@Harry,

I think your right that my comments would be better placed among other females… eventually. However, I also feel this site as harsh as it is against females, is a good test for my intent and commitment as well as a good sounding board

given an acceptance on the mens part to allow me to continue commenting here…

(thinks my computer has a mind of its own today)

It’s not all harsh, most you see here are mere observations

IOW.. i will leave if you all wish me to. .. bottom line… thats all for now as my pc continues to comment for me

sidonia, as far as I am concerned, you should be free to post here occasionally. I think that a sympathetic(ish) woman poster could be of benefit to this site.

But that is my opinion only, I do not run this site nor can I speak for any other.

Besides, I think it would annoy ‘usemenonly’ and that can only be a good thing.

Lmao, good point.

sidonia: Just remember if you stay, you’re going to hear some straight talking, mens opinions on women.

Thank you Watcher…

sidonia

So basically, your entire conclusion is that because women don’t pay child support that they’re useless? Sorry, but you cannot blame women for laws that were written by men. Especially considering these laws were written with the specific male notion that women should be the mothers and raise the children. So in essence, you’re blaming women for mens mistakes. Besides, child support is a good rule. As long as you take a DNA test when in doubt! Alimony is what you should have an issue with. And if alimony does become an issue. Stop paying it. She has a job, she has her own money. If you really want to prove that your better at managing money than a woman, don’t pay alimony. If she comes knocking then you’re right and I’m wrong. But if she manages her own expenses without you’re help… then how do you support your statement that menarebetterthanwomen.com?

“So basically…..”

“So in essence…..”

Wrong. This shit is not open for your interpretation.

And I have don’t have an “issue” with vaginamony because no woman HAS ever – nor WILL she will ever get my money.

A man can have an “issue” with the smell of DOG SHIT too…. but that doesn’t mean there is anything wrong with HIM.

You are hereby sentenced to 101 hours of listening to Tom Leykis.

And http://nomarriage.com is proof that we are not “blaming women” for men’s mistakes. That’s how men AVOID mistakes.

menarebetterthanwomen.

I never claimed there is anything wrong with you! You are of course entitles to your own opinion. I was merely stating that your assumptions are unfounded. But for the sake of argument let’s say that men are indeed better than women at everything. If so, then poverty, war, politics, religion, jobs, which were all invented by men, would actually be considered good things! They were invented during a time when women did not have rights. They were shitty back then, they are still shitty now, men and their phallic shaped missiles and bullets still destroy the world and you guys are all here congratulating yourselves for doing the same shit, albeit with different tools, for the better part of 100,000 years. And when in 20th century women finally get their rights and begin doing the same shit as men, you actually blame them for it. Where is the logic in that?
A REAL MAN once said: “As long as there are MEN, there will be war!” Than man was Albert Einstein.

All this may give you the idea that I think women are better than men. I don’t! I think both men and women are equally as Stupid and Ignorant as a doorknob. Through my experiences I can only say that everyone is considered a dumbshit until proven otherwise. Ranting about female flaws while ignoring your own male flaws and personality flaws (since not all your flaws are gender specific) is not the way to prove yourself otherwise. To quote another great man: “Men are from Earth. Women are from Earth. Deal with it!” That’s George Carlin in case your interested. A true man’s man!!!

iab: All of those things are mens gift to you. Without men women wouldn’t even have gotten past the stone age, if they’d even have managed that. Flint knapping takes skills women can’t even develope. War is inevitable given the type of animal the human is. A woman in power does not equal no war. That’s a fact.

Congratulations IAB you have been successfully brainwashed.

• They were invented during a time when women did not have rights.

Women have MORE RIGHTS THAN MEN NOW. And NOW what is their fucking excuse for being lazy, greedy, badly behaved , selfish, greedy fat cows??????

Women have ALWAYS the right to PULL THEMSELVES TOGETHER and they have the right fuck off when they are unwanted.

Why are women not INTERESTED in that?? Why are women today STILL expecting a man to support their children – even when they LIE about who the father is??

Snap out of it.

And shut the fuck up blaming every man

For every man who started a war, there are MILLIONS who faught and died for YOUR freedoms , liberties and way of life which YOU take for granted every single day of your existence.

Wouldn’t you be shocked to learn that WOMEN ARE SOLE INTIATIORS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, DISPUTE and DIVORCE IN EVERY HOME IN AMERICA?????

And YOU pretend women don’t start wars??

