Use It Or Lose It — No Women In College
It has long been said that university is wasted on women. Grade school is wasted on them as well because women don’t need adding or spelling to sit on the couch all day and shop for fucking chicken ten minutes before their hungry man gets home, but that’s another point.
Unless they have some kind of school I don’t know about where women learn how to look thin, pretty, and shut the fuck up, all school is wasted on women. Want to know who agrees with me? MenAreBetterThanWomen’s Honorary Man of the Month for October, Sharon Dijksma. Congratulations Miss Dijk. Congratulations on the prestigious award and congratulations on having something that looks like dick in your name. That’s manly.
The amount of work a man does with his education is exactly the number of years between his graduation and the moment he dies. You may have some bullshit in your head (which means you shouldn’t be reading this in the first place because you’re a woman) telling you to point out retirement as an equally valid end point to an educated man’s utility, but that is false. Even retired men bust their ass every day. They build shit or they go spread their wisdom — in some cases forcing it down the throats of the young, but the point is men remain manly and productive until death. Fuck retirement.
Women don’t.
Women retire just as they live. They don’t do shit. A woman’s productive lifespan is exactly equal to two years after she graduates university to the moment she falls in love with one of her kiss-ass workmates. Obviously there is some variance depending on how attractive the woman is, however, this variance is normalized by the hiring process. Let me explain.
An attractive woman will be snatched up at the workplace in about six months. An ‘uggo’ or ‘fatty’ as they are called might flop around for an additional six. The she-troll, however, will take about that much longer to get hired in the first place. No woman is ever hired on her skills. It’s not because men are sexist or sexy or whatever women say. It’s because women have the same skills as tulips. They look pretty, they pollinate, and they decorate your mantastically majestic house. That is all.
Miss Dijk proposes and end to women and their sponging up all government subsidized education like it’s trash television. I call it the Use it or Lose it Plan. Would Dijksma’s legislation pass, Dutch women who earn degrees only to fuck and trap one of their statistically much smarter class man-mates — which every fucking one of them does, would be responsible for a whopping fucking fine to reimburse the government. If you ask me, they should be fined doubly for the perfectly well-working man ass they kept out of that classroom seat, but this is a baby step. A baby man-step.
This plan is fucking brilliant. And before you say anything, I know a woman didn’t think of it. Dijksma still gets credit for opening her big fat mouth about it though. Women should always get credit for doing what a man told them to do, even if they merely tried their best yet fucked up catastrophically. Technically, that was your fault as a man for expecting more out of a woman than you would out of a tulip.
The Use it or Lose it plan is exactly the same as taxing cigarettes. Should cigarette smokers have to pay for the increased government subsidy of smoking related illnesses. Yes they should and women have no business in college.
Related Articles:
September 26th, 2006 at 10:53 am - IP Man-Hash: 812decc0e5bdf
I would suggest, Gentlemen, that we refuse to be divided or distracted. It is women who thrive on division and who often have no qualms about generating conflicts at the personal level if it suits their egos. And zogmama I do not belive you guilty of this here.
I’m in no position to criticise sons as I have been guilty of a similar, possibly worse, outburst quite recently. What I would point out is that even if you do not agree with his manner it is predictable. I’m surprised more men don’t react that way to feminism as it stands.
Feminists still talk about “maintaining the rage”. They are singularly blind to the growing rage of many men. And men have far more reason for anger than the early feminists did. They do need to see men’s tolerance as a rubber band. The further it’s stretched the harder it snaps.
September 26th, 2006 at 11:08 am - IP Man-Hash: 982e58a96eefd
Dakota: When the fuck did I say I was going to behead Zog? I merely said that feminists are the same type of scum that has been cast from power and killed by the oppressed all through history. I never said I would be doing the beheading, or even be alive before the men of this planet wake the fuck up. Obviously you and Wolfe are still fast asleep. And as far as you and your friends shooting me to death, I can only say “wow”. This is why women should be banned from posting here.
And here’s some knowledge for you about the Iraqi prison travesty: The most egrigious acts commited such as the piling up of naked men on top of eachother and torchering them was commited by a FEMALE probably bisexual sadist who has no business in a war anyway.
Wolfe: Prior to “womens liberation” or as I call it “the rise of decadence and the countdown death clock of the West”.. 99% men treated women the same way you and Dakota do. Did it stop the plague that has spread across this world? Are your continuing naive attitudes that “women are to be loved, cherished, and respected” going to stop it now? Western women are a spoiled child in their teens, they’ve been given allowances they don’t earn, cheated, lied, stealed, and are fast approaching violent destruction and bringing the entire house with them. You don’t simply change the course of a bad apple’s life by calling them stupid and showing them the way, they won’t listen. Some times it calls for more aggressive measures.
