Women Caused the War in Iraq
Women caused the war in Iraq. It’s been plain as day to me for a while now — because of my mantuition, but I didn’t want to drop that particular bomb up the ass of feminism because I hadn’t yet acquired the proof.
Someone call the CO. The proof has been acquired.
Just like all other wars, women caused the war in Iraq.
Whatever your thoughts on the war in Iraq, there is one thing that can’t be argued: more than 3,000 US troops have lost their lives in battle. That means if every man who has given his life for freedom in Iraq was an M&M, the deaths of those men would probably fill up a fish bowl. I’m not sure about that because I’m not very good at those guessing games. I’m a man. I’m not about fucking guessing, I’m about facts.
Here’s a fact for you. Since 1960, women and their fat asses have gotten fatter by a magnitude of 24 pounds. That’s 17% more Cushion for the Pushin, making women that much more sensual than they were a mere 50 years ago.
But Dick, what does massive and disgusting weight gain have to do with the war in the middle east?
I’ll tell you, my man friend.
The troops in Iraq have been doing more than building freedom and democracy in these unstable parts of the world. They’ve also been acquiring access to oil faster than women at a Midnight Madness sale acquired fucking claw marks all over her arms. Unlike women, the military does it with class — except the woman parts of the military. They do it with no class.
It doesn’t matter if you think oil is why anyone went to Iraq in the first place. The free world is getting its precious oil regardless of intent. It’s like slapping the shit out of a woman. Even if you didn’t mean to, she’s still going to get turned on by it. If you don’t think that’s true, find me one woman over the age of 17 who hasn’t had a rape fantasy.
Twenty four more pounds of womanly personality equals 469 million more gallons of gasoline per year purchased by the average male just to schlep his prize pig to the movies and back; probably stopping at Starbucks or Coldstone Ice Creamery on the way to and back. Starting to see the big picture?
Maybe if women could skip a meal or hit the treadmill more often than twice every New Years, we wouldn’t be so fucking dependent on oil. We would be exactly 469 million gallons less dependent on oil. I wonder how many of those 3,000 marines that would have saved.
I wonder that, but women don’t. They just keep cramming donuts and bear claws into their gaping maws like no one’s making any more, and somehow they manage to fill their air with their braying and jaw-jacking while doing so. It makes me sick.
If all the reasons women shouldn’t be in the army were M&M’s, you could probably stack them up into space. Jessica Lynch and Lynndie England would be a big fat pair of M&M’s the size of footballs at the very bottom; those ones they sell during Easter.
Man, are those two broads a pair of military grade fuck ups or what?
Related Articles:
March 25th, 2007 at 6:06 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Ey? No. One’s fly. Facilitate access.
- House Nation mix p1 - Delerium - Heaven’s Earth
March 25th, 2007 at 6:07 am - IP Man-Hash: a093bb84a3a2f
Female responding to my posts to others is pointless if you wish to have intelligent discussion because I infact hate the air you breath.
Chivalry doesn’t require strength in a world of modern women. It requires idiocy.
March 25th, 2007 at 6:13 am - IP Man-Hash: a093bb84a3a2f
“beyond reproach”?
Sounds more like a baby killing dyke than an angry vet who would rather spit in the face of God than hold a door for a woman.
March 25th, 2007 at 7:00 am - IP Man-Hash: 8d87604c92686
This is a great quote.
March 25th, 2007 at 8:16 am - IP Man-Hash: 35a3bf5e9bc19
I open doors because it gives me happiness to know I helped someone. Especially old ladies, bless them.
March 25th, 2007 at 4:24 pm - IP Man-Hash: 46ec32a4c4603
This is a great quote.
I totally agree. I’m going to remember that one for the rest of my life. Kudos, SOTS. :)
March 25th, 2007 at 5:34 pm - IP Man-Hash: 71eaeac99a872
I’m pretty sure no one here was using the term chivalry according to it’s original religious meaning.
