Old Men Are Saviors, Cougars Are Gross
A manpiphany is a jolt of genius that starts at the balls and proceeds directly to the brain. Whenever I experience this phenomenon, I open my mouth and speak as quickly as I can. What comes out may offend loads of women, but fuck women. The truth needs to be spoken.
Female anger is the weather vane of truth.
Truth is the enemy of women.
If a woman ever gets pissed off at anything you say, science will prove you right.
Old guys hooking up with young women is fucking awesome.
See? If any women were allowed to read that, it would offend the shit out of them. That means it must be the truth.
Old guys hooking up with young women is awesome and every guy in the world hopes to do it one day — tomorrow preferably. During our twenties, men realize that all women our age stopped emotionally maturing long ago. Puberty for women should actually be called retirement — a retirement of emotional growth, a retirement of critical thinking, and a retirement of whatever makes women not behave like frigid cunts.
Men are better than women.
You don’t buy a new car with a bunch of fucking dings in it, do you? Dings don’t fix themselves. Cars don’t “grow out of” a bunch of dings. God I fucking hate dings.
Women’s egos are like trees. You can tell their age by counting the number of un-fixable fucking dings all over them. Dings like getting offered $300 for a blowjob by one of her boyfriend’s poker buddies because everyone was drunk and she can’t take a joke or a hint. Here comes the sobbing MySpace journal!
Here comes the science.
Old men who hook up with younger women are propelling our species into the next millennium in a big way — big like an ACME rocket. A new study brought to you by the letters M, E, N, says old men are dumping genes that make them live longer into the E-Z Bake oven that is a young woman every time they cross the May/December divide.
An E-Z Bake oven is a cheap and over-hyped toy that produces a consistent supply of shit.
Think about it like this. Biologically speaking, women expire somewhere around 50; even though we know their actual expiration date is 23. Biologically speaking, men can reproduce into their 70’s. In order to pass on that “long life” gene, these older men must sleep with younger women. And by “younger”, I mean women in their 20’s. Do the math, 70 minus 50 is 20. It makes sense.
Older men who hook up with young girls are also doing you and I a favor. Girls who would date older men have father issues that border on psychotic. They’ll key your car if you piss them off. They’ll stalk you. The last thing you want is a relationship with one of these broads without a good twenty years on her. You’ll never hear the end of it, and if she wasn’t too stupid to figure it out, she would do something really horrible like wreck your credit.
A long living man needs to pass on his long living genetic code to a woman before she turns 50. 50 is when menopause rains down on women like the glacier of hormones it is. And that’s exactly what the study found: something I already knew.
Here’s something else I already knew: cougars are gross.
Everything you think is right.
Related Articles:
October 12th, 2007 at 1:13 am - IP Man-Hash: eeb32e3dc6874
Clair you are the one who said when someone weaker than you assaults you, walk away and report them. By weaker that could be a weaker man or woman.
Sex came into it for two reasons. You did admit finally you thought a man should never hit a woman. The other being most of the time a woman will be weaker than a man.
You did give reasons when it was ok for someone stronger to strike back. But you gave only those reasons and said if the strike didn’t hurt you walk away. That means she hits you walk away. Screw that.
October 12th, 2007 at 1:14 am - IP Man-Hash: eeb32e3dc6874
By the way being struck by another person is a valid reason to strike them back.
October 12th, 2007 at 1:17 am - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
…No it’s not. Take the handicapped person scenario I set out for you. Do you still think it’s justified?
“That means she hits you walk away. Screw that.”
I hope that you’ve never hit a woman.
October 12th, 2007 at 1:26 am - IP Man-Hash: eeb32e3dc6874
The handicapped scenario was mentally retarded. You know what the hell the gist of the conversation is.
Know I don’t believe in hitting women. But you cannot expect two different sets of rules. If she strikes first and gets laid out, to bad. Self defense. Don’t you have something to be cooking?
October 12th, 2007 at 2:07 am - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
Okay, so you believe men shouldn’t hit women, but women should be house wives?
P.s - try not to make personal stabs at me…it really does nothing for you
October 12th, 2007 at 2:13 am - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
“If she strikes first and gets laid out, to bad. Self defense”
Hey I’m not saying, if she got a weapon just sit there, by all means punch the bitch and run, other then that though, you shouldn’t.
Self defense against a person that can barely hurt you, isn’t self defense. If a child comes up and hits you, “strikes first”, would it be acceptable for that child to get “laid out”?
October 12th, 2007 at 2:23 am - IP Man-Hash: eeb32e3dc6874
No I don’t think all women should be housewives. But you can’t have it both ways. You wan’t tradition when it suits you. A man can never hit you under any circumstances because it’s traditional. But you won’t stay at home and assume the traditional role. That’s selective feminism.
Why the extreme examples? No a woman shouldn’t have to have a weapon. You wan’t your sex to be able to assault and not be assaulted back because your weaker. Screw that.
October 12th, 2007 at 2:50 am - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
No, women shouldn’t hit men either, its just that i think that if they do, men should not hit back. And is it so much, if I want to work but not have men hit me, or rather be willing to hit me at the drop of pin? As far as traditional things go like opening doors for girls and stuff, I believe in that cause its real sweet, but i think girls should do it for guys to. I do.
