Use It Or Lose It — No Women In College
It has long been said that university is wasted on women. Grade school is wasted on them as well because women don’t need adding or spelling to sit on the couch all day and shop for fucking chicken ten minutes before their hungry man gets home, but that’s another point.
Unless they have some kind of school I don’t know about where women learn how to look thin, pretty, and shut the fuck up, all school is wasted on women. Want to know who agrees with me? MenAreBetterThanWomen’s Honorary Man of the Month for October, Sharon Dijksma. Congratulations Miss Dijk. Congratulations on the prestigious award and congratulations on having something that looks like dick in your name. That’s manly.
The amount of work a man does with his education is exactly the number of years between his graduation and the moment he dies. You may have some bullshit in your head (which means you shouldn’t be reading this in the first place because you’re a woman) telling you to point out retirement as an equally valid end point to an educated man’s utility, but that is false. Even retired men bust their ass every day. They build shit or they go spread their wisdom — in some cases forcing it down the throats of the young, but the point is men remain manly and productive until death. Fuck retirement.
Women don’t.
Women retire just as they live. They don’t do shit. A woman’s productive lifespan is exactly equal to two years after she graduates university to the moment she falls in love with one of her kiss-ass workmates. Obviously there is some variance depending on how attractive the woman is, however, this variance is normalized by the hiring process. Let me explain.
An attractive woman will be snatched up at the workplace in about six months. An ‘uggo’ or ‘fatty’ as they are called might flop around for an additional six. The she-troll, however, will take about that much longer to get hired in the first place. No woman is ever hired on her skills. It’s not because men are sexist or sexy or whatever women say. It’s because women have the same skills as tulips. They look pretty, they pollinate, and they decorate your mantastically majestic house. That is all.
Miss Dijk proposes and end to women and their sponging up all government subsidized education like it’s trash television. I call it the Use it or Lose it Plan. Would Dijksma’s legislation pass, Dutch women who earn degrees only to fuck and trap one of their statistically much smarter class man-mates — which every fucking one of them does, would be responsible for a whopping fucking fine to reimburse the government. If you ask me, they should be fined doubly for the perfectly well-working man ass they kept out of that classroom seat, but this is a baby step. A baby man-step.
This plan is fucking brilliant. And before you say anything, I know a woman didn’t think of it. Dijksma still gets credit for opening her big fat mouth about it though. Women should always get credit for doing what a man told them to do, even if they merely tried their best yet fucked up catastrophically. Technically, that was your fault as a man for expecting more out of a woman than you would out of a tulip.
The Use it or Lose it plan is exactly the same as taxing cigarettes. Should cigarette smokers have to pay for the increased government subsidy of smoking related illnesses. Yes they should and women have no business in college.
Related Articles:
September 25th, 2006 at 5:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: 0363c503d25ea
you are obviously the one who wants attention. and how would being bitter help anything? so what if she doesnt want to call him a scumbag? could it possibly be that she’s better than that?? people make no sense sometimes.
September 25th, 2006 at 6:12 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7e9f483ab328c
People make mistakes - some people forgive those mistakes, while others vent their self-hatred everywhere. I’ve made my choice, and son has made his.
~Z
September 25th, 2006 at 6:59 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5b9daf5b1020d
So does this mean you’re leaving and never coming back? Shouldn’t saints like you be doing volunteer work in Africa while Tabliban types like me should “vent self hatred” on this site which you’re not even fucking permitted to talk?
And my hatred is not of myself, it’s for females. Don’t worry, I wasn’t born a “sexist”. But the forces that made me one will soon be decimated and destroyed.
September 25th, 2006 at 8:19 pm - IP Man-Hash: 82717b08b3896
I agree with much of what Son of the suns says. I honestly don’t know if zogmama is that way, however the archtypes that he mentions aren’t singularities in modern society, they are the standard.
@zogmama, Feminism creates a good deal of mysogyny. It really isn’t self hatred in my view. Its having to deal with bags of shit that call themselves women. The complete double-standard of “gender-relations. The utter hypocrisy of feminism. What you see in son, is actually what many men feel. We aren’t born this way, we are created. How long do you have to be told that you’re a violent, rapist, oppressor before you start to become one? As to your family life, hey that sucks, but like I said in a previous post, what you’re getting is but a small taste of what men recieve everyday. Feminism and the divorce industry churns out about 2000 divorced males every day that you wake up. The force that you despise is in fact created by your sisters in arms. I don’t think that you are a bad person at all, personally I think that you have had to deal with a great deal of adversity, however so have I, and much of it has been caused by women. For the record, I don’t hate women, as much as I hate their mindset, their thought processes, and their perception of reality.
