The Sisterhood of Dumbness
Women have to work extra hard to succeed at anything.
Myth! In actuality, women simply have to show up to be successful. Take swimsuit models. That’s about the most important and meaningful job a woman can ever hope to have or aspire to. Swimsuit models don’t have to fucking do anything but show up and let a man take their pictures.
That’s the real work in modeling of course: the picture taking. The way you can tell is by looking at all the jobs in a photography session and seeing which ones men do. This rule can be applied universally.
For God’s sake, have you seen what some of those models look like when they roll out of bed? Only exactly the same as every other woman in the world. Of course it would take a man to turn that into an object of fine art — or other type of art.
My point, however, is that women barely have to work at all in order to be successful. Think about it.
Women don’t have to learn anything or be prepared for an interview because in most countries, laws force employers to hire them. And if they don’t, all hiring is done by men anyway. Men are smart creatures, you see, and they know that hiring a woman will increase the chances of fucking said woman. That’s called survival of the species. Men are team players like that. Women, on the other hand, would be content to let the entire race die off just to take their precious sense of entitlement to the grave.
Women also don’t have to know how to do anything at work in order to not be fired, as there will always be some man around to fill in her gaps of competence in order to — all together now — increase his chances of fucking her.
The bullshit here is that this is seen as a bad thing. It’s biology folks. It’s as positive as recycling and soy milk — both of which I hate as a man. The biology in play here says two things:
1. Men are predisposed to the betterment of all human beings — including the desire to deepen the gene pool.
2. Women are lazy.
There’s a reason you’ve never told a woman she’s done a ‘half-assed job’ at anything. It’s because when it comes to women, if they even showed up they’ve used their whole ass. There’s a double entendre there that while very clever is much more so when left to your own imangination.
If anything, this is just one example of “Girl Power” actually working to benefit women. By the time a slightly competent woman works her way into a career. And I don’t know how she ended up even slightly competent. Let’s suspend our man-belief for the moment. Perhaps she was just ugly. By the time this uggo is in a career position, so many women have colossally fucked up before her, she’s a shoe-in for upper management.
Women who are even slightly competent are like professional athletes in the Special Olympics.
Related Articles:
May 2nd, 2006 at 8:30 am - IP Man-Hash: d0c4311b71dc2
This is crass.
Men only hire a woman to fuck said woman? How double standard! That just highlights how shallow and superfical these men are.
If men were more professional than women at their jobs they wouldn´t hire women with the intent to fuck her. What a pathetic waste of time for the company. Wouldn´t it make more sense to hire someone to do the job well, rather than obsessing over getting their ends off.
The only thing you have proved here is that men would waste their professional time hiring a woman just to fuck her - says a lot more about men than it does women, if you look at it carefully.
May 2nd, 2006 at 9:04 am - IP Man-Hash: 5950bb08d3016
You need to stop listening to Enya and understand the magnitiude of this post.
What Dick and we are saying is that women get ahead by their sex appeal rather than by their merits in many cases, and the fact that you go and attack us here on this page is proof principle that you agree with this assessment.
Why not attack the argument rather than attack the poster and side comments he made off topic in a satirical way?
You could have been more constructive and said, “no women get jobs because us have smarts”
But instead you just attack all of us men. At least when we make comments we state the facts.
Just like any man that is a real good friend with a woman is a Mangina and he just wants to fuck her as well.
Truth be told many of these people that do the hiring in this posts case are Manginas who think they can score this way and this also doesn’t represent the feelings on the majority of us that post on this page. These same manginas are also the ones that are scared to tell a woman she did a half-ass job.
I on the other hand have fired two women in the past year because they did not meet the job requirements on the job and were lazy. I am not scared by any feminist backlash because I am a man. I also hired ugly women as well that had “good” credentials.
Anyways guys, I started my blog: http://truthformen.blogspot.com/
It’s a work in progres
May 2nd, 2006 at 9:15 am - IP Man-Hash: b522825ecb752
Enya,
You have missed the point about as efficiently as Helen Keller misses the bullseye in a game of darts.
“Wouldn´t it make more sense to hire someone to do the job well, rather than obsessing over getting their ends off.”
You bet your ass it would, but that would require an office full of men…and we all know what fate awaits a company that doesn’t hire women. So, if, by law, we are obligated to employ the weaker sex, we might as well hire on those that would be good for a toss in the sheets.
“That just highlights how shallow and superfical these men are.”
Wrong again. That just highlights how when men are handed a big, lazy sack of shitty lemons, we turn it into a delicious bottle of scotch. Men are natural problem solvers. If we can’t get out of a bad situation, we turn it to our advantage.
“…men would waste their professional time hiring a woman…”
Yup, you’re absolutely right. It is a waste of time.
May 2nd, 2006 at 9:21 am - IP Man-Hash: 5950bb08d3016
Esther, well said
May 2nd, 2006 at 10:36 am - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3
That’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. Some things are more important than money and working, Enya. You would understand that if you weren’t a career obsessed woman with no hope of having a child.
-Dick
May 2nd, 2006 at 2:26 pm - IP Man-Hash: 19105c7fbb7a4
I think you missed Enya’s point also Lukeasz. Don’t you think that the fact men would hire women only for their sex appeal a bit crass? I don’t think she attacked any men personally, she was basing her points on what Dick had said.
The fact that men hire women due to their sexual appeal doesn’t speak well for men or women, in fact it proves both genders to be equally superficial. It was not Enya who was suggesting that men hire sexually attractive women in order to fuck them, it was Dick.
May 2nd, 2006 at 2:32 pm - IP Man-Hash: 19105c7fbb7a4
No. I think what you are saying highlights Enya’s point further. How crass, if you cannot hire the gender you want, hire women anyway because that way you can get your sexual gratification. Is that your answer to every problem?
May 2nd, 2006 at 2:40 pm - IP Man-Hash: 19105c7fbb7a4
Dick I think you should listen to Lukasz, he has some good advice for you.
Interesting that you criticise women for attacking your views by saying you have a small penis or that you are gay…of course, you say, this is typical women stereotyping men, and yet…
…the moment a woman criticizes you, you attack her for being career obsessed and having no hope for having children - it is clear you don’t like being stereotyped, and even rage and rant about it here, and yet you go and do the exact same to women.
You, Dick, are a massive hypocrite.
May 2nd, 2006 at 3:12 pm - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3
What does my penis have to do with being a hypocrite?
Either way, I disagree with you completely because your Man Hash tells a different story.
-Dick
May 2nd, 2006 at 3:44 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4395afe5d7df1
Gent/Effing Pot you’ve quoted Lukasz out of context. The quote was not directed at Dick, but at Enya. Don’t put words into other peoples mouths.