I couldn’t care less whether you men act chilvarous or not, however the fact is is that a woman of average intelligence is not going to find a man who acts like a selish, inconsiderate idiot, all that attractive. And that’s just life. So you can either be rude and remain all alone, or be rude and attract an insecure woman who most likely has a personality disorder to match your own and both be miserable together.
March 25th, 2007 at 7:11 pm - IP Man-Hash: b970e8787af34
A couple things:
You could not be further from correct. One would think that women always trade up, but this is not the case. Women at the bottom of the social hierarchy (dumb blonds, folks born poor) are gold-diggers, BUT, women higher-up on the social latter (i.e. women with college degrees - I refuse to acknowledge them as intelligent) seek dregs for companions. The doctor dates the dead-beat; the lawyer dates the janitor; the politician sleeps with the pool-guy, etc…
Let me ask you Female, what is your occupation, and what is the profession of your last five companions or one-night stands? Why don’t you prove my point for me by not answering…
People are naturally attracted to their compliment. That’s why women who act like men seek pussies for companions (see also: lesbianism).
As for women and the war in Iraq, Dick, I love that your site is opening the eyes of men everywhere, and I think you are among the manliest men on the manet, but I must take exception to your argumant. The difficulty in the weight-gain argument is that a 24 lbs. weight gain across the board is a linear Y-increase on the graph. The whole line shifts upward by 24. The constant factor “24″ can not be considered significant compared to the exponential increase in the species’s weight caused by population growth.
However, I wholeheartedly agree with your conclusion that women caused the war in Iraq. The folks over there in the Eastern hemisphere see how screwed up our women are, and they don’t want that poison spreading. Frankly, I agree with them. The war is about the role of women in society.
March 25th, 2007 at 7:21 pm - IP Man-Hash: 442b15dae127f
You dumb bitch you have no clue what we want.. If you did you would have left this site forever. But you come here proving how you women of average inteligence can’t make anyone happy.
Make us all happy you witch; climb on your broom and leave the room..
March 25th, 2007 at 7:21 pm - IP Man-Hash: 8d87604c92686
Who says that I put up an act, female?
What most women percieve as a selfish, rude, or at times arrogant asshole - is just me being myself. I don’t hide behind fucking curtains, and I willingly share every aspect of my fucking personality uncensored.
And believe me, I’m a fun guy to be around. I’m a great guy to be around actually. But if I get pissed off, or I have something on my mind - I’ll let it out. And only a few people can handle that.
Maybe that’s why they are attracted to me? Because they are too afraid to just be themselves? Let go? I don’t tie myself to the past, I live right here, and right now.
Still your comment got me thinking. Because yes, every woman I have EVER dated, has been seriously crazy in one way or the other. They crave attention, they try to screw with your mind, they will jump out of their own way to make you jealous…. Truth be told. They are nutcases.
March 25th, 2007 at 8:23 pm - IP Man-Hash: 04de1e4af36c0
“BUT, women higher-up on the social latter (i.e. women with college degrees - I refuse to acknowledge them as intelligent) seek dregs for companions. The doctor dates the dead-beat; the lawyer dates the janitor; the politician sleeps with the pool-guy, etc…”
Janitors and pool-guys are very manly occupations, not dregs.
March 25th, 2007 at 8:24 pm - IP Man-Hash: 68229e8f12872
Grow an addiction, as in start using drugs or alcohol to cope.
& an addiction IS something that grows. Don’t even try to debate me on that one.
But anyway, maybe if you were somewhat intelligent, like myself, you might realize that for one, that comment wasn’t fucking directed to you, & two, that was mild use of figurative language.
March 25th, 2007 at 10:29 pm - IP Man-Hash: 71eaeac99a872
No you may not ask as it’s none of your business, however, you are wrong in your hypothesising.
March 26th, 2007 at 2:15 am - IP Man-Hash: 442b15dae127f
She is a professional bitch. That’s not hard to figure.
March 26th, 2007 at 2:21 am - IP Man-Hash: 442b15dae127f
Intelligence is someting others could agree with. I doubt anyone here other than a female would consider you intelligent. I doubt that there are any intelligent women alive. The words “intelligent women” is an oxymoron.