@son of the suns- Soon the feminist blight will be completely destroyed, feminism is an inherently entrophic system and is destroying itself. We actually don’t have to do anything, but if we decide to it will simply speed the process up.
-Strength and Honor-
September 25th, 2006 at 8:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7e9f483ab328c
@abaddon: son has attacked me personally on the basis of physical characteristics, moral and ethical trespasses, and called me many, many crude and hurtful names. He has attacked my work, my family, and my morals.
He doesn’t know me. I have not identified my politics. I am not an apologist for an entire gender, nor any specific subgroup. I express only what I know. I am perplexed by the fact that his angriest crusade against me is that I refuse to respond in kind against him, or against another man - my ex-husband.
The very suggestion that there may be exceptions to the rules set forth about women seems to anger him and causes him to project much anger toward me. His posts are increasingly violent in nature.
If you read my posts, you will see that I rarely bother to defend myself, but when he slurs my children, and my ex-husband, I draw the line. That’s the definition of strength and honor.
Respectfully submitted,
~Z~
September 25th, 2006 at 8:44 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5b9daf5b1020d
abaddon_fff, I have no doubt of the impending destruction of the disease that is feminism.
But until then a man can be a pussy whipped failure who takes orders from a woman who cheats, lies, and steals and be an abomination before the divine, or live a cold life of loneliness. Sometimes it’s too painful to deal with.
September 25th, 2006 at 8:53 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7e9f483ab328c
@son: I’m sorry for your pain - you can believe that or not - but it’s true. I don’t know if it eases that pain to vent against me on this site, but there may be someone out there that would ease your loneliness. There is always an exception that proves the rule - and I hope you find that.
Peace.
~Z~
September 25th, 2006 at 9:21 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5b9daf5b1020d
Just what are the “violent” points of my posts? Typical cunt thinks any man who doesn’t swallow her “universal truths” need “re-educated”.
It’s cunts like you trying to shut men up with their opinions that will result in real violence. Soon the feminists will meet a fate like French aristocrats during the revolution.
Don’t worry, when I was in Iraq the public beheadings I witnessed looked painless.
September 25th, 2006 at 9:41 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7e9f483ab328c
Nothing violent about that.
~Z~
September 26th, 2006 at 12:00 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Actually, that is factually incorrect. Known exceptions strengthen the rule.
September 26th, 2006 at 1:45 am - IP Man-Hash: a5d80956a3e6c
Zogmama, I really admire the way you are handling the situation here with respect to Son. Great to see someone on this board with that level of maturity and strength of character. Hats off to you madam!
Son, your posts are swimming with intense fury and hate, your constant references to declaring war upon women and violence against women is quite disturbing, to say the least.
I have one question for you: how are you going to change the state of the world (specifically in regards to women) with all that energy, emotion and outrage you have expressed? I think in part in you there is a justified and righteous anger but directing at zogmama is not going to improve the state of affairs for men (or for women).
September 26th, 2006 at 4:29 am - IP Man-Hash: eadd56da2c7c9
Spoken like a man, Dakota.
Making mistakes isn’t a problem. Failing to learn from mistakes is a problem.
Unless you’re a woman, of course.
-Big Al
September 26th, 2006 at 4:48 am - IP Man-Hash: 05bdcb82f843a
I don’t know what your damage is, son, but that was way the hell over the line in about fifty different respects.
September 26th, 2006 at 5:05 am - IP Man-Hash: 7e9f483ab328c
Very telling, if it’s true that son has witnessed such violence.
Intimidating a physically smaller person through violence, or the threat thereof, is effective. It is victory without honor, in my estimation, but you can’t argue its efficacy.
~Z~
September 26th, 2006 at 5:59 am - IP Man-Hash: 63fec4b7bd6b1
Even more lacking of honor is a smaller and weaker person using threat of violence and government coercion to execute a worldwide mass movement of femimism that kills everything good in it’s wake from faith to family. An afront to nature and an abomination before the divine.
September 26th, 2006 at 7:15 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Dakota, you strike me as fickle.
