Whore-o-ween: Now For Kids!
If it looks like a stripper and costs like a stripper then it’s a stripper.
This Halloween, woman-kind has lowered the bar of decency yet another inch in their eternal quest for gold at the Whore Olympics, by giving their daughters the key to the Halloween Slut closet six years ahead of schedule.
If you haven’t been watching the news, or you haven’t attended any elementary school Halloween parties, let me tell you about the trick or treat you’ve been missing.
Jailbait.
I hereby give MenAreBetterThanWomen.com’s coveted Honorary Man of the Month award to every mom and daughter combination who’ve conspired to put their pre-teen in one of these massively inappropriate outfits this season. Good work, ladies. You are pioneers in feminist ass-busting just like me, Dick Masterson.
All women are prostitutes. They’re not all lady businessmen; they’re not all able to spot the difference between a bounced check and a bar of gold; and they’re not all about to listen to reason for the first time as if they were a broken 70’s television set with wood paneling and a UHF knob that suddenly sprouted Bluetooth.
All women are whores.
That’s what Valentine’s Day is. One day set aside where you can pay your wife 50 dollars for a blow job. It’s cheaper than Christmas.
That’s what alimony is. In both prostitution and divorce, you’re paying the whore to leave. If you’re married, make sure you get your money’s worth before the bill comes. It’ll be the size of your phone number.
That’s what Halloween is. Whoretopia.
I’m sickened each time I hear an ad promoting science and math among little girls. Little girls are stupider than their adult counterparts — way stupider. Now we’re supposed to teach them math just because the radio tells us to? I have a better idea. Why don’t we all just field goal kick footballs into each other’s nuts because the radio tells us to? That’s as pointless as putting a Calculus book in front of a little girl and not expecting three hours of crying and 50 dollars of Toys R Us.
No matter what their age, a woman’s affection is the same cost.
Feminism has been trying to cram the square peg of The Woman into the round hole that is The World for years. And they’ve been doing it with such Herculean tantrums, everyone has adopted their motto.
Women are more than whores.
What the fuck is wrong with a whore?
Some of the greatest whores in human history have been whores. Putting your little girl into one of these obscene costumes isn’t negligent; it’s catapulting her into a life of whoring that is very much a reality for women.
Who knows what pinnacles she’ll reach. She could be a famous actress or a wealthy lady-lawyer. Both careers require tremendous amounts of whoring. She could even be president — or at least make a mockery of an attempt at running. After all, who else but a fucking whore grins like a rictus idiot while their husband fucks a fat pig on national television. That’s what it takes for a woman to become president.
These outrageously over-sexualized costumes are not only illegal to jerk off to, they’re also an SAT prep course for pre-teen girls. Buy your son a chemistry set or a calculator. Don’t waste your daughter’s time. And don’t waste her future on books.
The only thing you do when you cram a square peg into a round hole is shave off the corners. Then you don’t even have a square, you have some kind of fucked, rounded oblong with a Women’s Studies degree and a cunt that hasn’t been cracked open since Thriller. Instead of cramming a square peg into a round hole, why not just chuck it into the sewer.
Happy Whore-o-ween to all the men. And to all the women, fuck off my website.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 15 [14] 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 … 1 » Show All
Mansvoice,
I agree that men are superior to women in certain ways. Women are superior to men in certain ways. I don’t think you realize that it takes both to move society along. We are nothing without each other. You may feel that men’s traits are the best. Perhaps women feel that women’s traits are the best. Does it really matter, since you say men won’t even submit to each other, who the boss is? Oh, wait, your correction says you will submit to a man? What can a man give you? A woman can give so much more that can bring a man happiness and yet you will not hold her in high regard….see her role as just as important, yet different? Not allow her to grow and reach as far as she can because you feel it infringes upon you?
I don’t think you are prideful or egotistical. Your comment about how men don’t submit is admirable and truly helps me to understand masculinity. Because in truth, as someone said earlier in this post, we really don’t know what it is like to be the other gender. Perhaps women are not as smart as men. Won’t the natural order of things expose that. If the majority of women are incompetent, they will find their place in society, wherever that may be. But does that mean that women must be despised and disdained if they do have the competence to compete. Women lead fortune 500 companies. I can change a tire, my own oil (although it might be more difficult for me than a man). I have even assisted in rebuilding the engine in my car because I am capable and if I truly wanted to I could go to school to become a mechanic. Do I have an interest in that? no. If I had to could I? Yes. Do I have friends who are helplessly retarded in those areas, yes. Do I fault them for their lack of talents? No. Do they have talents in others areas? Yes. Are they both men and women? Yes. And although I am not sure what is involved in drilling an oil derrick I do have the mental capacity to find out and at least understand what is involved and perhaps even organize a group of men to do the drilling. There is merit in that, just as if I were drilling. Both are needed to get the job done.
