Old Men Are Saviors, Cougars Are Gross
A manpiphany is a jolt of genius that starts at the balls and proceeds directly to the brain. Whenever I experience this phenomenon, I open my mouth and speak as quickly as I can. What comes out may offend loads of women, but fuck women. The truth needs to be spoken.
Female anger is the weather vane of truth.
Truth is the enemy of women.
If a woman ever gets pissed off at anything you say, science will prove you right.
Old guys hooking up with young women is fucking awesome.
See? If any women were allowed to read that, it would offend the shit out of them. That means it must be the truth.
Old guys hooking up with young women is awesome and every guy in the world hopes to do it one day — tomorrow preferably. During our twenties, men realize that all women our age stopped emotionally maturing long ago. Puberty for women should actually be called retirement — a retirement of emotional growth, a retirement of critical thinking, and a retirement of whatever makes women not behave like frigid cunts.
Men are better than women.
You don’t buy a new car with a bunch of fucking dings in it, do you? Dings don’t fix themselves. Cars don’t “grow out of” a bunch of dings. God I fucking hate dings.
Women’s egos are like trees. You can tell their age by counting the number of un-fixable fucking dings all over them. Dings like getting offered $300 for a blowjob by one of her boyfriend’s poker buddies because everyone was drunk and she can’t take a joke or a hint. Here comes the sobbing MySpace journal!
Here comes the science.
Old men who hook up with younger women are propelling our species into the next millennium in a big way — big like an ACME rocket. A new study brought to you by the letters M, E, N, says old men are dumping genes that make them live longer into the E-Z Bake oven that is a young woman every time they cross the May/December divide.
An E-Z Bake oven is a cheap and over-hyped toy that produces a consistent supply of shit.
Think about it like this. Biologically speaking, women expire somewhere around 50; even though we know their actual expiration date is 23. Biologically speaking, men can reproduce into their 70’s. In order to pass on that “long life” gene, these older men must sleep with younger women. And by “younger”, I mean women in their 20’s. Do the math, 70 minus 50 is 20. It makes sense.
Older men who hook up with young girls are also doing you and I a favor. Girls who would date older men have father issues that border on psychotic. They’ll key your car if you piss them off. They’ll stalk you. The last thing you want is a relationship with one of these broads without a good twenty years on her. You’ll never hear the end of it, and if she wasn’t too stupid to figure it out, she would do something really horrible like wreck your credit.
A long living man needs to pass on his long living genetic code to a woman before she turns 50. 50 is when menopause rains down on women like the glacier of hormones it is. And that’s exactly what the study found: something I already knew.
Here’s something else I already knew: cougars are gross.
Everything you think is right.
Related Articles:
October 11th, 2007 at 3:00 am - IP Man-Hash: eeb32e3dc6874
Clair what could he have done to have done to incited that behavior? Women seem to seek reasons to validate assaulting men. Like their just had to be something he did.
Maybe what Dakota meant was the numbers everyone has been led to believe regarding real assault, are small compared to the numbers femisnists throw out there.
If you go to the forums their is a link under one of the threads.
October 11th, 2007 at 3:27 am - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
Well first of all i didn’t say he did anything to deserve what he got. I don’t know the situation. But say, a man beated his woman, say he abused the kids. In my books people that do this, deserve everything bad that happens to them.
If thats what Dokota meant, Dokota would have said that.
October 11th, 2007 at 3:49 am - IP Man-Hash: 9604615ec560b
It was the policy of inbreeding and having too few numbers. Coupled that with the fact they didnt manage to keep up with the pace of modern warfare. But in all, kickass civilization.
You make 2 assertions.
1. We must be accurate in stating how many women are whores.
First off, this is Dick’s site and he has his ways of presenting the information/facts how he wants it. Myself, I see the ingenuity in his posts and how they often tie with the way women react. It has been a most eye opening experience.
2. We must interview and assess ALL women
I am sorry that we cant be arsed to do that. We rely on something called extrapolation and life experiences as Dakota so brilliantly pointed out. If you feel anger at being labelled along with women in that cute little box, maybe you should do some self reflection as to what YOUR gender has done. There is no smoke without fire and there are numerous men on this site and who support this site. It says something. Its now up to you what you want to believe and what you wish to do. Enough said.
October 11th, 2007 at 3:56 am - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
okay, with that argument, it’s just the same as supporting radical feminism. Hey their being bitches, but “There is no smoke without fire and there are numerous [women on the web and in the real world] and who support this. It says something” “maybe you should do some self reflection as to what YOUR gender has done”.