Son may be more than a tad over the line but that’s no reason to lash out at him like that, especially as you’re the third party entirely uninvolved in the delayed remote discussion between two adults, complete strangers to one another.
Plus, he served his country in a warzone, veteran if I gather correctly. Which is a hell of a lot more than can be said of a great deal many of Americans, including yourself.
That said, I hope we can have discussions here devoid of any future undue animosity between established contributors of witful and insightful commentaries. If not, so be it also.
September 26th, 2006 at 8:27 am - IP Man-Hash: dc4b477cfd13b
son, that you’re in no position to take the moral high ground after threatening behead zogmama a la Iraqi terrorists. In fact, in doing so, you’ve lost all of your credibility. You’re just ranting incoherently. See some of the female posters we get around here if you want to see what you look like now.
Furthermore, be advised that if you ever attempt to actually implement your beheading plan, you will find me between you and your intended victims.
I’ll bring friends. We’ll all have guns — I’m looking at my Kimber Custom Classic as I write this and imagining how good a .45-inch hole would look between the eyes of someone so barbaric as to hack a person’s head off.
September 26th, 2006 at 8:32 am - IP Man-Hash: dc4b477cfd13b
Well, what can I say? I’m as offended at his threat to behead zogmama as I am by Female’s threats to emasculate men. At least with Female, we’d be alive to fight another day. zogmama would just be dead.
Plus, he served his country in a warzone, veteran if I gather correctly. Which is a hell of a lot more than can be said of a great deal many of Americans, including yourself.
So? If anything, being a veteran requires him to hold himself to a much higher standard.
There are people in the US (myself emphatically not among them) who believe that people in the military are inherently bloodthirsty. They think that the Iraq prison scandal is standard procedure and that soldiers in general enjoy tormenting and/or torturing prisoners.
By threatening to behead zogmama like an Iraqi terrorist, he lends credence to the views of those kinds of people.
September 26th, 2006 at 8:57 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
This discussion has turned into a real class act.
September 26th, 2006 at 9:31 am - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
Here’s the corrected post. Wordpress really needs to improve their parser.
Relax.
No one posting here, with the exception of Big Al, and the debatable exception of Dakota’s earlier posts is covering himself/herself with glory.
This is pointless and futile.
I’ll take this opportunity to say this, since I’ve been pondering it for a while.
This site has some brilliant writing. Dick is a very smart guy. Some of the other people posting here are not dim either.
I perceive a substantial shift in tone towards women posting here. It’s evolved from “Honey, you’re no Einstein” to multiple people all chiming “F— off the site, c—” upon early posts.
Something I really liked about this site from day one, was Dick’s straightforward MANtra — “men are better than women, but we don’t hate women”.
It was a good response. It was an accurate response.
I don’t think Sots meant to threaten Zogmama with beheading. Dakota does, Zog does, some others do. (Maybe sots did in which case obviously I didn’t read him well). It was, nevertheless a tasteless remark. So too was Zog continuing to post and accuse him of such.
My three principles for this site?
1. Women aren’t the enemy;
2. Feminism is the enemy.
3. Men are better than women. (—- most important.
Now: here’s an important point. Men tend to defend women, especially women for whom we have some very modest degree of empathy, and that’s pretty easy. Whether it’s genetically hard-wired or cultural conditioning (I suspect a combination of both), it happens.
That’s one of the reasons Dick is generally against women posting here. It triggers defense like Dakota’s — and mine. I deliberately overcome my ‘feelings’ about what’s been said here, because the game isn’t worth the candle.
The bottom line?
1. I don’t like what Sots said (nor does Dakota).
2. Sots has a right to say what he wants to say here as long as he’s within Dick’s rules.
3. Zogmama doesn’t. Not fair, true. But site rules. Dick has bent over backwards to let me run my blog off his bandwidth the way I want to, and even let me mod a forum using his site, traffic and bandwidth the way I wanted to. An enemy of free speech, Dick ain’t.
4. I see and am troubled by a generally deteriorating tone on this site based, seemingly, upon misogyny.
I hope this post will contribute to some sober second thought. If women want to post in response to it (explicitly including criticizing and arguing with my views) they are welcome to over at wolfe’s Musings. Post there; don’t post further here is my advice.
To close.
1. Men are better than women.
2. That doesn’t mean women are awful, or anything less than (in the case of a good woman) to be cherished, loved and respected.
3. Nor does it mean men are perfect.
-wolfe