You say men could do women’s work, true, but in most cases it would be crappily done, just as if I tried to compete with the best man physically, it would be sub-par. My point is that we don’t have to put one another down and claim the “it’s mine” mentality. The best part of masculinity does not include the “it’s mine”. Just as women have negative aspects the “it’s mine” aspect is certainly one of men’s. Competetiveness is an admirable quality in a man until it begins to be detrimental to society or the group or the family or whatever as a whole. The destruction in our world throughout history is a prime example of the wonderful competetive nature of man spinning out of control.
This goes back to the “dominant” only having true power because it is given by another. Both roles are essential and have equal footing in society. Those who take destroy. Those who earn and respect and give credence are given power. But one does not exist without the other, and both win. So, truly, where does the power lie? In both.
I suppose it is true that a man submitting to a woman is odd, and unnatural. However, a women, a true woman would never want such a thing if her position was upheld by a man as crucial, essential and valid. She would give all, it is in her nature. But it is also in her nature to resist domination. But she will willingly give all when it is obvious to her that a man does not wish to take control but to lead. So, I suppose the real truth is that men don’t submit and women will not be dominated. Men must ask for and aquire dominace and women must give submissiveness and have influence. But still the power is equal. Dominant does not mean Superior and Submissive does not mean Inferior. His power depends on her relinquishing control and her power depends on his counseling with her to make the best choice for all. True synergy cannot exist otherwise. Without such a balance there is contention and dissent; a battle for control. Both roles are essential, valid and of great worth, one not greater than the other.
Hold on. Let me correct myself:
Men dont submit to women, at least real men dont. I will never bow the knee to feminism or women. If women so desire, compete against men/me. Beat us. I am not talking about one sided wins. I am talking about total war, total victory. I will never submit to someone I deem inferior. As a man, I lead. This is part of chauvinism and I expect you to call me a prideful, egoistic man/boy/child whatever. Yeah, I am.
Talk is cheap. Prove it. Dril an oil derrick? Change a car tire? Do construction work? Men could easily fill in women’s roles but the other way around? Dont make me multi-laugh.
I see you havent read my SEAL-Marine analogy. There are great marines as there are great women but putting the marines in the same league as the SEALs is out of the question. One remarkable woman and unremarkable man doesnt affect the natural demographics of things. What this site does, is to identify common traits that are pertinent in today’s women and extrapolate it on a larger scale. Sure, there are exceptions but then again, you are neglecting the message and signal of this site. Can this site hold true a good majority of the time? Hell yes. In all seriousness.
Not really, I believe Dick himself said that women are good at making babies. Myself, I cant help but agree that women are good at handling children. Just know that passive traits such as gentleness, kindness etc dont advance civilization - It is aggression, domination and brute force, characteristic in man which achieves all this. Sure, you can go with the “all traits are important” view but I value the things that move society and the world forward more. I am not neglecting the passive traits in women; they are PLUS but male traits? Definitely PLUS PLUS.
Yeah, which explains the point of chauvinism. There is no such thing as equality or an equal partnership. There has to be a ‘leader’ - treating both partners with respect and love is one thing. Who is the boss? That is another thing.
I have this to say. The weak answer to the strong. Yes, there definitely are woman bosses and leaders and the men who defer to them or their authority are weak betas. If I have a woman boss, I will work under her but I will not submit. As a man, I will only strive to be better than her. To beat her. To crush her. Is it the same if my boss is a man? I dont suppose it makes much of a difference. Men dont submit, at least real men dont.
Geeza said “On the one hand women argue that there have been many female inventors, and on the other hand they pull out the standard issue ‘opression’ card when their attempts at proving female ingenuity falls flat on its face.”
Truth hurts both ways. There have NOT been many female inventors in comparison to men and yes, it is due to being a little busy with other things; monotonous things, tedious, time-sucking, soul-crushing things like scrubbing and baking and more scrubbing and then there is wiping of snot…..shall I go on? These things are neccessary and women have done them for centuries so that men had the time they needed to be creative and invent. Women were not given the same opportunity. I doubt a man would have had the time to be so creative if he was doing all his wife was doing. That doesn’t mean she wasn’t good at it or that he wasn’t smart enough or didn’t work hard or that he couldn’t do all she did or that she wasn’t smart enough to invent as well. The point is that they needed each other. Either one could fill either role if they so desired.
