“We’re out there…we women who aren’t bitches…”

I’d like to know what your definition of the word “bitch” is. You’re a prime candidate for the “bitch” tag in my book.

You’re an insolent cunt who comes on a website for men, spouting a bunch of bullshit, calling men “stupid”, and then you want to pretend you’re not a bitch?

I don’t want you to leave,
I don’t care if you leave.

It’s interesting that you WON’T leave though.
Kinda like a cockroach…. and CHER.

Jesus fuckin’ Christ, Chris. twice in one day.

I was going to say, WHY do YOU want the bugs to leave your house? Why do you NOT want roaches crawling all over your floor? Is it because you are AFRAID of them?

Women are afraid. THAT is why YOU are here. Whimmin FEAR DESPERATELY that men will say something THAT SHE IS NOT ENTITLED to hear. They fear that men will NOT SUCCUMB to the whims of whimmin (interesting how the words are spelled the same no? And a feminist is the one that coined the term whimmin, WHAT does that tell you?)

Men do NOT FEAR words. Sorry toots. ONLY WOMEN think that WORDS CAN HURT YOU. Words are NOTHING to be afraid of.

Indeed, your ridiculously failing dissenting view ONLY PROVES our claims. But let’s be honest, you would love to be naked, writing in chains at the feet of a man, staring up at him in lust. It is evident to ALL of us.

If I would “love to be naked, writing in chains at the feet of a man, staring up at him in lust” then wouldn’t I be doing such things.

Really. Well that’s a woman for you.
She prefers doing things she “hates”.

Classic.

Look, I’m not here to attract attention, nobody ever said you had to comment on what I have to say, I’m simply here to express my opinion on these articles and their idiocy because Dick obviously had some issues and I’d like to get some different opinions in here. I’d also like to prove a point by not keeping my mouth shut like the slave you seem to want women to be.

p.s. I’m not a feminist, feminists have idiotic ideas also, no man should bow down and let us have the control, just as no women should bow down and let them keep complete control of them (I say “complete control” because many women DO like to be controlled a least a small bit in a relationship, I personally like to be controlled more then being in control, but also like to have my own say in things and be able to speak my mind, and I’ve had to deal with both.)

Eventually you WILL be doing such things. Whimmin typically deny themselves over and over, frustrated that they have desires to be dominated completely. Eventually some wake up and realize, shutting the fuck up, crawling, and obeying a man, is the ONLY THING that is going to provide her TRUE satisfaction.

No, it’s true, women Do like to do things men tell them, usually, mainly when it involved making them happy cause it’s all we can seem to care about. Yes, i know this, I do this. But this ONLY applies to a boyfriend/husband. And even with a boyfriend/husband, we still like to have a voice and not have to shut up and not be able to give our opinions (most of us anyway).

Obviously Dick DOES have some issues. He has some issues with whimmin being shit fuck stupid. Anyone would. Anyone except whimmin that is.

As far as control, none of us are advocating COMPLETE control.

And:

“I personally like to be controlled more then being in control”

Can I read’em or what Chris?

Keikori, of COURSE you would like to have your own say in a relationship and speak your mind. IF you are speaking REASONABLY, then that is all well and good.

Men are capable of GREAT LOVE. LOVE is the desire to GIVE (as Chris puts it SO well, in fact the best definition I have ever heard). So we are more than willing to CONTROL women, but not ABUSE them. Start waking up to that, and start crawling. You’ll find life far more appealing.

Of course. However, there are times a woman HAS to be told to shut up or TOLD what to do. My ex and I were pulled over by the police who had us put our hands on the dash. They came to each side of the window, GUNS PULLED. Told her to take her right hand and roll down the window. She started to move both hands and started to give them lip. I seized her left hand, told her to shut up, and do what he said.

WHY did I HAVE to tell her to shut up?

Think about it.

And I suppose you don’t see forcing women to do things as abuse. What if we don’t Want to crawl for you, you still insist upon it, and we end up doing it to make you happy.

You had reason to do as you did, you didn’t want to get shot (though what the hell you were doing to get in such a situation is beyond me). In that case, she was nervous and probably heard wrong or was too nervous to think correctly.