But I have to go because the creatine I took has absorbed into my blood and it’s time for a work out, that’s what blood thirsty neanderthal vets like me do best..
September 26th, 2006 at 12:24 pm - IP Man-Hash: dc4b477cfd13b
I’ve decided that wolfe is right and I’m going to take the high road on this one. Give it a few weeks, come back, and decide what your post about beheading reads like from an outside perspective. I’ve said all I’m going to.
Just want to be clear: if I witness an initiation of force against anyone near me, I’ll defend the victim. If stopping that initiation of force means a bullet between the perpetrator’s eyes, I’ll not hesitate.
That said, I hope I’m never in a position to need to do it.
I am entirely aware of that. My point, again, is that that there are people who view soldiers as inherently bloodthirsty and sadistic. If a soldier intimates that someone should be beheaded, they lend credence to those peoples’ views. It’s not fair and I don’t like it, but that’s the way it is.
September 26th, 2006 at 1:14 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
I wish to apologise, before hand, to any right wingnuts/libertarians I may often with this:
-I see crazy people
-In your dreams?
-…
-On Capitol Hill?
-…
-Crazy people, like in the NRA? Amok?
-Walking around like regular people. They’re not sane to each other. They’re only sane when they want to be sane. They don’t know they’re crazy.
-How often do you see them?
-All the time. They’re everywhere.
Just good wholesome humour from a not so leftist pinko.
Cheers.
September 26th, 2006 at 1:23 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Oh, and Zogmama, thy name is discord.
‘Cherchez la femme!’ as some would say. Another inate womanly trait.
If I recall accurately, I told you this place will grow on you. Now if only you can grow on Son or Dick. Or a tree if it will please all parties involved?
Will suffice :)?
Cheers.
September 26th, 2006 at 2:58 pm - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
I disagree. I will say this much: I’ve lived with the virus of feminism and seen its malign affects for a great many years now. I’ve seen families destroyed by it, and careers crippled. Asleep I’m not.
I concur. Worse yet, I’d bet there are some pretty horrible travesties and molestations being committed in our prisons, against male inmates by female guards. Remember where most of that crew on prison detail came from … they were domestic prison guards in civilian life. And yes, “Pfc” England had no business being there, and didn’t merit the title or the uniform.
No, but that’s neither here nor there. You are mistaken if you believe I think every women should be treated with extraordinary deference. Merely those that merit it. See below.
I don’t know what Dakota thinks.
That’s not the quote.
Note the boldface bit. While it may well be that somewhere between 90 and 99% of American/Western women are no good, hence unworthy of being treated that way, until they have proven otherwise via their actions or words (which they often do upon typing a single sentence upon entry to this site) I believe it appropriate to treat them as though they are worth it.
Your views may differ, and I certainly respect that. But I’d ask you to consider my approach. I believe most women fall into one of several categories:
1. Crazed feminists, cannot be redeemed.
2. Spoiled lunatics.
3. Inflicted with the illness of feminism but possible to communicate with.
4. Semi-rational human beings.
5. Entirely rational human beings.
I have met few in category 4, but a fair number in category 3. I have yet to meet any in category 5, but then very few men fit that as well. A great many women are as you suggest:
Consider what you are realistically achieving with zogmama.
You had her convinced (stupidly, I’d think, but Dakota saw it too. Go figure) that you were threatening violence against her.
Here’s what I saw your whole beheading statement as:
You can tell me if that’s accurate.
But that’s not what she (reasonably, I guess, since Dakota saw it too) saw. So, she goes away from the site convinced that you are a crazy scary nut. This is irrational of her, but not patently unreasonable, given Dakota’s own conclusions.
And you’ve solved nothing. You’ve gained nothing for the cause.
I am quite happy to have category 1 and 2 women go away from this site thinking “lolz these guyz are all crazy/fagz/evil/stupid hahahaha”. There is no reasoning with them, and they simply waste bandwidth.
I would prefer to have category 3-5 women going away thinking something between (”They don’t want me here” to “Maybe those guys have a point”).
Now, maybe you believe all women are category 1-2. If so, we disagree. Fair enough. Maybe you don’t care if all women go away thinking this site is filled with stupid/evil/crazy men. Also fair enough. If you think either of those two things though, consider my points and think about them.