Plus, what about the point that there are also very few inventions from MEN who were sold into slavery? Throughout history, it has been free men who have been credited with the most significant inventions or discoveries. How do you explain that similarity? Perhaps they had little time, solitude or resources. Very much like women in the past.
Now we live in a time where both men and women can take part in either role or take turns or whatever…and that can only be good.
MansVoice said “Furthermore, I cant stand this equality rubbish. Either you’re better than me or you are not. Either I am the boss or you’re the boss. I hate politically correct bullshit which sounds great in theory but means shit in practise”.
Of course someone is always better than someone else, in any aspect, regardless of gender. What does that have to do with anything? Every person who is blessed with some gift is done so that ALL will benefit. Equality has nothing to do with better or beneath, it has to do with respect for the capacity and potential of each person, regardless of gender, race, age, etc. For some individuals that means better than others, for others, it means not as superior as some. Some gifts are given to men, some to women. ALL are needed. What does it matter who gets what?
Men and women are different for a reason. That should be a positive thing but our society has created a negative association with embracing womanhood. It is difficult for women to find satisfaction in truly femine roles because no one wants to feel forced into being anything, especially if it is thought of as inferior or has been “dumbed-down”. In reality, men are feeling the back-lash of many centuries of treating women as inferiors. Just as not all men were chauvenistic pigs back in the day, not all women are stupid and without morals today.
There are women who are more intelligent than men. There are men who are more more sensitive and amiable than women. There are women who are physically stronger than some men and some men who have better intuition than some women. So what? Saying that one gender is better than another as a blanket theory is ignorant and ignores basic human facts of individualism.
And let’s just say that men truly believe they are better than women for argument’s sake? Where is the patience and understanding? Where is the leading by example? Where is the kindness and the gentleness? Every adult knows that you treat a child with patience because a child does not have the understanding that adults are privy to. Anything other than kind instruction and gentle explanations is unrighteous dominion. If women are inferior why do you treat us with disdain, bitch and complain about how we do this or that, or don’t do this or that, when you say we are incapable? Even a child, who is not fully developed, knows when it is being patronized, insulted and demeaned. Every being has a sense of self worth and any creature with any back-bone will fight against tyranny. When I deal with a child it is with the understanding that I know BETTER, and I act accordingly. If men truly believe they are superior where is the attitude of holding oneself to a higher standard of behavior?
In my home my husband is the head of our household. I defer to him as the head of our family but he counsels with me as someone who may be in a better position to know what the needs of the family truly are. By that standard, we both hold positions of power. True, he could refuse to hear my recomendations and do what he wants but then the family most likely would fall a part. Does he truly have any power or influence then? Don’t you see that his “power” or “superiority” is in complete balance with my “submission” or “inferiority”. I allow him to have his power by “submitting” and he allows me to have my power by “counseling”. He holds my opinions and recomendations in high regard and I respect his position as head of our family. But this relationship exists on mutual respect and an understanding that we each have something to contribute AND something we both mutually regard as important; our family.
The rest of the world is no different. Whether you have a women or a man for a boss, they no doubt make the final decisions, but they take your advice or opinions into account before doing so. If they trample over you, sacrificing the objective along the way, they in turn piss you off and lose your cooperation and most likely will not getting the desired results. Then how much power do they truly have? The “submissive” ALLOW power. The “dominant” who TAKE it burn the whole thing to the ground. There is just as much power in the one who allows another to HAVE control as the one who has the responsibility of executing the final decision. Both are contingent upon the other. So, in true reality, there is no better than, or worse than, just different roles in which to play.
And if you say that does not work in practice than it is the individuals who are flawed because for some of us it works beautifully. And we are the happy ones. As you can see, I am anything but PC. :)
Well I am also telling you this. Until the day women live up as “equals”, they should shut the fuck up about equality. You’re correct. Women are treated as equals. Why? Because men are gracious, optimistic and all things positive. Women dont deserve equality - They cant, havent and wont match up to the level of competence of men.
Furthermore, I cant stand this equality rubbish. Either you’re better than me or you are not. Either I am the boss or you’re the boss. I hate politically correct bullshit which sounds great in theory but means shit in practise.
On the one hand women argue that there have been many female inventors, and on the other hand they pull out the standard issue ‘opression’ card when their attempts at proving female ingenuity falls flat on its face.
On the one hand women call us competitive, aggressive and accuse us of destroying things, starting wars and having a ‘hunter’ mentality. And on the other hand they fail to realise that it is due to these traits that we are more ingenious than women right from the days when a woman sat safely in a cave that men dug out of the side of a hill for them while we went out and started making spears to kill any marauding bears.
Your food for thought has been duly digested and excreted.
