Come to my site.

http://www.voy.com/219711/

Women are the scum of the earth and they know it. Especially nurses!

Dear Brothers I have posted before that I have no problems with cunts in my personal life, I can have cunts when I want to based on my wants and not needs because I have spiritually mastered myself.
My anger is temperory and I only use it as a tool when I need it. Hatred will destroy anything that consumes it! I might be the only guy here that might actually get the job done of bringing absolute patriarchy! I am a modern a day Genghis Khan, my allegiance to my brotherhood is emaculateand solid! Using all the modern MAN-MADE technology available we have tracked every Cunt who wants kill men on the the the number is staggering, it is 82,030,659 to the day!!! Please spread this news to every guy on the planet. All these cunts are working day and night to eradicate our rights, destroy are health and lives! Nobody on the website even talks about feminazis?!! Brothers start focusing on people who want to kill you! http://www.christianparty.net/feminism 8 Trillion dollars have already being spent on eradicating men in the US!!! The male population has dropped by 10% percent! Does that not make you angry? A man commits suicide every 25th divorce! Does that not make you ANGRY? These are my fellow brothers! Men are rotting in millions of men are rotting in jail because some cunt decided to cook up a story! Does that not make you angry Harry, Chris, Watcher, STack, micho and the rest of the guys? When a 11 year old boy gets raped by a 38 year old cunt and she gets pregnant with his kid, and she walks away free while the goverment confiscates the $200 kid has saved shovelling snow and forces the kid to pay child support, does that not make you want to tear these cunts to shreads? When universities all overthe world teach the SCUM Manifesto and other similar propaganda of eradicaring men from the earth under gender/ women studies to millions and millions of women for the last fifty years, do you expect me to do? Do you guys not know the plans of the enemy? http://www.manhater.org When lesbian gangs go shooting injuring men and raping other women am I to just except it?http://mensrightsmovement.net/impact.html
I have already invested incredible amount of time money energy to bring in Male Supremacy and Absolute Male Dominated Patriarchy!
I am fighting for you brothers! From the beginning of time everything we have is gives to us by men! And I will honour them! FOCUS on the 82,030,659 CUNTS WHO WANT TO ERADICATE US FROM THE WORLD! THIS INFORMATION IS PRECISELY ACCURATE FOR THE DAY! http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=89815961320
Groups of castrate all men all over internet! This one is by Maxine Healey and Samantha Thomas from Wales http://www.facebook.com/people/Maxine-Healey/699711987
http://www.facebook.com/people/Samantha-Thomas/582097891
GUYS SPREAD THE NEWS AND FOCUS ON THE 82 MILLION PLUS CUNTS WHO WANY TO KILL YOU! I will get the job done if I have to do it buy myself! There may more videos articles, medai and data I want to shshare with you so shall we all create Gmail accounts we can use the audio talk feature built in to the browser! Alright there is work to be d one we need to group up and stay in touch. BE BLESSED IN EVERYWAY!

tommy, ok, go around hitting anything thats smarter, more rational and diplomatice then yourself, mate you will be hitting everything. Including my cat.

shut your fucking cockholster sarah! dick’s not advocating a beatdown on a stupid bitch like you, just a nice stiff hit to shut you up! kinda like a donkey punch or a strawberry shortcake!

ok what the fuck is wrong with you, now your advocating violence,
you need help.

You nailed it. They are afraid of nothing because they have absolutely no clue what can happen. And it is because they know shit about shit – just like Oprah. And Pussy Phil.

Waaaaaiiiiitt at minute, Dick! Weren’t you the one who said that hitting a woman is NEVER a good idea????

No, because I remember you were like, “Never hit a woman. Never mess up her face, because you could go to jail.” Or some shit like that. Now you’re contradicting yourself?! Explain please. lol

http://www.lycaeum.org/books/books/psychedelic_experience/tib22.html

Commander Scott said:
it is an established scientific fact that men are considerably more intelligent than women because men have bigger brains that don’t shrink as fast as the typical female brain does.

I recall reading about research showing that the female brain shrinks markedly during pregnancy. This presumably relates to the redirection of organic resources to the growing foetus.

http://childfreenews.blogspot.com/2006/10/pregnancy-makes-your-brain-s hrink.html

I must confess that the only desirable trait in a woman is silence; silence is a woman’s glory.

My name is ryan, hi, i like this article. Goodbye~

Miss Manhole:

You’re a frigid, psychopathic Anglo-Saxon whore who deserves to have her face busted in with a baseball bat. And yes, you ignorant, uneducated female cretin, it is an established scientific fact that men are considerably more intelligent than women because men have bigger brains that don’t shrink as fast as the typical female brain does.

I hope someone throws a vial of sulfuric acid into that Yankee American face of yours. Maybe a little disfigurement would go along way with enhancing your personal physical appearance and actually making you popular once again (as a readily disposable sex object) with the boys.

Au revoir.

Commander Scott said:

Miss Manhole (I hope I never have to stoop to your level and address you personally on this site ever again):

Weren’t you the one who suggested that Australopithecus sported a long tail? Moron; how can you compare me to one when you don’t even have the faintest idea as to what one looks like? Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit.
.

