Use It Or Lose It — No Women In College
It has long been said that university is wasted on women. Grade school is wasted on them as well because women don’t need adding or spelling to sit on the couch all day and shop for fucking chicken ten minutes before their hungry man gets home, but that’s another point.
Unless they have some kind of school I don’t know about where women learn how to look thin, pretty, and shut the fuck up, all school is wasted on women. Want to know who agrees with me? MenAreBetterThanWomen’s Honorary Man of the Month for October, Sharon Dijksma. Congratulations Miss Dijk. Congratulations on the prestigious award and congratulations on having something that looks like dick in your name. That’s manly.
The amount of work a man does with his education is exactly the number of years between his graduation and the moment he dies. You may have some bullshit in your head (which means you shouldn’t be reading this in the first place because you’re a woman) telling you to point out retirement as an equally valid end point to an educated man’s utility, but that is false. Even retired men bust their ass every day. They build shit or they go spread their wisdom — in some cases forcing it down the throats of the young, but the point is men remain manly and productive until death. Fuck retirement.
Women don’t.
Women retire just as they live. They don’t do shit. A woman’s productive lifespan is exactly equal to two years after she graduates university to the moment she falls in love with one of her kiss-ass workmates. Obviously there is some variance depending on how attractive the woman is, however, this variance is normalized by the hiring process. Let me explain.
An attractive woman will be snatched up at the workplace in about six months. An ‘uggo’ or ‘fatty’ as they are called might flop around for an additional six. The she-troll, however, will take about that much longer to get hired in the first place. No woman is ever hired on her skills. It’s not because men are sexist or sexy or whatever women say. It’s because women have the same skills as tulips. They look pretty, they pollinate, and they decorate your mantastically majestic house. That is all.
Miss Dijk proposes and end to women and their sponging up all government subsidized education like it’s trash television. I call it the Use it or Lose it Plan. Would Dijksma’s legislation pass, Dutch women who earn degrees only to fuck and trap one of their statistically much smarter class man-mates — which every fucking one of them does, would be responsible for a whopping fucking fine to reimburse the government. If you ask me, they should be fined doubly for the perfectly well-working man ass they kept out of that classroom seat, but this is a baby step. A baby man-step.
This plan is fucking brilliant. And before you say anything, I know a woman didn’t think of it. Dijksma still gets credit for opening her big fat mouth about it though. Women should always get credit for doing what a man told them to do, even if they merely tried their best yet fucked up catastrophically. Technically, that was your fault as a man for expecting more out of a woman than you would out of a tulip.
The Use it or Lose it plan is exactly the same as taxing cigarettes. Should cigarette smokers have to pay for the increased government subsidy of smoking related illnesses. Yes they should and women have no business in college.
Related Articles:
September 24th, 2006 at 7:24 pm - IP Man-Hash: 2f2d948528fdf
agreed.
September 24th, 2006 at 7:25 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Behold the mice roar.
For the cat has left the home.
September 24th, 2006 at 7:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: 05bdcb82f843a
Sandra, what drives our mistrust of women is generally a lifetime of having observed them.
In point of fact, my mother is a wonderful person who raised two happy, well-adjusted children. When I was in college, I was a full-blown small-c communist and a feminist.
I learned better by experience in both cases.
The thing that feminists who come to this site can’t comprehend is that most men share our horrific experiences with women. That’s why men who come to this site uniformly find it a safe haven where they can express unpopular (to women) views.
I can talk to any man my age and we immediately have in common that we’ve been the victim of some woman’s irrational behavior. I have never — not once — spoken to a man who felt like he never got the shaft from a girlfriend or a spouse. It’s never happened. Ever.
What you’re seeing here is a few lifetimes of experience talking, that’s all. I hate that it’s the truth, but it is. Modern women are turning into something extremely nasty toward men. We’ve just come here to bitch about it.
September 24th, 2006 at 8:43 pm - IP Man-Hash: 88c1e58dc3ca7
I find it curious that you are addressing her (S) as though she, herself, is not a woman - ‘Man ipulation’ Technique Exhibit #1
Now which ‘both cases’ are you referring to here: your lifetime’s worth of observance & the wonderful woman that your mother is; or, the wonderful woman that your mother is & your ‘full-blown’ slants…?
Either way you are attempting to ease S’s defences by showing a single, isolated example [albeit substantial since it is your mother after all] of a woman who didn’t betray you and behave in the more ‘habitchual’ ways that you claim women are wont to do. Then you ‘identify’ with her on the ‘feminist’ plane - ‘Man ipulation’ Technique Exhibit #2
{Also, your conclusion that you “learned better by experience in both cases” is more ambiguous than not, however nicely phrased; I have to lend it to you for committing at least two acts of logical fallacy so seamlessly…brilliant.}
How very socially productive of that uniform/unanimous [not true btw as some gentle-men actually tell it like it is...give and take, tit for tat, etc.] population/sample of men to run to a safe-site where they can express those “unpopular views” - that’s really being ‘part of the solution’ isn’t it - ‘Penis & Placebo Penis Pity Party’ Exhibit #1
Boo Hoo.