You may also think zog is a category 1-2 woman. I don’t. Moreover, I believe some of the most powerful allies in the years ahead will be mothers of sons that watch their boys growing up in feminist utopia.
No question. Feminism has become (if it was ever anything else, which is questionable) a highly damaging and incredibly destructive force that likely will reap a whirlwind. But I do believe many women are at least dimly aware that there is something not quite right with the present state of our society — 6 year olds dressing as skanks, huge out of wedlock birth rates, men rapping about women as ‘hos and b*tches, and women going for the bling.
I think we’re better off engaging those women that we can and making them think.
I don’t think of you that way at all. And make no mistake. Under the strict rules of this site, you’ve got the right to say whatever you want to say and zogmama has the right to … be offended and say nothing.
You served — this would have been true in peacetime as well — to help defend our rights to speak freely. That may or may not have been your goal, but that was one of the benefits for civil society. I honor that service.
All that said, you are gravely mistaken to believe I am asleep or naive.
With respect for you, and great respect for your service,
-wolfe
September 26th, 2006 at 3:13 pm - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
An excellent post, gwallan. Sots has every reason to be angry about what feminism has wrought. I don’t blame him one bit. Yeah, I don’t think Zogmama deliberately set out to do this. If I did, I’d have made it clear I wanted a pox on her house. (In case any literalist women are reading, that’s what we in the writing trade call a ‘metaphor’, rather than a suggestion that biological warfare should be employed against her)
I won’t be a cause of division, and I hope sots understands that. That’s precisely why I say that while I disagree with the tone of Sot’s posts, now that he’s made it clear he wasn’t threatening anyone (which I didn’t believe in the first place), my position is that the final bottom line is that he’s the one with the right to post; she’s the one with the right to be offended, given site rules. Not fair perhaps, but extremely clear.
I ask Sots to consider his strategy and the effect he’s having. I also asked him to consider who he was using it on. (see post 53) I didn’t repeatedly ask, since he’ll either listen to one request or none. No point pestering the man. I did speak up again when it was clear there was an imbroglio.
The problem as I see it is this: anger is often a weapon in the hands of your adversary.
Righteous anger is a good thing, even a holy thing. And sots’ anger against feminism is certainly the former. But it’s a very dangerous thing as well, as any who study the divers fields of fighting/battle/argument/dialogue know.
-wolfe
September 26th, 2006 at 5:31 pm - IP Man-Hash: f41e3f4fea82b
Yes of course Wolfe your understanding of the beheading comment is what I meant. That’s why women shouldn’t be here, they can’t even comprehend the ways men communicate and misunderstand things and go away in tears and fear or just whine to death.
And I did join military to defend this republic after 9/11, not for college money or something to put on a future resume. I’ve seen things more terrible than war. I’ve seen warriors defending a people that don’t give a fuck, who’s wives have left them or are pregnant with another man’s child when they return home from protecting them. Such treachery is no longer even taboo in the US.
What do battle hardened warriors do when they return home to feminist utopia? How do they fit in? They don’t. And I fear the consequences of what is to come..
September 26th, 2006 at 7:35 pm - IP Man-Hash: f2a86239b519c
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4783683486841568387&q=borat&h l=en
Borat meets a senior fellow at Cambridge university who says women aren’t creative, but that they are clever.
September 26th, 2006 at 7:38 pm - IP Man-Hash: 1c904c76f93bf
Wow, I didn’t realise other people here were into Ali-G and his antics.
September 26th, 2006 at 9:36 pm - IP Man-Hash: 21afb798fc0fa
zogmama said:
@abaddon: son has attacked me personally on the basis of physical characteristics, moral and ethical trespasses, and called me many, many crude and hurtful names. He has attacked my work, my family, and my morals.
–I never said anything about it being “right” zogmama. I simply explained why it is happening to you. Son of the sons is an extreme form of what feminism has done to a lot of Men in my view. What I am actually trying to do is show you that.
He doesn’t know me. I have not identified my politics. I am not an apologist for an entire gender, nor any specific subgroup. I express only what I know. I am perplexed by the fact that his angriest crusade against me is that I refuse to respond in kind against him, or against another man - my ex-husband.
–A good way of dealing with it zogmama in my view. —
The very suggestion that there may be exceptions to the rules set forth about women seems to anger him and causes him to project much anger toward me. His posts are increasingly violent in nature.
-I am not a medical professional, however one must ask where it all comes from? There are many variables that could be the root cause of this anger. I think there’s a general sense of frustration and anger caused by feminisms refusal to respond to Mens grievences, as well as the fact that many Men are waking up to how feminism has either ruined or enslaved them through the political process.