Its funny, Commissar, how you accuse me of doing all the things that you do yourself. You accuse me of make speculations of what I look like but then you do the same of me; in fact, you did it first by suggesting that I was a wheel chair bound autistic. I make sexual insinuations of you, and then you do them back at me–oh Commissar, your so fucking creative.
Yea, I blew the austalopithecus description, but at least I have not constantly cherry picked facts and apparently willfully distorted details to support hypothesis that are absolutely ridiculous. A good word to describe you, commander, is the word “charlatan”.

I’ll be quite happy if you no longer address me; I really don’t care to have the attention of a chronic liar. A liar, in my view, is the lowest form of life that is humanly possible. However, whenever possible, I will deconstruct your ridiculous hypothesis to expose you to be the pathetic idiot/charlatan that you truly are. Good day, Commander.

Miss Manhole (I hope I never have to stoop to your level and address you personally on this site ever again):

Weren’t you the one who suggested that Australopithecus sported a long tail? Moron; how can you compare me to one when you don’t even have the faintest idea as to what one looks like?

Functional autistic? You obviously have a severe deficiency in both personal levels of creativity and innate mental capacity if you still need to regurgitate everthing I say and spew it back at me. Learn how to be original and think for yourself, moron.

Ah well, what do you expect from an obviously lesser evolved and intellectually inferior female brain such as yourself? Women are truly mentally inferior to men and your pathetic, unfortunate existence simply proves that neurological fact.

Judging by the highly sexualized language you frequently employ in that mindless, highly repetitive autistic manner you enjoy so much, it sounds like you have a lot of pent up sexual aggression built up inside that highly masculinized female body of yours. Here’s a suggestion: why don’t you go find a nice quiet spot where you can frig that vestigial organ you call a cliteris all bloody day long. If you keep at it, you might (although statistically unlikely) eventually achieve orgasm and break that permanent state of sexual frigidity you have known all your life.

Hopefully, by the time you achieve orgasm (if ever), we will have been spared the (dis)honour of your presence for the next few years.

Commander Scott said:

According to Paul Broca (1861), males have an average brain weight of 1325g and females have an average brain weight of 1144g, leaving us with a mean difference of 181g between both brains. Neither male nor female brains overlap in size or weight and both decrease by an average rate of 2g per annum. On the basis of this information, is it the male or the female brain which shrinks to the smallest possible dimensions within the shortest period of time? If the male brain is substantially bigger and heavier than the female brain, and neither overlaps the other in both size and weight, it logically follows that the female brain shrinks to the smallest possible dimensions within the shortest period of time, regardless of whatever the actual rate of quantifiable brain tissue loss is between both neurological systems.

You know, Commissar, I find it interesting that you feel I am a functional austic. Well, if so, then I guess it takes one to fucking know one, in light of the fact that you and I have gone over the brain loss hypothesis multiple times and you keep repeating to yourself and the denizens of this site the same fucking thing over and fucking over again–that women have a greater fraction of brain tissue lost then men. Since this fact is somewhat true suggests that your autism maybe slightly functional, however, you keep rejecting the obvious fact that by the time women and men die at age 80 the loss for women is 11% and that for men is 10%. So, consisitent with the fact that we maybe both high functioning autistics, I will repeat myself again: THERE IS NO FUCKING DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN HERE. Got it?

Commissar Scott: I can only hope, for the welfare of the denizens of this site and the communities that you inhabit on the whole, that you pay a visit to your favorite Dominatrix, Mistress Alexis (remember, that sweet lady you wanted to choke?). In her dungeon, we can only hope that you will be stripped and forced to wear a ball gag, so that your teeth have something to bite into when she lashes your hairy australopethicus-like ass at US$50.00 a belt. At that time, my hope is that your ejaculate (collected into a small white cup, and immediately sterilized) coincides with a grand-mal epileptic seizure such that we will be spared your autisitic repetative rantings for 48 hrs.

Good day, Commissar.

Women are intellectually inferior to men because, as the great German philosopher Schopenhauer says, ‘women were meant to obey’. It was the process of biological evolution through natural selection which made women significantly less intelligent than the superior mind of the dominant male; it is through this mechanism that nature would ensure that the human female would willingly co-operate, in a state of total subjection, with the superior male in the building of human civilization and culture.

According to Paul Broca (1861), males have an average brain weight of 1325g and females have an average brain weight of 1144g, leaving us with a mean difference of 181g between both brains. Neither male nor female brains overlap in size or weight and both decrease by an average rate of 2g per annum. On the basis of this information, is it the male or the female brain which shrinks to the smallest possible dimensions within the shortest period of time? If the male brain is substantially bigger and heavier than the female brain, and neither overlaps the other in both size and weight, it logically follows that the female brain shrinks to the smallest possible dimensions within the shortest period of time, regardless of whatever the actual rate of quantifiable brain tissue loss is between both neurological systems.