Women initiate wars in every home, marriage and relationship in America.

Just observe their behavior on this website. You’d think they were BEGGING for gang-anal and LIVE to get the living shit kicked out of them.

Menarebetterthanwomen.

Its important to clarify that I left out…..

“72% OF THE TIME”….. women are the SOLE initiators of domestic violence, disputes and divorce.

Just listen to Tom Leykis on domestic violence.

Women are SICK in the fucking head.

Chris put it better than I, been a long day. Nice response Chris.

Chrissy, shit, you are such a liar. No wonder you can’t make it in life, you ugly piece of shit.

Go waste your child-raping daddy, fuck, and then waste yourself. Nobody with a brain likes you, you worthless failure. :)

Thank you sweety, for making the point.

Just listen to these cunts.

Unbelievable.

http://www.abanet.org/domviol/statistics.html
And I quote:

Approximately 1.3 million women and 835,000 men are physically assaulted by an intimate partner annually in the United States.

Intimate partner violence made up 20% of all nonfatal violent crime experienced by women in 2001.

Intimate partners committed 3% of the nonfatal violence against men.

20% women vs 3% men? And with 1 man to every 1.3 women in the US alone, this would suggest that the minority is a lot more violent that the majority.

And the whole human nature theory is complete BS. The point of civilization is to overcome your animalistic tendencies for war and destruction, not to embrace them. Herein lies the problem Chris.

Truth be told, all you guys here talk a lot but when push comes to shove if a woman throws herself at you, you will fuck her, no questions asked. So it’s fine to fuck a woman when you need to, but actually treating her as a person is wrong? There’s a word for that; it’s called gender racism! What is this women have no rights BS?

When your fantasizing about the power you want to have over the female species and jacking off later, think of this: Wolves and penguins mate for life! If animals can accept that, why can’t you people?

What can I say? You’re a moron.

They do say “A little knowledge is dangerous”, in your case it really is a matter of ‘a little knowledge’.

You know, I could point out all the factual inaccuracies and flaws in your logic but what’s the point?

Stupid is.

I actually concidered pointing out the obvious too but as Watcher says, whats the point.

Don’t call stupid on issues without first actually proving it first. If you have something to point out then please do so. A little knowledge is dangerous I agree. My case is not “a little knowledge”; it’s dealing with people with little knowledge. Now please sir if you have something to add to the conversation to make a real point then do so. Perhaps I’ll find a way to disprove your points also. But if you decide not to continue with this discussion then I will kindly ask you to do what you want women to do: “Shut up!” Trying to avoid the convo simply by attacking me personally with profanities will never win you the conversation. It simply shows your ignorance even more.

So you want me to prove you’re stupid?
Okay, now where to begin…

“And the whole human nature theory is complete BS.” [I don't know where to start with this one]

“Don’t call stupid on issues” [What?]

“What is this women have no rights BS?” [Who said women have no rights?]

“if a woman throws herself at you, you will fuck her, no questions asked” [Scientific study was it?]

“Perhaps I’ll find a way to disprove your points also. [also what?]”

“There’s a word for that; it’s called gender racism!”
[gender racism? That's just totally teapot paper-clip!]

One can only conclude that either you are a rather smart chimp with an internet connection or an incredibly stupid human.

I hope you’re a chimp.

I like chimps.

It’s the female chimp; the kind that would expect the male members of the troop to fight-off (read: warring behavior) mating rivals, or simply a passing stab at a banana by one of ‘em.

One has to wonder how anyone can DENY that men are REQUIRED (as Chris has brought up so many times) to be BETTER than whimmin, when whimmin have X forms of birth control available, can legally LIE about being on it, subsequently give the man NO input regarding a birth/abortion, stick him with the bill, and not only passively accept such injustice, but have the nerve to EQUATE a few kowtowing men (legislators) with men’s right to be irate about it, on the whole.

So, we CAN logically and fairly blame whimmin, as only a FEW men wrote and passed these laws, while MILLIONS of whimmin take advantage of them (are whimmin this stupid; or just this FULL of injustice?!)

Additionally, men are cuckolded, and subsequently ordered to pay, EVEN for these (thanks to the feminist sense of fairness, whimmin in general’s lack of sense of justice, and again, a few kowtowing legislators).