If you read my posts, you will see that I rarely bother to defend myself, but when he slurs my children, and my ex-husband, I draw the line. That’s the definition of strength and honor.
-I agree, and a line should be drawn in that situation zogmama, that’s the essence of Strength and Honor. The ability to draw a line, to have the strength to do so and the honor to accept the end result even if it goes bad for you.
-Strength and Honor-
-Lord of the Pit-
September 26th, 2006 at 9:45 pm - IP Man-Hash: 21afb798fc0fa
son of the suns said:
abaddon_fff, I have no doubt of the impending destruction of the disease that is feminism.
But until then a man can be a pussy whipped failure who takes orders from a woman who cheats, lies, and steals and be an abomination before the divine, or live a cold life of loneliness. Sometimes it’s too painful to deal with.
-If he so chooses Son. That is his choice, and the only thing that you can really do is try to wake him up to the lie that is Feminism whether or not its worth it, is really up to you to decide.
September 26th, 2006 at 11:40 pm - IP Man-Hash: 21afb798fc0fa
gwallan said:
I would suggest, Gentlemen, that we refuse to be divided or distracted. It is women who thrive on division and who often have no qualms about generating conflicts at the personal level if it suits their egos. And zogmama I do not belive you guilty of this here.
–Nor do I, and I agree as well that it’s women that thrive upon conflict in that manner.–
I’m in no position to criticise sons as I have been guilty of a similar, possibly worse, outburst quite recently. What I would point out is that even if you do not agree with his manner it is predictable. I’m surprised more men don’t react that way to feminism as it stands.
–So am I, I have a theory about it, I think its because many men are “conditioned” (look up behaviorism or anything by Skinner) by both society and their mothers, and through their mothers and society, limited to their contact with their fathers. I think that the loss of the ideal of fatherhood is a part of the whole cancer that is eating away at the foundation or fabric of society. –
Feminists still talk about “maintaining the rage”. They are singularly blind to the growing rage of many men. And men have far more reason for anger than the early feminists did. They do need to see men’s tolerance as a rubber band. The further it’s stretched the harder it snaps.
–In my opinion, many women don’t understand cause and effect. I don’t think that they can’t, I simply view it as a part of human nature, since they don’t HAVE to, they don’t have to understand it. However, its a basic fact of life. I think that many individual women understand that their power structure (based upon sex) is in danger of collapsing. I also think that many women see what is happening to Men and don’t like it at all. However like many people, they’re afraid to speak up about it.
– We as Men, in my view have a few choices in regards to Feminism, let it run its course, and allow it to destroy itself, accelerate its downward spiral, or try to create something better that allows all of us to live in peace. The question remains, what will we do?
-Strength and Honor-
September 27th, 2006 at 3:59 am - IP Man-Hash: b090cee3b711d
Maybe, but the lasting stench will always be there and be there as a constant reminder.
I am all for blaming feminism on “women” as they stand to benefit the most from it and also assist in ensuring the denigration of all males is successfully carried out without so much as a single protest on their own barbaric behaviour.
The marriage strike is a plain and simple way of letting them know that they have made themselves unacceptable.
Also if any female on this site, moans and bitches because she is upset as she’s been told. That is just too bad. Don’t like it, then bugger off.
September 27th, 2006 at 8:11 am - IP Man-Hash: 175a7bdaced84
http://www.americanwomensuck.com/images/professionalbitchemail.jpg
September 27th, 2006 at 9:39 am - IP Man-Hash: 4555637db20cf
Nice find
September 30th, 2006 at 8:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: b090cee3b711d
And they want to run the WORLD…..!!!
September 30th, 2006 at 10:06 pm - IP Man-Hash: 482492227c51e
I read the comment. I did not think sots was either advocating zog’s beheading nor personally threatening her with it. I thought the no-posting rule for women was uncalled for but seeing sots vs. zog and the cavalry riding in to save her I see the wisdom of this rule now.
Sots’ comments went overboard (the husband stuff) but if he can’t speak his mind freely here where else can he? If he is to temper his comments let him do so on the grounds of being convinced that his anger is making him irrational (as calmer heads convince him). But if it is to create some good impression on certain women…well that’s not what this site is for.
October 1st, 2006 at 4:48 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Yup, Zog and Luka are upper echelon, quality trolls. The rest of them are aboulic. Reference you, Stef.
June 9th, 2007 at 4:19 am - IP Man-Hash: b6f97ac8a94a7
So true. *Applauds*