I chose the extreme examples, because they best illustrate my point. There is an extreme power imbalance.
October 12th, 2007 at 3:11 am - IP Man-Hash: eeb32e3dc6874
Why because they are weaker? If men can’t then women should get into more trouble for assaulting men since they can’t protect themselves.
October 12th, 2007 at 3:21 am - IP Man-Hash: d4fbf993af398
Treating you like a “woman” at appropriate times to suit your cause isnt equality.
Romance is one sided, it isnt equality.
Chivalry isnt equality.
Who does all that shit? Men. Equality my ass. Equality when it suits you is not equality.
October 12th, 2007 at 4:29 am - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
…I said I think women should do it to. I actually do do that stuff.
October 12th, 2007 at 9:54 am - IP Man-Hash: 497a2bd14e918
Then she SHOULD have enough brains to NOT start a physical altercation with someone LARGER than her.
How stupid do women have to be!?
October 12th, 2007 at 11:11 am - IP Man-Hash: 6d2bcc78aa95d
Thanks for once again showing your stance on ‘equlity’. Just so you know, your wrong.
Nothing you said stands for equality. Everything you said says, “Treat women better than you treat yourselves”. Being weaker does not mean your free to pick fights with no consequences. No matter who your fighting.
The only thing I can think of that takes responsibility away from yourself, is mental retardation or autism. So, unless your willing to admit that most females are suffering from ’slight’ mental retardation, which I would be inclined to believe, then your argument has no merit.
Lastly, I think Clair is from another country, her fucking word structure is odd. Maybe a muslim looking for a better man.
October 12th, 2007 at 2:36 pm - IP Man-Hash: cfc16a8e6e502
Than maybe she shouldn’t be picking fights.
October 12th, 2007 at 6:03 pm - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
Then she SHOULD have enough brains to NOT start a physical altercation with someone LARGER than her.
How stupid do women have to be!?
Thats the strange thing about humans, or any animal for that manner. When adrenalin is released into the blood stream it’s for either a. RUN LIKE HELL or b. stand and fight. When one chooses the later, humans tend to lose all rational, and the more instinctive, primordial part of their brain, known as the R-Complex through the triune brain model, starts to take over, and the neo-cortex seems to lose control. Once the natural drug dies down, the neo-cortex begins to take over and all the “good” decisions made whilst in their previous state, begin to look rash and out right stupid.
We humans have been evolving for millions of years to become the brilliant specimens that we are today. According to most people here “men are better than women”, so this can only lead to one assumption. Males cognitive process is by far superior (which is odd because men and womens brains seem to have been hardwired with differing pro’s and cons, which then I guess one could say one is better than the other, based PURELY on individual taste) and they have more control over their primordial urges (which is odd seen as men commit the most rapes…). SO if men are truly better than woman they would not hit women, because they have a more evolved brain that enables them to make rational decisions that does not lead to physical violence against a potential mother of their species and make them seem as a potential danger to any potential spouse.
October 12th, 2007 at 7:34 pm - IP Man-Hash: eeb32e3dc6874
So you’ll finally admit MABTW. But this evidence is only to be used to keep men from striking women.
But this logic can’t be applied to anything else. Men have better control over urges. So shouldn’t we be the only leaders? Shouldn’t we be the only ones getting child custody?
October 12th, 2007 at 7:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
No you see, men and women have a different method when they have over whelming urges. Men, being the more physical creature, tend to lash out violently, whereas women, being the social creature manipulate the human psyche.
In order to have the best style of leadership, a combination of physical activism and mental strategies are required. This can be accomplished with only women or only men, but is best when both join forces.
As for the sole custody thing, it is important to not, that although we can group human characteristics, not everyone is the same and there fore can drastically differ from the mold,there fore the most fitting parent should be entitled custody.
October 12th, 2007 at 8:29 pm - IP Man-Hash: eeb32e3dc6874
Men tend to lash out violently. I see you never bothered to check out those domestic violence stats.
October 12th, 2007 at 8:58 pm - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
I’m assuming your from America, this is why you bring this up. As far as I’m aware, (correct me if I’m wrong), but women perpetrate most domestic violence acts. Correct? Anyway, even if this is the case in your country, your over looking the big picture; HUMANITY.
Look through the course of history. Women would manipulate men psychologically and as such get what they want, I think Cleopatra is a good example of this. Men got what they want through brute force; look at rape statistics (past and present), notice how the majority of war lords were men, notice how men are normally in charge of either side of people that are at war? Look at school yard fights. Boys are more likely to engage in one then a girl.
I’m not saying women can’t be physically aggressive, and I’m not saying a man can’t be socially aggressive. Suzy may be the most physically aggresive and dominant person ever, and Johny may be the most emotionally manipulative person ever. This just means they broke away from the mold. It still doesn’t change the fact that men tend to lash out violently more often than women, and women tend to be more mentally manipulative.
Oh I noticed thats the only part of the comment you responded to, so I’m going to assume that you agree on the rest. :)
October 12th, 2007 at 9:12 pm - IP Man-Hash: cfc16a8e6e502
Adrenaline doesn’t hold up in court.