Public Sperking…I Mean Speaking

I can count the number of great women public speakers throughout history on one hand. Zero.

Women make lousy public speakers. They can’t engage an audience and they certainly can’t keep the attention of an audience for longer than a few minutes without relying on some kind of charlatan, amateur sexual provocation. That much is no secret.

What is worth discussing is just how much better than women men are when it comes to being eloquent with the mouth — lots better.

To begin any public address, a man will start with a joke to warm up the audience. This device has worked brilliantly for millennia of oration; from Homer to Hitler. Right off the top, this is completely out for women. Women can’t be funny, so instead of a joke, you get a completely flummoxed pseudo-expert in a skirt babbling on about statistics or milestones or other nonsense straight out of the gate. That’s exactly what a crowd of people wants to do before they’ve finished their first cup of coffee: math.

Another reason why men are so good and so much better than women at speaking is that they know what they’re talking about. Men know quite a bit about a lot of things. We’re renaissance men after all — all of us in our own way are renaissance men. But before climbing onto a stage to discourse on a topic, men perform additional and extensive research on it. We just don’t like to embarrass ourselves by getting caught with our pants around our ankles and our lack of facts hanging out for everyone to see. That’s not a man’s style.

Women on the other hand, most likely got into their position as “expert” through some hiring quota or affirmative action mandate. Who knows what it was, we all know what it wasn’t: being an expert. And while these mandates and diversity quotas are essential to the “gender equality” movement, they are pure poison to the art of public speaking.

Most importantly, however, is that men will stand up and be counted for what they’re saying. They’ll put it all on the line if what they think they’re saying is true — and for that reason it might as well be. Women have never had the courage to do this. As soon as someone starts tossing heads of lettuce and tomatoes at them for speaking their minds, they throw up facts and datums like popcorn at attacking seagulls and dive behind the podium for cover. Did Thomas Paine or Guy Fawkes ever pull that kind of shit? Certainly no, they did not.

I don’t even want to get into how clumsily women throw their sentences together. All I will say is that if the human brain spontaneously combusted if the word ‘basically’ was said more than like a hundred times during a half hour stretch, women wouldn’t even be allowed to open their mouths in public anymore. A chimp with a Speak and Spell strapped to its back could throw thoughts that stuck to the wall in a more cohesive pattern.

Related Articles:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

89 Comments in 89 threads.»

Pages: « 5 4 [3] 2 1 » Show All

Comment by Female
2006-11-19 02:19:15

smrtpants said:

Not a day goes by that I don’t ‘thank my lucky stars’ that my parents chose to raise me as a female…

Are you seriously suggesting that your parents had to make a decision regarding your gender identity? Or are you trying to put the wind up some of your viewers?

 
Comment by smrtpants
2006-11-19 02:04:05

Arielle said:

“When is a woman not a sex-object?”

When she’s Rosie O’Donnell.

Unless, of course, Rosie O’Donnell doesn’t even qualify as a woman. ;)

As long as she keeps taking her medication she does…

Not a day goes by that I don’t ‘thank my lucky stars’ that my parents chose to raise me as a female…

 
Comment by Oldone
2006-01-26 01:50:35

Indeed Ozgur, feminists are so terrified of inferiority that they try to turn opinion into scientific fact, thus lowering the collective intelligence of all.

 
Comment by Arielle
2006-01-20 16:48:09

“When is a woman not a sex-object?”

When she’s Rosie O’Donnell.

Unless, of course, Rosie O’Donnell doesn’t even qualify as a woman. ;)

 
Comment by Nicole
2006-01-20 03:49:02

Dick, don’t child me old man.

 
Comment by Özgür
2006-01-19 16:21:49

Oldone said:
Fascinating, you are actually suggesting that since Dick’s views are not as yours, he is ignorant. As though the only correct views are those with which you agree and only those people who are of a like mind as you partake in wisdom. Thusly it falls upon you to determine which views on gender roles and sexism are correct. What blatant arrogance, how truly close minded, a very ignorant statement.

Unfortunately, this is the attitude of all professionals nowadays, especially feminazi psychologists. They think that they have a somewhat different grasp of reality which makes them special, even in topics that are philosophical and obscure in nature. We are being bombarded by ideologies masquerading as science. If you dare reject them, then you are ignorant, stupid and insane.

 
Comment by Oldone
2006-01-19 15:51:25

Talyn said: “As a trained professional I will try to respect the fact that it is not your fault that you are ignorant in your views on gender, gender roles, and sexism, it is just the way that you were brought up?

