The Sisterhood of Dumbness
Women have to work extra hard to succeed at anything.
Myth! In actuality, women simply have to show up to be successful. Take swimsuit models. That’s about the most important and meaningful job a woman can ever hope to have or aspire to. Swimsuit models don’t have to fucking do anything but show up and let a man take their pictures.
That’s the real work in modeling of course: the picture taking. The way you can tell is by looking at all the jobs in a photography session and seeing which ones men do. This rule can be applied universally.
For God’s sake, have you seen what some of those models look like when they roll out of bed? Only exactly the same as every other woman in the world. Of course it would take a man to turn that into an object of fine art — or other type of art.
My point, however, is that women barely have to work at all in order to be successful. Think about it.
Women don’t have to learn anything or be prepared for an interview because in most countries, laws force employers to hire them. And if they don’t, all hiring is done by men anyway. Men are smart creatures, you see, and they know that hiring a woman will increase the chances of fucking said woman. That’s called survival of the species. Men are team players like that. Women, on the other hand, would be content to let the entire race die off just to take their precious sense of entitlement to the grave.
Women also don’t have to know how to do anything at work in order to not be fired, as there will always be some man around to fill in her gaps of competence in order to — all together now — increase his chances of fucking her.
The bullshit here is that this is seen as a bad thing. It’s biology folks. It’s as positive as recycling and soy milk — both of which I hate as a man. The biology in play here says two things:
1. Men are predisposed to the betterment of all human beings — including the desire to deepen the gene pool.
2. Women are lazy.
There’s a reason you’ve never told a woman she’s done a ‘half-assed job’ at anything. It’s because when it comes to women, if they even showed up they’ve used their whole ass. There’s a double entendre there that while very clever is much more so when left to your own imangination.
If anything, this is just one example of “Girl Power” actually working to benefit women. By the time a slightly competent woman works her way into a career. And I don’t know how she ended up even slightly competent. Let’s suspend our man-belief for the moment. Perhaps she was just ugly. By the time this uggo is in a career position, so many women have colossally fucked up before her, she’s a shoe-in for upper management.
Women who are even slightly competent are like professional athletes in the Special Olympics.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 3 [2] 1 » Show All
I think you are seeing something that is not present, Thaydule, or possibly projecting. Very few, if any, people on this site hate women.
-wolfe
The people on this website are fighting a battle that can never be fully won on either side. There will always be people who hate the opposite sex. But this fued is meaningless. Those who hate females, or males, are unfairly basing their view of them on a few bad expierences. Don’t let those expierences ruin any hope you have for happiness.
Hello
Hey Dakota. Great to see you. Glad you’re still out there. Now if only Alan would post…
Big Al pretty much said it. And I agree with Dakota on the merits of personal safety for the woman in question. I’ll give a slightly different perspective — from that of the guy doing the hiring.
When I first co-founded a company I was pretty green and naive. We were all in our mid 20’s, and I genuinely believed in giving women a slightly better chance than men. Our company was highly technical in nature, doing (for the time) some fairly advanced R&D. Qualified female candidates for jobs were a tiny minority. We had only 2-3 competitors globally, and we were 6-12 months ahead, which was amazing.
We had a race and gender neutral interview process, but it could always be shaded slightly (5% or so), so that if a “very very nearly as strong” female candidate applied, she’d often get the job. Make no mistake: I wasn’t an idiot, just naive. A woman who genuinely rated a 3.0/4 wouldn’t beat a man who rated a 3.2, but she might beat a man who rated a 3.1, and she would beat a man who rated 3.0.
Did I learn fast.
Essentially, hire a woman, and you’ve got to ensure without fail that there is a man who can do her job and he’s nearby, ready to take over. It isn’t just babies, it’s all kinds of crap.
A hungry guy is looking to work very hard and wave a big sword at the competition. A hungry woman is looking for a meal-ticket.
Older and wiser,
-wolfe
Sinecures for relatives is called “nepotism”, Dakota.
Sinecures for women is called “affirmative action”.
Nepotism is bad and leads to lack of competitiveness and corruption. Unless you’re a woman.
Affirmative action is good and leads to empowerment. Unless you’re a man.
Get used to it.
-Big Al
Here’s a good workplace story for you, guys (and sorry for not posting in a while — I’ve been busy and am getting busier for reasons which will become apparent):
Yesterday, one of my coworkers was taken out for a drug test and then suspended. He’s going to be let go today. He’s a well-known alcoholic who had apparently come to work smelling of alcohol once too often.