October 11th, 2007 at 4:14 am - IP Man-Hash: eeb32e3dc6874
Clair you women act like you abuse because the man hits mom or the kids. Like mom couldn’t have just done it because she got pissed for not getting her way.
I dont know the percentages. But as noted their is a link in the forums that provides the truth on DV. You women come here and want constant proof. You demand some guy provide you with all this evidence.
Like you can’t believe women do it as much. Chances are overwhelming most men here have never hit a woman. By the same token I can assure you that almost every man here has been struck by your gender.
October 11th, 2007 at 4:31 am - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
“Clair you women act like you abuse because the man hits mom or the kids. Like mom couldn’t have just done it because she got pissed for not getting her way.”
When a man hits a woman, it has a more severe psychological effect on children. Like it or not, IT DOES.
“I dont know the percentages. But as noted their is a link in the forums that provides the truth on DV [yeah, for one country? Try the world over]. You women come here and want constant proof [...sorry we don't take things at face value from people that have a blazing fire of hatred directed at us]. You demand some guy provide you with all this evidence [Not some "guy", someone that supports the statement].”
Like you can’t believe women do it as much. [I can believe that, I just doubt the general severity of it, I'm not saying there aren't serious cases, I'm just saying on a whole].”
“I can assure you that almost every man here has been struck by your gender.”
Oh, like I haven’t been hit by a man. Like I don’t know other women who haven’t.
“Chances are overwhelming most men here have never hit a woman.”
Please do enlighten me with this information and provide a link that proves it. Because, as a single person…I know loads of men that have hit females, imagine all the other women out there.
October 11th, 2007 at 8:48 am - IP Man-Hash: 261422b8e19b4
A good long term strategy Dick; and all of a sudden i don’t feel so sorry for those ancient porn stars with a new, just-turned-18 biatch whom is replaced then ext month by another… like stock rotation with genetic pros.
And on the by is thier a woman commenting bellow me? How simple-a-thing to ask… a place where there are…
“…no women allowed. If you are a woman, at this point I would like to…”[http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/about/]
Your oppinion is not appreciated here!
October 11th, 2007 at 8:54 am - IP Man-Hash: cfc16a8e6e502
Clair…
It would be idiotic to assume that ALL women are destructive demons.
It is also idiotic to assume…
- that all terrorists actually kill people.
- that all head on collisions are instantly fatal.
Although neither of those examples INSTANTLY result in the worst case scenario, they in themselves are still things that intelligent people seek to avoid. When dealing with women, one must weigh the risk/cost/benefit.
- Women ALWAYS cost a fuckload of money (diamonds, flowers, cars, marriage, dates, vacations). They also cost rediculous amounts of time and effort.
- The benefit to women is good, no doubt. But I hardly think having someone “always there” is anywhere near the cost. My dog costs me less than 50 dollars a month to maintain, and she is ALWAYS there. Moreso, she listens, comforts me, and never throws things at me once a month.
- The risk of dating women is unfathomable. I would be perfectly happy to expand on this, but I believe Dakota verbalized that perfectly well. +120 man points to him.
However, I do agree with you, Clair. It is rediculous to assume that every divorce defaults to the woman, and it is rediculous to assume that ALL women assault their husbands. just as it is rediculous to assume…
- No one ever wins the billion-dollar lottery.
- people never survive getting shot in the head.
Both scenarios are very possible. They are so improbable however, that they hit major news every time. I can’t even fathom why men winning in divorce court isn’t news worthy. Surely, it’s rarer than winning a billion dollars.
October 11th, 2007 at 10:28 am - IP Man-Hash: 6d2bcc78aa95d
Like I said before to Jenn or some bitch here who tried to defend Clair, here she is again saying that she knows how awful women can be, but since men do it, it is ok in her book.
So, since we have established that women are physically abusive, then it is ok for us to abuse them too. Right Clair.
October 11th, 2007 at 11:27 am - IP Man-Hash: 497a2bd14e918
What a hypocrit.
PROVE IT!
So you’re saying that anytime a man hits a woman, some child somewhere develops an adverse psychological condition? Riiiight! And women can hit men as hard as they can and it won’t hurt the man either, right?
Anyone says anything you don’t like, you immediately demand proof. Practice what you preach.
October 11th, 2007 at 6:12 pm - IP Man-Hash: eeb32e3dc6874
Funny comment about dad assaulting mom hurts the kids more then if they see her abuse him. When did this happen? No proof.