Geeza said “Make a list of male inventors and a list of female inventors and the diference would be like comparing an encyclopaedia with a stick it note.”
I would like to see a man accomplish anything that requires large quantities of time, solitude and resources (such as inventing) while taking care of kids, running a home, catering to a needy husband and dealing with hundreds of years of opression. There weren’t a lot of noteworthy inventions by men held in slavery at any point in history either.
Food for thought.
Wow. I have to say that I really appreciate Anon and his comments. You have said so eloquently(about God) what I would have done if I could have organized my thoughts as well.
I also agree that many women have become”whores” in a general sense. But that does not apply to all women; and for those who do choose to “whore” it up, how is that any different from a man choosing to “whore” it up?
When I am approached by a “man-whore” I don’t treat him with disdain and disgust. Isn’t it more appropriate to treat such a person with respect and inform them that they don’t have to demean themselves in such a way? That their behavior is unbecoming and unattractive? That I am more interested in who they are as a person, not what they think they can “do” for me, or what they can “get” from me. Isn’t it obvious that when a women (or a man) dresses or acts in a demeaning manner it is because of ignorance or insecurity or simply a lack of understanding of how to interact with the opposite sex as equals?
Equality does not mean “the same”. It speaks to an underlying respect as an individual; one is as worthy as another regardless of specific roles; complementary. Intelligence in a women should not be a threat to a man. It should be a bonus to be appreciated and utilized. A deep understanding of people and the way they relate emotionally in a man should not be a threat to a women but should likewise be admired and utilized. I could say the same about industrious women and beautiful men, and so on and so forth.
We can inspire higher standards in each other and we have the power to do so as members of the opposite sex, using kindness and respect. We all, (men and women) are at different levels of understanding along our journey of maturity. Is it so hard to lift each other up rather than tear each other down? Do we sit around and bitch about the problem or do we take positive and helpful action to create a better society?
Kindness goes a long way. How can anyone know better or raise themselves to a higher standard if no one gives a damn enough to make a difference?
Probably because you’re fat enough to dress-up as a tool shed.
-Dick
Hey, I completly agree with the whole girls dressing up in costumes years before it’s deemed appropriate is wrong, but calling them whores? Is it just a lack of a decent vocabulary? Use more colourful expressions that will make more of a point than these substandard choices. Then maybe you’ll have a better chance of having people listen to your ideas. Anyways… Like I said, dressing children up in lewd costumes shouldn’t be acceptable on any level. It’s trashy and not giving them much to look up to anymore. I’ve never dressed in anything like these for Halloween or ever plan on it…
I did view the site you listed that is too funny. I will check out some sites out of curiousity to see what both men and women have invented. It doesn’t really matter who invented more though. It is not a competition between men and women.
Ah statistics. Simple really. Make a list of male inventors and a list of female inventors and the diference would be like comparing an encyclopaedia with a stick it note.
The list of female inventors show that if women were capable, they could actually invent something if they wanted to but they didnt.
Also, on the list try not to add too many useless inventions and non inventions like ‘naturally colored cotton’ and ‘hair sprays that sets hair for days’. Men already have a name for such inventions and its called ‘Chindogu’, the art of useless inventions .
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2005/05/01/the_art_of_ unuselessness/
You could argue that women have been practising Chindogu for years.
Women Invent in Tradionally Male Fields
As many of our previous women Inventors of the Week have proven, men do not have a monopoly on innovation even in disciplines in which women have been underrepresented, such as science, medicine, and high technology.
One crusader for women’s recognition from the turn of the century was Harriet Russell Strong of Oakland (1844-1929). An entrepreneur and engineer, specializing in irrigation and water conservation, she won several patents for dams and water storage systems. During World War I, Strong went to Washington to promote her bold plan to counter a severe food shortage by temporarily diverting the Colorado River and using the Grand Canyon as a reservoir. When a Congressional Committee rejected her plan, Strong was convinced it was simply from chauvinism. Undaunted, she spent the rest of her life fighting for water conservation and women’s rights.
Chien-Shiung Wu (b. 1912) worked on the Manhattan Project during World War II. She created at least five inventions in experimental atomic physics, including devices for radiation-detection and radioactive-decay wavelength separation. Most notably, Wu designed the landmark experiments that allowed her colleagues Dao Li and Chen Ning Yang to win the Nobel Prize (1957) for proving that the Parity Principle does not hold universally. Wu herself was hailed by Newsweek in 1963 as the “Queen of Physics.”
In medicine, one outstanding inventor continuing the tradition of Hazen and Brown and Gertrude Elion is Ariel Hollinshead of George Washington University (b. 1929). In the 1970s, she developed a unique type of vaccine for all four major types of lung cancer, and invented a low-frequency sound technique for isolating antigens from cell membranes. In 1980, Hollinshead’s work was called “among the most advanced and exciting in the world.”