Playing the victim is so… unbecoming. For anyone - ‘Penis & Placebo Penis Pity Party’ Exhibit #2
Like women have never been ’screwed’ by some ’slickcock’ who seemed to have his shit together, but later turned out to be some parasite, either emotionally or financially, more often than never both!
Oh, is that all.
And just who are “Modern women”? And if they’re still in the “turning into” phase there must still be time to do something about it - right [instead of just 'write'] this great wrong.
Hmmm, I wonder if this “nasty” phase could have anything to do with the suppression, abuse, etc. that women have endured over the ages…starting with being blamed for mankind’s sufferings by tempting the weakest of weak with a silly ‘ol apple… - ‘Penis & Placebo Penis Pity Party’ Exhibit #3
As Yoda would say “do or do not, there is no try”, so Sandra do yer’ thing [girlfriend] and make no apologies for it - you mustn’t allow yourself to be ‘Man ipulated’ into joining this ‘Penis & Placebo Penis Pity Party’, unless of course you have ulterior motives and can make it work for you…without breaking too many balls, I mean hearts…
September 24th, 2006 at 9:19 pm - IP Man-Hash: 05bdcb82f843a
I’m going to cover most of your post thusly:
I can’t help what I’ve observed over 40 years, but observe it I have. I choose not to ignore it or wish it wasn’t so, but rather to do what I can about my little corner of the world and then not worry about the rest.
And I can’t speak for other men on the site. As always, these represent my interpretation and your mileage may vary.
I would characterize them as women from my generation or later living in the United States (though this may well apply to any country that’s embraced feminist dogma). Essentially any woman born from 1960 to the present in the US.
I doubt there’s anything men can do about it. If women are to be turned from their pathologically self-destructive behavior, it has to come from other women.
Unlikely, considering that the period of pathologically self-destructive behavior coincides exactly with increased freedom among individual women. Were there a causal relationship, then self-destructive behavior should have been observed during the period of highest oppression. As it turns out, exactly the reverse is true: as women have become more free, they’ve chosen to behave increasingly self-destructively.
That last statement rather speaks for itself, sadly.
I’m curious: do you have see anything wrong with advising a woman to break mens’ hearts and/or balls if it will help her get ahead in life? Do you have any conception that this sort of behavior is self-destructive in the long term, particularly to young women like Sandra?
September 25th, 2006 at 8:41 am - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
I can state with confidence that these women are prevalent in Canada and the UK as well. I am told they are ubiquitous in Australia and NZ. My observations suggest that the US was the source of much of the feminist mindset especially later waves of gender feminism.
The condition appears to have metastasized to the greatest degree in Canada, probably because of the country’s sad mid-to-late 20th century propensity for feel-good irrational socialist nonsense. The UK is probably next, then Aus or the US (almost as bad).
-wolfe
September 25th, 2006 at 8:50 am - IP Man-Hash: 0da82aefb99ab
@son of the suns: men on this site state that women hate babies and make lousy parents and should work for a living and support themselves, yet you turn around and appear to be criticizing me for supporting my husband so that he could stay home and raise our children.
believe me, he wasn’t able to do that without my dimes.
pick a position and stick with it.
~z~
September 25th, 2006 at 10:34 am - IP Man-Hash: 8318f89075fb5
My only point is that you supported some scumbag pretty boy who fucked you once a week when he wasn’t fucking your friends, listening to rap, or doing whatever else the thugs and dirtbags feminists like you are so in love with do.
Oh well, I bet he was over 6 feet tall and good looking, you got to propagate his “superior genes”, and now you’re here on a site of hard working, godly, wealth creating, thinking men to find some dumbfuck to take care of you and your mistakes the second Nasa realizes you don’t know your fat ass from a o-ring, and fires you. Ooooo the truth the truth, how beautiful and true it burns through the pathetic deceptions of the cunt.
As far the “opninions of this site”, I’m a man and have my own opinions, some that this site shares, some it does not. Unlike you and your ilk, I’m not some useless pack animal cunt hivemind who is easily brainwashed by Orca or Gloria Steinem.
September 25th, 2006 at 10:47 am - IP Man-Hash: dc4b477cfd13b
@son: I’m unclear about the ire directed at zogmama. To me, she sounds like one of the good ones, few and far between though they may be.