March 26th, 2007 at 5:47 am - IP Man-Hash: dc4b477cfd13b
I know it’s easy to come to that conclusion, Billy, but I don’t think it’s true. There are lots of intelligent women around.
The problem is that they’re incapable of overcoming their emotions. I’ve given a fair amount of thought to this as a father of two girls, because it seems to start very early and it’s not socialization. My kids are among the 95th percentile of intelligence on the planet, there’s no doubt of it in mine or anyone else’s mind. But they are seriously stuck on their emotions.
This has informed how I raise them: in many cases, rather than try to immediately help them intellectually with a problem, one has to spend time cuddling and making them feel better. Once they’ve reached the point where their emotions have subsided, then you can start to talk rationally about whatever is bothering them.
Part of my job as a father, I think, is to encourage them to find ways to deal with their emotions as effectively as possible so that it doesn’t interfere with living their lives. I or another man will not always be there to make them feel better and coach them into making rational choices, after all. In order to survive and prosper, they need to be able to do that on their own.
Yes, there are smart women out there. However, they’ve never been taught how to deal with their emotions, so their emotions totally rule their lives. Since emotion and intellect are often polar opposites, this has the effect of making them appear stupid.
March 26th, 2007 at 6:11 am - IP Man-Hash: 0c5521081aa22
I don’t agree that in all situations emotion and intellect are polar opposites. Not all intellect involves cold analysis, nor does all emotion reflect hot headed irrationality. I guess it depends on your definition of intellect.
Some people are intelligent at how they manage and recognise their own emotions and the emotions of others. In my view, intelligence is not always an absence of emotion using cold analysis or lists of figures and graphs. It can be in how you manage yourself, how you handle your mind (which is in my understanding the root of emotion) and the feelings of others in crisis situations as well as daily interaction. If you look at intelligence in this light it would seem that emotion and intelligence have a close relationship with one another, rather than being at odds with the other.
March 26th, 2007 at 6:52 am - IP Man-Hash: dc4b477cfd13b
Well, note that I said that emotion and intellect are often polar opposites as opposed to always polar opposites.
However, what I really meant was this:
When something unpleasant happens in one’s life, one’s first reaction is always emotional. There may be perfectly valid reasons to have an emotional reaction, but the reaction itself usually interferes with how you deal with whatever happened. In order to cope, you eventually have to move past pure emotion and look at what you can do about your situation.
It doesn’t mean that the emotional reaction is invalid or that you should subsume it. It just means that if all you ever do is wallow in your emotional reaction, the problem itself will never get solved.
One of the many differences between men and women is that women rarely move past their emotional reaction. They get stuck on it, wallow in it, and if they ever take action, it’s based entirely on their emotions with little intellect behind it. This can often have the effect of making the situation worse.
It really depends on the circumstance to a great extent. Bottom line, however: women get stuck on how they feel and never gain any perspective but that. Since the world doesn’t revolve around a woman’s emotions, it’s very easy for them to react inappropriately to a given situation.
March 26th, 2007 at 6:33 pm - IP Man-Hash: b970e8787af34
Dr Z, I stand corrected. Janitors and pool-guys are very manly occupations, and I was wrong to put them down. I was drawing on my experience in the heat of the moment, without thinking of the larger repercussions. I once almost got into a fight with my pool guy, and I knew a lawyer woman who was dating a janitor. Let me rephrase:
Women higher-up on the social latter (i.e. women with college degrees - I refuse to acknowledge them as intelligent) seek dregs for companions. The doctor dates the dead-beat; the lawyer dates the guy who just got out of jail; the politician sleeps with the fight-picker-for-no-reason guy, etc…
March 26th, 2007 at 6:49 pm - IP Man-Hash: 40112e15ef349
Because “intelligent” women want so bad to have balls that dating a man with a pair of his own is repugnant to them.
They want the derelicts and scum of society to take in as stray dogs to rule over. But in the end, they just get their ass kicked, cheated on or killed. An ironic justice.