The notion that women are intellectually inferior to men is one of the cornerstones upon which the modern psychometric investigation into gender-based differences in both fluid and crystallized intelligence, expressed as global mental capacity, is based. In fact, female intellectual inferiority can be readily demonstrated on the basis of that elementary principle of physiology which states that larger brain size = higher intellectual capacity. Thus, it has been established that men exceed women in brain size by an average of .78d. When this is multiplied by the .45 mean correlation between brain volume and g relationship derived from the research of Shoenemann et al (2000), we are left with a standard deviation of 0.351. Further multiplying this figure by 15 (the unit conversion of SD into IQ points) produces a male lead in average intelligence by about 5.265 IQ points. Therefore, because the average man has a significantly bigger brain than the average female, it can be mathematically calculated with ease that the average male is considerably more intelligent than the average female; the greater size of the average male brain in comparison to the female is central to being able to fully comprehend male intellectual superiority over the lesser mental capacity of the female.

In addition, it has been further argued by the British psychologist Richard Lynn that relative brain size and mental capacity is highly correlated; because men have larger brains than women it follows logically that men have higher levels of intelligence than women. Lynn also notes, on the basis of current psychometric research, that occupational status and income are also highly correlated with intelligence; men have greater occupational status and income than women, therefore men have higher levels of intelligence than women. Even the greater male advantage in mean intelligence, estimated by both Lynn and Irwing (2005), in their meta-analysis of gender-based differences in global intelligence as revealed on the highly g-loaded Progressive Matrices, as being roughly .33d or 5 IQ points, cannot be interpreted as being statistically insignificant.

Whether we accept a determination of the gender gap in mental capacity as being the equivalent of 8.4 IQ points in favour of males as uncovered by Stumpf and Jackson or Lynn and Irwing’s measure of male-female differences in global intelligence as being approximately 5 IQ points, it would be foolhardy to dismiss these results as being of little consequence. The effect of even a 5 IQ point gap favouring males in gender-based differences in intelligence is ultimately translated into an exponentially increased series of male-female ratios at the higher end of the normal distribution curve of intelligence. Therefore, the male advantage over the lesser intelligent female would be formulated as a ratio of 2.3:1 with IQs exceeding 130, 3:1 with IQs exceeding 145, 5.5:1 with IQs exceeding 155, and 30:1 with IQs exceeding the range of 170. Consistent with the foregoing, Benbow (1992) and Benbow et al (2000) both observe that male intellectual superiority over the lesser evolved and smaller brained female is most likely revealed in tasks of high complexity such as problem-solving with high level abstractions in mathematics, engineering, physics as well as other tasks calling for high degrees of spatial visualization, the sex-typical neurological specialization for which has been heavily integrated into the male central nervous system by a process of gradual biological evolution.

In light of the entire discussion so far, it follows that the greater advantage of the average male in both relative brain size and intelligence should also go a long way in providing an explanation for the omnipresence of male dominance throughout all social, economic, and political institutions around which human civilization is organized. The greater variability in male intelligence as opposed to female, as the German-British psychologist Hans Eysenck has pointed out, has tremendous implications for the socio-economic and political organization of human socio-sexual relations. It produces a significantly greater proportion of males at either end of the normal distribution curve of human intelligence. For example, it can be shown from the research of Benbow (1988) that of those students between the ages of 12 – 15 who scored over 700 on the mathematical section of the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT), there was a ratio of 12.9 boys for every one girl. Thus, it is results such as these which help explain why a disproportionate number of those positions requiring high levels of intelligence or spatial and technical ability are always occupied by men; it helps elucidate the reasons as to why male patriarchal dominance has been both universal and psycho-physiologically inevitable throughout all societies and cultures.

In the final analysis, it would seem that the radical gender feminist theory of a ‘glass ceiling’, in which women face constant discrimination from men resulting in the routine social exclusion of women from the professions and senior level positions in industrial management, is shameless drivel. Male intellectual dominance over the lesser evolved and mentally inferior female is a product almost exclusively of genetic factors; it has absolutely nothing to do with the false ideological construct of male chauvinism, which essentially constitutes a theoretical leftover from the days when Marxist sociological analysis was fiercely advocated by the now defunct Frankfurt School of Dialectical Materialism.

*Australopithecus* – keyboard knacked

no manhole said:

Commander Scott said:

Perhaps evolutionary biologists should cease to consider Australopithecus afarensis as the missing link between modern Homo Sapiens and the higher primates, and look at the obviously intellectually inferior human female. Women, compared to men, are of such low moral, mental and physical calibre as to warrant the assumption that women are a transitional form linking both modern man and the animal kingdom in a linear progression of evolutionary development that has culminated in the contemporary existence of the superior male intellect.

My guess, Commissar Scott, is that you look like an extremely corpulent version of Australopithecus, which was an extremely short bipedal with a long tail. Needless the to say, the prostitutes you use charge triple the regular rate, and so all you can get on your monthly welfare check is a couple of slaps on your hairy ass (or as you Australians say it, arse). All I can hope for is that the next time you masturbate to a hardcore S and M site, the 1 (not 10, like regular men) cc’s you ejaculate jams your keyboard and short circuits your computer so we will be spared your pathetic polemics. Good day, Commissar Scott.

Afarensis had no tail. In fact, no species of Australopithicus sported a long tail.