I think your accusation that she’s come to the site to find a man to support her is extremely misplaced. Regardless of what eHarmony may want you to think, the Internet is a terrible place to find a mate, and this site would be the last place a sane woman would look for one on the Internet.
It sounds like she made a mistake in the man she married, true. But then, so did I. Living in a glass house as I am, I think I’m in a poor position to throw stones.
In all, I think it’s really inappropriate to be coming down on her like this. If you want to come down on someone, choose one of the serious nutbars that come around. You know the ones: the types who support pedophilia as long as it’s boys, or advise young girls to break hearts if it will help them get ahead.
zogmama hasn’t said anything like that, so what’s the deal? I grant you, she violates the site rules by posting here, but she’s not disruptive like the last 98 out of a hundred women who’ve posted.
September 25th, 2006 at 11:06 am - IP Man-Hash: 0da82aefb99ab
@son of the suns: I don’t consider the father of my children a scumbag, a thug, or a dirtbag; nor have I said anything of the sort on or off this site. He was an unfaithful spouse - nothing more, nothing less - and he most emphatically does not deserve what you’ve posted about him. He is, however, over 6 feet tall - I’ll grant you that.
@Dakota: thanks for being fair - I’m also from the northern plains (my father grew up near Pierre, my mother near Aberdeen) - and I appreciate your clear-headed, independent spirit.
~Z~
September 25th, 2006 at 1:28 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5899659446e16
Big surprise zogslut you’re poor “unfaithful spouse” is over 6 feet tall and gave you years of wasted time and you lack the altruism to call him what he is: A piece of trash. It’s to be expected, you are a woman.
In the meantime, an American male at 5′8 or less who may have the personal qualities of Christ himself can’t even get a date with picky little body idolaters like yourself.
Dakota: I could give a fuck what she says or does now, the fact is she’s just another used up slut who decides past her prime when the skin starts sagging after she’s bred with scummy thugs purely for their looks, that it’s time to “settle down” and stop being such a harpie. But, she didn’t decide anything, the simple fact is none of the pretty boys want her anymore.
Dakota, you have said yourself that you lack the neccessary tools to see into women’s true nature, I however do not. And as far as shitting on Female and germs, everyone knows they’re sick little pervs and has told them so plenty. I’ll take this battle. Because there’s nothing that disgusts me more than females being degenerates and living in sin up until their prime is over then “settling” for the only thing that will take them. I saw on some Christian show some 30 yr old cunt who left her perfect home and husband 8 years earlier, lived life as a full blown carpet eater the whole time, begs her pussified husband to take her back and the IDIOT does. 8 years of abandonement and outright sin. Sad and pathetic man that takes “that” back.
September 25th, 2006 at 1:47 pm - IP Man-Hash: dc4b477cfd13b
Well, I can’t argue with my own past misjudgements: they speak for themselves.
I’m curious how you can so easily tell the kind of person zogmama is, then. In the immortal words of Algore, I’m “serial.” If she’s the way you’re describing her, how can you tell? If I’m missing something that obvious, I’d honestly like to know what you’re seeing because it would be legitimately useful to me in judging women in the future.
September 25th, 2006 at 2:00 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5899659446e16
It’s no great magical power, I just look at a person’s entire picture. The now is only the now, there is also the past. Unfortunately in real life, you have not much chance of knowing a women’s true past because they’re serial liars.
And in my opinion an old middle aged hag who has become a moderate rather than a raving lunatic feminist, is barely above a lifetime faithful like Germs.
In some ways it’s even more disgusting to me, because lots of these women have the baggage of their failure past and now they’re “reformed” and everyone’s suppose to just deal with it and welcome them and their fatherless children. Whereas people like Female and Germs will just die unloved and alone and no one has to deal with them except their whore friends, if they don’t die of AIDS first.
September 25th, 2006 at 2:54 pm - IP Man-Hash: 05bdcb82f843a
I guess what I don’t understand, son, is this:
How are you able to glean all this information from zagmama based on what she’s posted? How can you tell, for example, that her ex was good looking? Maybe I missed it, but I don’t see enough in her posts to come to any conclusion one way or the other.
Again, for purposes of helping me in any future relationships I might have, I’m honestly curious how you can tell these things about her.
September 25th, 2006 at 3:32 pm - IP Man-Hash: 0da82aefb99ab
@Dakota: never mind. Rants like son’s are what make women bitter to begin with. He is blinded by something in his past - serial rejection by women? I can’t say, because I don’t judge people without knowing them.
Anyone with that much bitterness is unhappy indeed. As for my ex being good looking? In the eye of the beholder, I suppose. I’m not old, I’m not a hag, and my children are not fatherless.
@son: as the truth about me is of no concern to you, I won’t waste my time correcting your cruel assessment of me and my family. However, I believe that refusing to resort to a cruel, crude, and unfair characterization of my ex-husband shows altruism, indeed. I strive to treat others as I wish to be treated: with fairness and without being unkind.
