just say the) Porsche scotts free. You can always find another cock’s delight. The Cayanne though, that’s another can’o-worms altogether.
Plus, the car will fetch for you. Won’t even have to open your mouth and put the mojo on them. Well, except for instructions. The car speaks 4 u.
Men are better than cars. And cars… well, you know the rest.