The head of HR is a woman. Because we employ a lot of union people and because she’s involved in terminations on a daily basis, she’s gotten the nickname “the hatchet.”
She immediately turned the whole business of my coworker over to her assistant, a man. The reason? She didn’t want to get into a potentially violent situation with a drunk man.
Now, on the level of personal safety, I applaud her discretion. I honestly wouldn’t want her to do the dirty work in this situation because she’s right: the guy might have burst into a drunken rage and hurt her.
However, does anyone think it’s an accident that her male assistant just happens to be an ex-cop? And if the head of HR weren’t female, I wonder if she’d need an assistant at all? How much is my company spending in order to employee two people when one might suffice if she weren’t female?
Good one Dick, good one…
You just another imposter and a fake. Beat it.
Effing pot Says:
April 27th, 2006 at 3:13 am- IP Man-Hash:
My point still stands that if the sex was crap for Dick it was obviously crap for her too.
Gent Says:
April 27th, 2006 at 1:37 pm- IP Man-Hash:
Who wants to pay the same money to a woman when none of them can perform even simple tasks like un-jamming a photocopier or printer, something any man can do half-asleep.
Once again cause and effect is lost on them. Either that or they don’t want to get toner on their immaculate little hands and make their shiny diamond rings all mucky. O Horror of horrors.
Women are a liability at the best of times. They should keep their fucking mouths shut and stick to making the tea like they used to.
You could have simply said, “like most women, I’m not happy unless I have the last word.”
Or the preferred abbreviation: “I’m a bitch.”
-Dick
Okay. Since Dick does not understand a simple message, lets do a little grammar lesson today. If you are going to be pedantic about the intricacies of the English language, two can play at that little game.
The phrase ‘..I am not going to…(verb)’ is a progressive future tense of the verb ‘to go’ meaning that in the future I am not going to bother talking to you. Don’t write this off as a woman’s rule, it is grammatical fact - future tense does not mean or include present. In the case above, the post was letting you know that from after that post, I was not going to bother talking to you.
Why am I responding to you now? Because you are a man, and you do not understand language as you think you do, and as a result I am put in a position where I have to correct you, lest you make the same dumb mistake over and over.
Now I will say this again. Dick, in the future, after this post, I am not going to bother dealing with you.
If you aren’t going to bother talking to me, why did you respond?
Because you’re a woman.
-Dick
Dick. I am not going to bother talking to you. You don’t write or state anything with any intent of reaching an understanding.
Regardless of my man-hash the fact still stands, you are a hypocrite. If you didn’t understand, you can always read the post again.
No YOU have misunderstood ‘if they run’. I [Gent/Effing Pot] was directing Lukeasz’s quote at Dick because even though Lukeasz aimed it initially at someone else, the same rule can be applied to Dick too.
Oh, I’m pretty much leaving the Effing Pot and Gent debacle alone. At least until I brew some of Lukasz’ super-bock… and it’s too late in the year (or too early) to drink it, so Effing is out of luck.
Esther, ‘if they run…’, and you seem to be doing a fine job.
-wolfe
There are only two genders. If you cannot hire the gender you want, you have no choice but to hire a woman.
There were a few two-syllable words in there, but I assume you got the gist of it.
Post again if you don’t understand. I’ll ignore you, but wolfe is very patient and may well try to reason with you.
-Big Al
It’s not as much of an answer as it is a consolation prize.
Good to hear you’re on your way up, Boogieman.
That’s a man for you. Optimistic.
-Dick
Of course you are right Dick, after all you are a man!
This article couldn’t be more true. I work in an office where I am the only man, all the women that have been hired (except for one) were hired purely for their sex appeal. I say this not because they are particularly sexy, but simply because they couldn’t have been hired for their skills as they possess none. The only woman who wasn’t hired for sex appeal was hired by a woman whom my boss made the mistake of giving authority over hiring decisions to. So it just goes to show that women can’t even understand the proper procedures for hiring other women!
You are also quite correct that these women, who possess no skills, must rely on the men around to handle any difficult tasks that come up. In my case, since I’m the only guy in the office, this means that all the women, including my managers, are constantly asking me to fix everything they fucked up. Hell, if they fired everyone in the office except for me and the receptionist, I would still be doing all the work, but I could do it right the first time and still leave a half and hour early every day!
Oh well, some day I will own the company and then I can fire them all at their performance reviews for giving me substandard blowjobs.
Women should only be worried about their own mouth and they should only be worried about putting one thing into it. Am I right or am I right.
-Dick