~Z~
September 25th, 2006 at 4:05 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4d84ec709d3bf
Wolfe,
I have to admit that I didnt tend to run into the evil feminist woman until I was almost 18. Up to that point every one of my friends, male and female were polite and easygoing. Even for dating. (In canada BTW) but ALL of them were still living with thier birth parents ( +2 Adoptions). The first really nasty woman I ran into was living with just her mother, and so did all HER friends, who were just as nasty as I later learned. It makes me wonder about the chicken and the egg problem. Do women become nasty because of a feminist culture of mysandry, or do women become nasty because the feminist destruction of the nuclear family?
(If any woman wants to argue about how this culture isnt full of misandry, the NEXT email joke you get, reverse the genders. If it isnt funny anymore then its just man-hating trash)
It seems that all western societies are embracing feminism, and that the more socialist those societies were to start, the faster that feminism spread. Canadas’s embrace of socialism is a right royal pain, and my governments general leanings towards it have only helped the feminist movement, given feminism is primarily a socialist movement to begin with.
I’d put Canada and Aus at the top, followed by britain then US. Some of the news articles coming out of Britain on Angry Harry are truly Frightening to read!
September 25th, 2006 at 4:53 pm - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
@Son, I think you’re quite off-base on zog, based upon the evidence. I think even Dakota is wrong on Female, but unlike zog, she’s given him plenty of evidence to think as he does. And lest any think I’m going to defend all women posting here, seeing Sandra’s lack of punctuation gives me a headache, and seeing smrtpants’ abuse of punctuation gives me a bigger headache. Other men think those two have things worth reading, so fair enough.
I do think unleashing heavy firepower on every woman that posts is sort of pointless, and I’ve seen some increasingly disturbing things over the last few weeks.
@John - Yeah, I spent part of my formative years in French Canada, and hit the “madelles” (for non-french, Ms., only with an even bigger chip on their shoulders, if you can imagine) at about age 12. Spent the rest in US, and some time working in the UK, so have some knowledge of all three countries.
It was a thoroughly unpleasant experience, and really rattled my naive, generally pro-feminist views of the time. Sadly for me, these views didn’t get completely eliminated until my early 20’s.
Excellent question. I’d guess the destruction of the nuclear family made it possible for truly large numbers of women to become so nasty. Certainly misandry started it off with the initial feminists, but it really couldn’t metastasize until the nuclear family had been so badly crippled.
No argument there. Let’s hope their new government becomes a majority one and is around for 10-15 years.
Yeah, I don’t know enough about Aus first hand to really rate how much of a feminist mess they’re in, though I can judge a little by what people post here. So I certainly shan’t argue your ranking.
-wolfe
September 25th, 2006 at 5:07 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4e226e1d48210
Dakota, because I can percieve vast information about people merely by hearing what they say and how they speak. Female the insane cunt calls it “emotional intelligence”. I like to call it “political insights”. Much more manly.
Women are nothing like men. All women have a dark selfish impulse that they’ll do anything and anyone to achieve. For some it’s gold and loot, other’s it is drama, and some it’s all about procreating with the most “genetically superior” man they can trap by any means possible. So when zogmama the slut started talking about supporting her hubby for 12 years and then he cheated on her, I already suspected she was the the last type. When she admitted he was over 6′ tall and refused to call him anything negative for his degenerate actions, I knew it to be true. The man was nothing but walking baby batter to her.
Zogmama, yes I have been rejected before. Wow, you got me. But explain to me what’s your fucking point? Thanks for proving the laws of women though. Meanwhile, you’re still a body worshipping idolator and if hubby wanted another chance you wouldn’t have a second thought. Because the only thing women like more than a man who beats them.. is a man who cheats on them.
September 25th, 2006 at 5:17 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7e9f483ab328c
@son: I “admitted” my ex-husband was over 6 feet? Is that some sort of shameful thing? Are all the good men under 5′8″? I’m quite sure that none of us can be blamed for our genetics. We grow, then we stop growing. End of story.
My father, a man of great character and principle, is 5′2″ tall, but that’s not why he’s a good man. He’s a good man because he is fair and intelligent and kind. I’m seriously puzzled by your height/value scale for men.
Respectfully submitted,
~Z~
September 25th, 2006 at 5:31 pm - IP Man-Hash: 26f4f7a9eeb8a
You tell me the value of short men Zogmama, apperently you’re so obsessed with appearence that you supported a fucking dirtbag and refuse to call him so even when he cheated.
Or, you could just fuck off the site since you’re not wanted. Either way I’m going to drink beer so you’ll be talking to yourself the next 8 times you reply and beg for attention.