Relatedly, whimmin’s ability to earn their own money has only infrequently stopped the courts from awarding them vaginamony (”Mrs. I.A. Bitch will receive the monies to support the lifestyle to which she has become accustomed…gavel strike” – never mind that if whimmin had ANY sense of actual fairness, THEY would be paying HIM back for the expense of the mortgage, utilities, upkeep, food, and the car he bought her, etc. – again, staying home, not having a career… and having children, IS 100% HER PREROGATIVE…there should be NO compensation for such BEYOND the choice itself, EXCEPT for HALF of what’s ACTUALLY required to support the children month-to-month, when she leaves).

The fact that certain things were invented at a time when whimmin had “no rights” in no way logically suggests (by simple extrapolation) that whimmin could or would have invented such things anyway (again, even with AT LEAST equal rights, MALE ingenuity greatly outpaces that of the female – it’s NOT even close).
Furthurmore, POVERTY is an inescapable conclusion for some in ANY economic system, “formalized” or not (some people have no or little motivation; others are congenitally less able, etc. – MEN didn’t INVENT poverty, sweetheart).
And WAR is in the hearts of humans, not men alone (female leaders have ordered MEN into battle).
POLITICS is merely the art of persuasion, or negotiation (it’s formalizing into institutions is largely men’s doing; but would you prefer global anarchy, more or less).
RELIGION – mystical, mostly unprovable beliefs in the hopes of something greater, more powerful and benevolent than oneself, isn’t, per se, an INVENTION of MEN; but rather exists as part of the human condition, quite possibly within the collective unconscious, as archetypes (regardless of MEN’s formalizing of such institutions, similar beliefs would be present, and every rule and biological tendency has it’s exceptions – atheists, in this example).
JOBS – what! You’re going to complain because you haven’t been (legally) awarded ENOUGH opportunity in the companies men created; even though you’ve had ample opportunity to design your own?! (you call all these things shitty; even with AMPLE opportunity to create your own, or sit it out – “brilliant”).

Regarding domestic violence, just some problems with the statistics include the following:
*A synthesis of police/whimmin’s shelter data shows that men are more likely to commit domestic violence (well of course it does; they’re interviewing whimmin at the shelter, and before that, WHAT do you think the cops encountered?! They found a sniveling, black-eyed little bitch who thought that she could HIT a man, and get away with it. So, off HE goes to JAIL, with his name on the report as perpetrator, ESPECIALLY in pro-arrest states, and ESPECIALLY because the cops are looking for any damning…REAL, evidence…no, this isn’t true every time…but enough).
*Additionally, regarding how whimmin get away with manipulation and lies, is their desire to get him out of the house (for whatever reasons), or gain sole custody of the children by establishing him as an “abuser.”
(Contrarwise, a synthesis of multiple random studies has shown that whimmin are at least as likely to initiate domestic violence as men).

IfItWasn’tFor”SexualHarassment”-
Youc.u.n.t.sWouldNeverGetLaid

Excellent post as usual. Do I take it that you are a admirer of Carl Jung?

Benign: Respect mate. Good post.

Benign: They wouldn’t prefer anarchy, guess how much ‘equality’ they’d get then. Natural order would ensue.

Watcher – while I’m no psychologist, I think the concept of archetypes is one which whimmin often neglect in their analyses of men and whimmin (I think that there is something to archetypes, whether as God-implanted constructs, or as products of an intergenerational “collective unconscious,” as Jung describes, which are symbols of human thinking, fears, and even experience, that whimmin would subsequently take advantage of, if only they were MORE ABLE TO – so instead, it’s convenient and easy for them to blame men for the impetus of their instincts, in some part, driven by not only a desire to survive and thrive in general, but by a desire to create, and yes, destroy or kill when necessary to defend resources or the group (in other words, as others have pointed out on this site and elsewhere, while men may be destructive – acting in part on “archetypical drives,” if you will – it’s also MEN who have been the MOST creative…PROACTIVE…
(at WHAT stage of development would whimmin be at if not for us, is really the question I pose…and based on their RELATIVE creativity thus far, I’m going with Camille Paglia’s analysis).

So, I DON’T claim to understand archetypes, or even the concept, all that well; but if whimmin were able to shut down our “killer instincts,” they’d also shut down our drive, creativity…yes, our urgings to even survive, as well.

Harry – as usual, you PROVE you are far more intelligent than you give yourself credit for.

AreWhimminBetterThanStrawHuts?

Benign: Never doubted I have a certain amount of intelligence, just know I lack the ‘paperwork’ that says I have it. What’s Camille Paglia’s analysis btw? Or could you post a link, save me trudging through pages of (likely to be boring) the internet.