It depends on WHAT things we force a woman to do. Was it ABUSE to stop my wife from getting us both shot because I FORCED her to keep one hand on the dash? Sometimes FORCE is necessary.

As far as the circumstance of a woman crawling, you well know what we are talking about. You already admitted you prefer when a man takes control. However, as in ALL cases of relationships, there are going to be things that both parties do, they would prefer not. A woman, that is not keen on it, crawling, to please her man, who has had to listen to her ramble about friends, family, coworkers, and the rest of her useless day, is hardly an exchange in his favor.

Think about it.

“You had reason to do as you did, you didn’t want to get shot”

Who does?

“(though what the hell you were doing to get in such a situation is beyond me).”

Of course it was beyond you because I did not give you the reason. It’s not beyond a man to imagine TWO circumstances. One wherein we DESERVED to be pulled over, and the other wherein we DIDN’T. What were we doing? We cleaned offices late at night, and were leaving to go home. We were behind the building, just as a police officer pulled up, and assumed we were up to no good.

“In that case, she was nervous and probably heard wrong or was too nervous to think correctly.”

Which is EXACTLY what women do all of the time. They DO NOT THINK. They REACT. It takes a MAN to stop those reactions and MAKE them think. Hey, it just happens to save your lives all of the time. But whimmin think of that as ABUSE.

Typical.

We shouldn’t have to exchange the favor of crawling for rambling. SOME (rare, but some) actually do care. (and you may say he’s faking it, but why would he if he knew I’d crawl into bed with him anyway)

Wrong. See, women think that men should just listen. That they are ENTITLED. They are SPECIAL. Wrong on all counts. You GIVE, you GET. MEN GIVE all the fuckin time. Which means that women GET all the fuckin time. But, we are waking up. You want us to give YOU have to start RECIPROCATING. Which means, as men always do, WE START. Isn’t that wonderful how it works?

The THING you give VARIES from man to man. Some might want crawling, some might want you to fix dinner, some might want you to shut the fuck up during the ball game and not keep asking us useless questions about who’s on base and why did the umpire make that call and then asking us if we want fucking nachos when we are in the middle of shouting at the coach and standing in front of the fucking tv to dust. Jesus fucking christ!

However, the crawling is not for the men and you know it. Nowhere did I say in this that it was an event for us. I said that WHIMMIN, particularly INDEPENDENT WHIMMIN, stomp and pretend, because they do not want to admit TO THEMSELVES that THEY DESIRE to crawl at the feet of a man.

Get your facts straight.

“However, the crawling is not for the men and you know it. Nowhere did I say in this that it was an event for us. I said that WHIMMIN, particularly INDEPENDENT WHIMMIN, stomp and pretend, because they do not want to admit TO THEMSELVES that THEY DESIRE to crawl at the feet of a man.”

I’ll crawl at the feet of 1 man, but not just any, which is what most men want us to do. I won’t listen and obey ANY man, just 1. We’re not pretending to be anything, we just refuse to bow down to ALL men, we choose 1 and that’s it. Men will always control women, but women only obey 1 man at a time. You can’t control any other women other then your own. This is a men’s world, completed by men’s rules and men’s control. But that control doesn’t stretch to EVERY woman.

Nor SHOULD you bow down to all men. Notice I keep saying, the feet of A man, that is singular toots.

However, you have finally said something FACTUAL for once. I see you actually THOUGHT about it.

The only statement I would correct there is that, some men, do control other men’s whimmin, not just their own. And even more men control other men’s whimmin, in certain circumstances.

Still considering that is about the only thing that had to be corrected, you get points.

Also the type of control that you are talking about (and we’ve been from the start) is CONSENSUAL control. Bowing down, because you choose to do so. Do it to ONE man only, and by loyal to him, and you’re a whore worth keeping.

s/by/be

The point I’m trying to get across here is that not all women are whores and bow down to all men. Most bow down to 1. Bowing down to one man is not being a whore, it’s being normal. Whores have sex with 2 or more different guys a week.

Men that control other women other then there own are man-whores, so not Only women can be whores.

I’ve thought about everything I’ve posted, not just that last post.