It doesn’t matter if it does or not. That doesn’t mean he deserves to get punished more for DV. It shoudn’t matter if his blows can cause more damage. That’s the feminists rallying cry. ” I can’t hit as hard so it’s not as bad.” Going under that criteria small men should get away with assaulting all other men.
You can believe women assault as much or more. But you doubt the severity of it. You have been brainwashed into what most DV against women is. It’s not some horribly beaten woman with black eyes and a broken jaw. It’s usually something much less severe. You know that.
You are the prime perpetrators of DV. No men don’t get light slaps and claim DV. You hit some guy and get knocked out..you deserved it. Don’t trivialize it. You really piss me off with your stories. I myself know two women who were victims. One horribly abused. So don’t tell me some fucking story about how one of your ho friends had a bad day, and got hit for smacking her boyfriend.
October 11th, 2007 at 10:53 pm - IP Man-Hash: cfc16a8e6e502
When a female decides to get physical, she relinquishes her rights as a woman. She wants to take pot-shots because she was “just so angry!”, knock her retarded ass to the ground, and make it last.
I don’t condone assault. I commend retaliation.
October 11th, 2007 at 11:12 pm - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
What if she was substantially weaker then you?
October 11th, 2007 at 11:17 pm - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
You have no idea.
October 12th, 2007 at 12:08 am - IP Man-Hash: eeb32e3dc6874
Being substantially weaker means nothing. Would you tell a man who got punched in the face by a 90 pound weakling to go easy on him?
Since I’m older than you and have a lot more experience, I can say I do have an idea.
October 12th, 2007 at 12:16 am - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
No you don’t. You don’t know how old I am, and you don’t know what I’ve seen.
As for the first part, yes I would. If a person disabled person in a wheelchair started ramming you with their chair because they were angry with you, would you king hit them in face?
If one can not civilized enough to restrain their primordial urges to engage in physical combat, then AT LEAST, maintain enough dignity NOT to fight someone who is weaker then you.
October 12th, 2007 at 12:29 am - IP Man-Hash: eeb32e3dc6874
I like the last part. Like the extreme example to. Your like the rest. Being weaker does not give you the right to assault.
As a man if another man is going to strike me he is getting struck back. Regardless of his size. You could have clarified your point earlier. All you had to say was you believed women were weaker so men shouldn’t strike them back in retaliation.
If we live in Clair world all 90 pound weaklings can strike larger people without fear of getting their ass kicked. Women could strike men and not fear their pie hole being slugged closed. We tried to tell you feminism was all about being treated special.
October 12th, 2007 at 12:39 am - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
“Being weaker does not give you the right to assault.”
No it doesn’t. If someone weaker then you assaults you, walk away and report them. Unless of course they’ve done something really wrong like I dunno, hurt someone you loved, raped someone, umm I dunno, anything really bad. But if all they’ve done is hit you, and it doesn’t faze you, then walk away, and report them.
“All you had to say was you believed women were weaker so men shouldn’t strike them back in retaliation.”
I actually do believe that to an extent. I know that their are women who are stronger then men and men that are weaker then women, but on average, this isn’t so.
“If we live in Clair world all 90 pound weaklings can strike larger people without fear of getting their ass kicked. Women could strike men and not fear their pie hole being slugged closed.”
Nope. If we lived in Clair World, no one would have any reason to hit each other, with the exception of play fighting and contact sports.
October 12th, 2007 at 12:54 am - IP Man-Hash: eeb32e3dc6874
Sorry if you strike someone you should deal with what they have to deal out. Nice world. I can get pissed at someone larger and punch them knowing they can’t hit me back.
Have you read one report on DV? Many times when men do report it their the ones arrested. Many times the cops do nothing when he reports it. So essentially most of the time nothing is done to her.
You saying men should just walk away and report her because she’s weaker is ridiculous. Wouldn’t that be like me saying your a woman so you should stay in the home? Same thing. It’s a societal expectation of each sex.
Men are taught not to hit women under any circumstances. Women are taught traditionally they should stay home and cook and clean. So since you wan’t one bargain to be upheld, uphold the other. Start your cleaning.
October 12th, 2007 at 1:06 am - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
mike5150, PEOPLE that are stronger then other PEOPLE, should not hit those PEOPLE, unless their is a valid reason like one of the ones I mentioned earlier. Why does everything come down to sex with you?