@Watcher: I will refrain from responding in any way since you do not appear interested in having a true conversation. You deliberately take things out of context and even when you do, you still cannot provide an adequate response.

@benign: Interesting how you take Camille Paglia’s analysis to make your point. What is especially interesting is that by doing so you are simply proving my point: You are afraid of women! You are living in an age where men are the weaker sex, maybe not physically weaker, and it scares you.

This is the central issue. Men have been creating and destroying as you say for thousands of years. You ask about female creativity insofar. Camille Paglia clearly states she believes the entire reason for creativity and destruction comes from our (YES I’M A MAN SWEETHEART!) inherent desire for control.

It is not male hatred of women but male fear of women that is the great universal.

And as such, the 20th and 21st century brought the feminist movement (which I do disagree with on many issues) and you cannot deny that they gained certain rights to act like men. Be it that they already had emotional control over our species and with the addition of male rights now you fear that you will become extinct.

What you fail to realise is that instead of being afraid that men are the WEAKER sex you should acknowledge the fact that without women you would actually be extinct.

Misogynists fear of women can be expertly seen by the simple statement “All women are whores!”. No they are not! Women are more sexually liberal nowadays and have the option to choose the man they want, even for a one night stand. When men do it they’re studs, when women do it they’re sluts! Why?

While there is no denying that men have built or created or invented far more it is not a basis for stating that men are better. It simply proves the thousand year old historical fact that men fear women and kept them submissive so as to stay in power. That argument actually works against you. Besides, having created more does not automatically make you more. There are a number of women who have invented or created or built. From art to stem cell research, women have done a lot. And this is only in the last 100 or so years. Men have had the better part of 100,000 years of evolution, farming, society, religion etc to learn stuff. Most 21st century women have caught up on this in a mere 100 years. That is not to say that men have not accomplished much in 100,000 years. They have of course, it’s just odd that women, having studied all these, have actually adapted and built on these inventions within 100 years.

Also, on the issue of religion (a purely mad-made theory) which was created to explain phenomena that men feared and needed an explanation for. And especially in the three main religions in our world today, the male fear of women and the desire to control them can easily be seen be it Adam and Eve, be it the reasoning behind multiple wives in Muslim religion etc. Now if we had focused more on real logical reasoning instead of just giving in to our primal instincts (except sex of course which should be primal!) and fear maybe the world wouldn’t be the shithole it is today.

Finally, I will once again say as I have said countless times before; that women are not to blame for the fact that law in biased toward women. Blame the feminists, blame the politicians, the parliament whatever. There are many culprits but the entire female species is a little much.

IAB, it would take more time and effort than I am prepared to spend in explaining and exploring the reasons why your opinions are so ‘off the mark’.

Still I will teach you two points for free.

1. Most women fear men, very few men fear women.
2. Most men seek to control their wives for their own good (emotional creatures do not make rational decisions) and because they feel deeply the burden of responsibility for their households.

It’s sad to say but your reasoning is shallow and your understanding ‘child like’. I suggest that instead of typing drivel you spend your time reading and reflecting.

Women will be only ever be the equal of men when they become men.

Look friend…I have nothing against you. You are of course entitled to your beliefs, even if for some reason you don’t actually care to discuss your reasoning behind them. However, you shouldn’t tell others they are ‘off the mark’ or ‘child like’ without actually explaining why. It’s one thing to adhere to your beliefs and it’s another to dismiss everyone elses.

The notion of my reading and/or reflecting, or lack there of, are my business and you are in no position to tell me how to go about living or studying. Should you feel compelled to address in a calm and rational manner why you believe that you deserve better than a woman, I would be more than happy to discuss it.

About your two free points that you were so happy to teach me, again without any valid points explained.

1. Most men fear women, very few women fear men (usually wife beaters, psychopaths, sociopaths etc).
Man’s fear has always led them to do irrational things. As explained above, such is the need for religion. To explain phenomena that cannot be identified and as such are feared. The problem here is with denying that fear simply to satisfy your ego and remain the alpha male.

2. Emotional creatures do not make rational decisions I agree! See above about the irrationality of men. That being said, most men do not seek to control their wives even if they wanted to. Problem here is again with the ego, because not being able to control your wife makes you again fear for your manhood. You can control your girlfriend no problem, the woman who marries you however will always be in control. You can’t do anything to stop that (that is nothing that won’t get you thrown into prison).