That may be what you are trying to get across, but you are wrong. The facts demonstrate otherwise. You’re definition of whore is incorrect.

There is no such thing as a man-whore, unless he is being PAID for sex. See, that’s the DEFINITION of whore. And it is for that reason that ALL women are whores. Women ALWAYS want something IN EXCHANGE for sex. MEN have sex, for its own sake. That something might be money, “love”, dinner, a date, marriage, three days, meet her family, or any one of a million things. But women do not have sex for its own sake, EVEN when they get pleasure from it.

You may have thought about everything, but that was the first post that was mostly factual. The rest were what you FEEL. The current post for instance. You FEEL that most women are not going to be with more than one man. The facts are that most women are going to be with many more men than one.

Think, pause, post. Takes a man.

What you’re talking about is a prostitute, one who gets payed for sex. A whore has many men at one time, a man-whore has many women at one time. Women will have more than one man in their life time, but most will only have one at a time.

Thinking, pausing, and posting doens’t just take a man, it takes any logical human being, that includes men AND women. What I FEEL may be a matter of opinion for some, but a matter of truth for others. Also, why am I not allowed to express opinion if that’s what Dick is demonstrating making this website.

LOOK, did I not TELL you to THINK before you post?

A prostitute IS a whore. A whore IS a prostitute. They are TWO WORDS that mean the SAME THING.

NO what you FEEL is NEVER a matter of TRUTH when it comes to FACTS. You may FEEL that a whore and a prostitute are DIFFERENT. But you are WRONG. You may FEEL that house is well built and the FACTS could show OTHERWISE. You may FEEL that the mall closes at 10pm, but the FACTS could show that it closes at 9pm.

What you FEEL will NEVER change FACTS. And THAT is where women FAIL ALL the fuckin’ time. THAT is just ONE reason why MEN are better than women. We UNDERSTAND how to separate out our FEELINGS from FACTS.

Explain to me how this website is pure fact then. (no “cause it just is”)

This website is SATIRE.

Then explain to me why men accept it as pure fact. (no “cause it is”)

First, what the fuck is this (no “cause it is”) shit?

Next, the ONLY ONES that think this site is SERIOUS and “PURE FACT” are WHIMMIN. MEN that come here UNDERSTAND it is SATIRE. Satire with some huge fucking boulders of truth to back it up, as is the case with satire. But SATIRE nonetheless.

Try looking up the word in an encyclopedia some time.

Go rent the movie WALL•E.

THAT is SATIRE.

It is a movie and a story about a MALE robot who is BETTER (and more HUMANE) than a FEMALE robot who is DESTRUCTIVE and doesn’t even know HOW destructive.

She BLASTS into his world completely unwelcome or invited and plops herself in the middle of it.

….. the cold female robot ONLY CARES about her “directive”. The moment she gets what she wants, she shuts off completely, without warning, or remorse.

Malerobotsarebetterthanfemalerobots.

Menarebetterthanwomen.

AND….

The “EVE” robot is only there to TAKE. That’s is her “directive”. She is HOLLOW inside. She doesn’t even understand the importance or significance of what she is carrying around within her.

Nor does she have any idea what she is looking for.

WALL•E understands love.
HE is the one who GIVES.
He is the WARMTH of the story.

Menarebetterthanwomen.

Women can GIVE and LOVE if you seem worth it. Most men don’t, so we don’t bother.

Wrong. Again.

You have to have something TO give in order to be able to give it. But, let’s not dallie on that point, let’s get to who women SHOULD bother for, their children.

Are CHILDREN ***WORTH*** it?

of course children are worth it, they are our next generation and what continues the human existance.

YES.. and I I do believe that ridiculous CUNT Megan who can’t even SPELL and said she doesn’t even think she should learn because it “doesn’t matter if she can spell”

…. runs a CHILD DAYCARE center.

Yes.

Tomorrow’s children are in the hands of these idiot cunts. And they don’t see anything wrong with it.

You women are UNBELIEVABLE.

Menarebetterthanwomen.

Men don’t raise children well. They beat them. (not all, but some)

Keikori, you are correct some men beat children. MOST men do not. I know this will shock you, but the facts are that most child abuse and most child murders, is done by women. Fathers account for about 30% of child abuse (and that includes abuse with the mother, its only 17% when it’s just the father alone). Whereas women account for over 60% of child abuse, (40% on their own, more than double that of fathers).