The world of computing has included many significant women inventors, the best-known being Grace Murray Hopper. Margaret K. Butler (b. 1924) was also a pioneer in computer hardware. Working at Argonne National Laboratories in the 1950s, she helped develop one of the world’s first digital computers for science. Sandra Kurtzig of Atherton, California (b. 1947) has invented monitoring and information-sharing software for businesses. The company she founded with $2000 in 1972, ASK Computer, now does over $100 million in annual sales. Kurtzig herself has been called one of the “heroes of Silicon Valley.”
The achievements of these women have brought us closer to a world in which restrictions based on perceived “male” and “female” fields will not exist.
See the Invention Dimension archives for Virginia Apgar, Katherine Blodgett, Martha Coston, Edith Flanigen, Stephanie Kwolek, Hedy Lamarr, and other women inventors in science and technology.
It is not only men who invent things. Women are just as smart as men. There are many women inventors.
Do any of you men have anything to back up your views? Is there any satistics that prove men are better then women? I can agree with some views but not all. Maybe the U.S. has alot of women who act like you men say all women act like. Where I live women don’t walk around half dressed, women work all the same jobs men do.
A man may have invented the computer but both men and Women fix them. I actually work for Microsoft and you’d be surprised by tha lack of knowledge most men have for computers.
Clair, you’re an idiot. you don’t know what it is to be a man, and the female who thinks she’s more of a man than most will never know either, just like I’ll never know what it is to be female. You have to be it to know what it is to be it, but you’re too dumb to understand that.
And my post had two separate ideas. The one didn’t have anything to do with the other, but in your feeble brain you mix them together because you can’t think of anything else to say other than make a stupid comment about respect having something to do with penises.
No, the problem is people like you who bring up the exception to the rule
( kind of parallels that PC, feminist nonsense “A woman can do anything a man can do!!!”); while in the meantime, just one more of the thousands of things men created for you to use (the computer), you use to spew your anecdotal drivel.
P.S. - Chicks are all we can find in the USA anymore (with few exceptions)
Watch. She’s a middle-class white girl majoring in women’s studies who had three abortions and finds the social pressure against the forth one (a man looking at her funny as she passes him) just too much.
Sorry, we can’t give everything to you. We could stick a feeding tube down your throat and force-feed you to solve anorexia, but you just wouldn’t learn that way.
What a stupid little whore. Those cunts can just be so complicated.
http://encyclopediadramatica.com/images/8/8b/Women.jpg
Congratulations, you’ve given everyone a reason to hate you like the shit you are! Give yourself a prize.
http://encyclopediadramatica.com/images/1/15/Spousal_abuse.jpg
i see ya’ll pussy ain’t have nothing to say when i said men are all worthless now adays and that your shyt talkin is a sign of weakness cuz you know its true..
detached (136) Says:
November 10th, 2007 at 7:19 am - IP Man-Hash: 21625b7036fce
These girls don’t have male role models because their whore mother ran him off.
I DON’T KNOW ONE WOMEN WHO HAS RAN OFF ON THEY BABY DADDY OR AT LEAST DIDN’T TRY AND KEEP IN THE BABIES LIFE….DO SOME RESEARCH THESE MEN ARE SCARED THEY’RE PUSSYS AND SELFISH THEY CAN’T BARE THE THOUGHT OF GIVING UP HALF THEIR MONEY TO TAKE CARE OF A BABY THEIR BABY THEY THINK OF A BABY AS BAGGAGE WITH BAGGAGE YOU DON’T GET PUSSY .. THEY CAN’T BARE THE THOUGHT OF HAVING RESPONSIBLITY OTHER THAN WASHING THEIR ASS AND MAKIN SURE THEY EAT AND HAVE A PLACE TO SLEEP
Ah, our little whore always knows what’s best for everybody else. And we wonder why the rest of the world knows that western women are ungrateful fuck-bags. We give up our lives to save you and all you can do is bitch about selective equality and how ‘getting off’ the titanic first makes you superior.
I’d say that you need help, because our art becomes stronger by the day. There is nothing you can do to stop the truth about how stupid, selfish, and depraved you sluts are, and the acceptable alternatives to avoiding such a whore.
I don’t think you’re genetically superior to an attractive, 21-year-old virgin who was picked from an absolute minimum to a stable lifestyle. She doesn’t expect any heels every month, and she understands her place. She is free of filth and STDs, and knows better than to lash out against her benefactor.
And you think that you can control who I have sex with? Silly little whore.