Also, refrain from talking AT me using absolute statements if you please; I am not a child and that shit didn’t work even when I was a child. It simply irritates me.

Your final statement is absolute racism so I won’t even bother to discuss it.

What I do however find very funny is that I have shown this site to 4 of the most intelligent women I know (and I know plenty of them, hence why I disagree with most of what is on this site) and they actually laughed, shrugged it off and never bothered even responding to you people. I find that very admirable considering a male, much like myself, is still typing just to satisfy my ego.

iab: Men fear women? I think you’re mixing with the wrong men. If you met me I could prove in seconds I fear no women and as yet very few men. I’m not trying to prove some macho alpha male point, merely stating fact. If you choose to ignore this, it’s your choice, not a fact that men fear women. What I do have concerns about, is the future for our way of life. What women and many men seem to forget, times for now are reasonably safe and simple. One of the reasons women have been able to gain the advantages they now enjoy. Are things going to remain this way? Very unlikely, you seem to be reasonably intelligent so I’m sure you could think of some ways things might change but I’ll put an obvious one forward. The oil will eventually run out, what do you think will happen when it starts to get more difficult to retrieve and so become more expensive? Things are going to get tougher, if you’re in your 30-40’s or less, possibly in your lifetime. Lets hope men still have enough masculinity left to step up to the plate when needs must.

Harry,

I completely agree with what you say about the future. It will get worse! But that’s not an issue of male and female equality. It’s an issue of natural selection. The meek will die and the strong will survive. This will affect both sexes.

Men FEAR women??

What moron said THAT?? That’s the funniest thing I have heard since breakfast.

You know there is a VERY clear difference between COURAGE and STUPIDITY

It doesn’t require “courage” to marry a woman…. it requires STUPIDITY.

The only risk worth taking –>> is a CALCULATED risk.
One weighs the costs and benefits of these risks.

As it is, many men are finding out that women FAIL a cost/benefit analysis in marriages and relationships.

That’s not “FEAR”.

Not even CLOSE.

Menarebetterthanwomen.

IAB: All I’ve ever asked for is for women to stop telling me they’re equal and show me, maybe you’re one of the few who could earn my respect (surely there has to be some) I’ll keep an eye out for some more of your posts, for now I have to get busy again. Hungry.

Okay I will be brutally honest with you.

This subject is very, very complex. To truly understand it and have a considered and educated opinion requires the following:

An immense amount of research from various different sources. This to begin with is incredibly difficult as there is so much deliberate misinformation and subjective opinion masquerading as social study.

Next you need the ability to rise above your own preconceptions and social dogma, this is a very difficult thing to do, not many can.

You need at least a fundamental understanding of psychology, anthropology, sociology, neurology and social history.

You need a mind analytical and perceptive enough to be able to draw together data from these various different sources and form a rational, cohesive model.

Do you posses these qualities and abilities?

No.

By your own admission you are stubborn and your posts indicate that you neither think deeply nor do you really understand those things you profess to believe in. Wife beaters, psychopaths, sociopaths fear women! That’s just plain Idiotic!

You don’t even know what the word ‘racism’ means!

As for your knowing plenty of intelligent women, I don’t doubt it. Intelligence is comparative and, as you are not very intelligent, you will undoubtedly know many ‘intelligent’ men and women. As they say, “In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is King” or in your case perhaps the “one eyed woman”?

Look, I’m sure you’re a good person and you certainly have every right to hold an opinion on any subject but your opinion currently is an ignorant and puerile one.

Educate yourself, formulate an erudite opinion and I will happily invite you over to dinner to discuss this subject at length. Until that time your posts are just the ramblings of an uneducated mind. Interesting but without significance.

Obviously SOME women are Intelligent….. and some are not.

But when a woman uses the word “INTELLIGENT”,
she should be VERY careful there.

Most women who THINK they are “intelligent” –>> don’t even know the difference between THOUGHTS, OPINIONS and ACTIONS.

Even a self-proclaimed “intelligent” woman will think ignoring her….. is worse than “treating her badly”.

A self-proclaimed “intelligent” woman will have a problem with what you THINK, and REACT as if you treated her badly.

Not so intelligent after all.

Wife beaters, psychopaths, sociopaths fear women! That’s just plain Idiotic!