Additionally when the father is in the home, facts show that children grow up better adapted, EVEN in the case of single father households. However, when no father is present, the rates of problems for children are MAGNIFIED MANIFOLD. Greater risk of teen pregnancy, greater risk of divorce, greater risk of becoming violent criminal offenders. The list goes on and on.

Now I am saying this with all the gentleness that is possible. FACTS show that men do in fact raise children well, and it is women that do not. Hard to believe due to propaganda, but factual nonetheless.

Children need fathers, I know that, I never objected to that, and I never said women raise children best alone. What I meant was that it’s best with two parents, not one, and usually it’s best that it’s the mother because if the father wasn’t there in the first place, they probably don’t raise children well.

“What I meant was that it’s best with two parents, not one, and usually it’s best that it’s the mother because if the father wasn’t there in the first place, they probably don’t raise children well.”

Huh?

First part I get, we agree, best for both parents. Then you say it is usually best it’s the mother…what are you on about?

My apologies, I worded it wrong, I was in a bit of a hurry, but anyway, yes, it’s best for both parents to be there, but if one does happen to be missing, it’s better that the one missing is the father. I say this because if he’s missing in the first place, he has no right to care for the children or even have joint custody. However, if the woman leaves with no explanation, the man should get the child, for he cares more. To sum it all up, whoever leaves recieves no rights to the children, usually it’s the men that leave, and that’s what i was explaining above.

Ok, we agree, whoever abandons the children should have no rights. However, I take it a step further, the one that tries to FORCE THE OTHER via the courts to abandon their children, or REFUSES visitation, should not get custody.

70% of divorces are filed by women. So it’s not usually the men leaving.

88% of the time women get custody.

73% of those will interfere with court order visitation.

So you see, it’s not the men abandoning in most cases. And I did not even account for the men that are jailed, because the court orders them to pay more than 100% of their income (an impossibility) for child support.

May I ask where you got this information from? Though i can completely agree with the last part:
“And I did not even account for the men that are jailed, because the court orders them to pay more than 100% of their income (an impossibility) for child support.”

Talk to any DIVORCE ATTORNEY.

85% of women in divorce court will openly declare they “NEVER ACTUALLY LOVED THEIR HUSBANDS’.

(that 85% came from a female attorney who actually told ME the situation for Men is totally unacceptable. She is ASHAMED for woman across America. She said easily 4/5 women are THAT heartless in divorce court)

keikori, LOTS and LOTS of reading. Divorce statistics are prevalent though, and should be easy for you to find.

Another interesting one, regarding deadbeat fathers. Studies have found that when visitation is ENFORCED, child support payments reach between 80% and 90% compliance. What’s that tell you about so called dead beat dads?

Glad to see you agree with the last one. A lot of women though disagree with you and me and think it is perfectly justifiable to charge a father more than he earns for child support, then require that he pays that amount while he is in jail for lack of payment, where now his income is ZERO.

That is an example of what I mean when I say that women live in a fantasy world. You are SLIGHTLY this side of reality. When you are kneeling at your 1’s feet, then you might be a bit more over the line into the real world.

If you want to see some JUST divorce laws Google Brehon Laws (Fenechas in Gaeilge). And THOSE are the laws that I agree with, not to mention the culture.

Which is why I am so OPPOSED to feminism. Feminism requires that women be EMPOWERED. Which means power given, thus stolen from another. Whereas Irish women were always just a source of power on their own, no NEED to be empowered or ENTITLED.

•••• “However, I take it a step further, the one that tries to FORCE THE OTHER via the courts to abandon their children, or REFUSES visitation, should not get custody.” •••••

Yes! THEN there would be justice in the world.

Chris, definitely check out the Irish Brehon Laws. You might dig them. A woman could NOT scream rape if she agreed to “go behind the bushes” with a man, meaning she consented. NOT EVEN if she changed her mind in the middle and he did not stop. She could accuse someone of rape but if it proved false, she could accuse NO ONE ELSE ever again.

Good shit there.