Agreed. It’s firmly my belief that most females that are beaten could easily have avoided it, I did say most. Doesn’t excuse the fact that the male would be better off walking. I also believe, women really do need to realise how far they push men sometimes, deliberately or not. A saying I use myself occasionally, it can often be more intelligent to say nothing.

The important thing to remember is they treat men ho hit women as CRIMINALS… and they treat the women who RETURN to these abusers as though they are not totally fucked up in the head.

As if the women are “victims”.
WHEN THEY ARE NOT.

If you GO BACK and STAY in any abusive relationship, communication or situation … you are SICK and you NEED HELP.

THESE WOMEN ARE AS SICK AS THEIR ATTACKERS. And they should be committed to getting treatment and not be set free to GO BACK FOR MORE.

Don’t pamper them. Don’t feel sorry for them. If this bitch is going back for more….. point and LAUGH at her.

Doesn’t matter HOW crazy women will try to make a man….

You can do INFINITELY more permanent, internal damage to a woman…. by not hitting her at all, and ignoring her completely.

Re. My previous post.

I meant to say, “one eyed Queen” rather than “one eyed woman”

Although I can’t explain it, I’m sure that it was in some way a woman’s fault that I made the mistake!

Perhaps stupid is infectious? I hope I’m not coming down with a case of feminitus!

FUCK!!! I thought IAB was a male!!!! Well, at least possibly a male chimp but after carefully reading ‘his’ posts I’m not so sure…

“men fear women”? – I find it hard to believe that any man would think that true.

‘He’ knows MANY intelligent women? – Knowing ONE is quite uncommon.

‘He’ showed the site to “4 of the most intelligent women I know”. – Could you ever imagine a MAN doing that? Why?

Poor logical construction.

Catachresis.

Prone to emotional outbursts.

Something smells fishy here…

I read iab as female anyway. Too much of a closed mind to be anything else.

But prepared to be proved wrong if I am, and will take it like a man and not have a hissy fit ;)

Hahahahahahahahahaha!!! You ARE bitter…I knew it!! Am I right, is it because your dick is tiny??? Men like you can’t please women. That’s why you hate us!!! So, just how tiny is it? Is it at least a big as a Vienna Sausage? Probably not…

What kind of fucked up cunt thinks its a man’s role in life to please women?

Are you insane?

I don’t hate you sweety. We would never throw our cocks into something we “hate”.

To what “cock” are you referring? That tiny little thing dangling between your legs? Sorry, not interested…

Yes!

That very same tiny little cock you are begging for and can’t stay away from.

NOTE TO MEN: Penis size has nothing to do with getting women to obsess over you and go out of her way to BEG for your attention, even she knows she is not welcome or invited.

ALL women are this predictable.

Hahahahahahahahaha!!! I’d have to find it first!!! Hahahahahahahaha!!! Note to men…penis size is EVERYTHING!!! The only men who thinks that penis size doesn’t mater are men with little dicks!! Chris=Mr. Empty-pants: http://www.maleenhancement.org/

Size doesn’t matter to women are you fucking INSANE?

Are you gonna gonna drop to your knees and start SUCKING if you knew he had a donkey cock??

No, but you hookers would drop everything to go SHOPPING if he told you he had a “very high limit” on his credit card.

This is how we all know size doesn’t matter to women.

Shit, the way these women carried on… you’d think they think men exist to please THEM and not the other way around.

If size mattered, we would never see women make out with each other.

At this point, I’m really not surprised that a male takes an anecdote so seriously. And posts it as “proof.”

At least BOB knows what an anecdote is, although he is too arrogant to understand when one of the lesser sexes is being sarcastic.

I understood perfectly, I also know that sarcasm doesn’t become a woman as they rarely use it appropriately.

Fyi, she is using it appropriately.

Hmm…this is a difficult one as we don’t have a term for manginas(there’s very few of em around)

I think the best translation would be ‘Bhosra randa’(pussified male prostitute.)

That’ll suffice. Thank you for your manslation.

Watch how you speak to women, you filthy, ugly JEW.

You don’t even rate as human, you piece of shit. Go do what you filthy Jews are best at, blowing up innocent children or sucking off the U.S. government.

Drop dead, you diseased shit.

Why would a man have to “watch how he speaks to women??”

Are you insane??

FACT: THERE IS ZERO CONSIQUENCE IN SAYING WHATEVER YOU WANT TO A WOMAN’S FACE.

Zero.

You arrogant, stinking snatch.

Menarebetterthanwomen.