Fascinating, you are actually suggesting that since Dick’s views are not as yours, he is ignorant. As though the only correct views are those with which you agree and only those people who are of a like mind as you partake in wisdom. Thusly it falls upon you to determine which views on gender roles and sexism are correct. What blatant arrogance, how truly close minded, a very ignorant statement.

Talyn said: “Or, perhaps it was a vulnerable moment in your life in which you were scorned or threatened by the power of a woman.?

Yes of course, when ever there is something or some where women are not allowed it is because men are threatened, scared of the power of women. That must be why for a long time the U.S. military would not allow women in combat, the Military was obviously afraid of women. Sure they can storm the beaches of Normandy, or fight in the jungles of Vietnam or Cambodia, but the entire Military is terribly afraid of women. That explains it, I mean I could not be anything like the fact that with male and female battalions on the field there would be excessive sexual tension and concentration would drop. I could not be the fact that men will general feel more protective of women than men and that would hinder a soldier during combat. (this is why opposite sex battalions are kept separate.) It certainly could not be that a 220lb man in full combat gear, is not likely to be picked up by a 110lb female and carried to safety if he is injured. Nope, it is because men are threatened by women. Wow, it was so obviously ridiculous, men are not threatened by women, women are just not happy unless everything is screwed up by them.

 
Comment by Dick Masterson
2006-01-19 15:25:50

Nicole said:
And when a woman says someting men don’t like, she is turned into a sex object. It works both ways.

When is a woman not a sex object? Ah what a child you are, Nicole.

-Dick

 
Comment by Nicole
2006-01-19 13:54:31

Oh I agreed with some things, and not with others.

I thought I’d just stick to one point. Don’t worry about coming up with an argument then.

 
Comment by Abaddon_fff
2006-01-19 13:49:23

Ok so instead of trying to rebut the whole arguement you pick one part of it to try to prove a point?

 
Comment by Nicole
2006-01-19 13:47:26

Okay now that I’ve taken the time to read you’re lovely comment I’ll sum up what I think.

‘Why, when a Man speaks up, if people disagree with him, the first thing that is said is a direct attack upon his penis?’

And when a woman says someting men don’t like, she is turned into a sex object. It works both ways.

 
Comment by Abaddon_fff
2006-01-19 13:43:12

Simply because you have to read more doesn’t mean that I am rambling, it means you are lazy. That was called a rebuttal, and in doing so I had to quote Plato. I actually only wrote about 3 paragraphs.

 
Comment by Nicole
2006-01-19 13:34:55

Abaddon_fff , you really like to ramble dont ya?

 
Comment by Abaddon_fff
2006-01-17 16:11:07

Plato said:

Dick- Interesting name you have chosen for yourself. See if you can guess what sex I am…I think that people like you are the reason that America has become a joke. A person such as yourself has obvious talent and initiative and you start a website dedicated to an absolutely idiotic concept.

-Do you ever think that his name might actually be Richard or Dick? Or is it always just an phallic totem to you? While I don’t agree with Dick on everything he says in this website, I think that he speaks a lot of truth that many are unwilling to hear. On another note America isn’t a “joke” it never has been, never will be, every nation upon this planet has gone through turbulent times, and some have perservered while others have not, if America will or won’t that is for time to tell.

The topic of the value and abilities of women, on their own or as compared to men…is so without value or merit that it baffles me as to what inspired you to create such crap in the first place. You could be doing so much good for people and you are wasting time with this?

-Much of the industrialized world has become “genderized” with “gender issues” being used to fund many organizations that have no buisness in public policy. It is my firm belief that Men are vastly unrepresented in many areas of politics/society. To say that these issues are “crap” is ignorance in itself.

I urge women to immediately cease reading and responding to this sorry excuse for a man. It really is true that if you ignore someone like this, they will go away…and that is the only choice you have because you WILL NOT do anything to change the frightening way that he thinks.

-You advocate a boycott of women in this site, while the first thing that you read as soon as you enter it, is that no women are allowed here in the first place. We (as Men) will not go away, for we are a part of society as well, and many of us refuse to be marginalized. While some of what Dick says is a fallacy, much of what he says (while not PC) is true to some extent.

It is sad that I even came across this site in the first place, though ironic enough a woman informed me about it. She thinks it is hillarious, and is pretty sure based on experience that “Dick” has an incredibly small penis…if he has one at all.

-Why, when a Man speaks up, if people disagree with him, the first thing that is said is a direct attack upon his penis? If sir/madam you were actually interested in debating Mr. Masterson, why do you personally insult his reproductive organs? If you wish to insult why is it that you focus upon one part of his body? Instead why dont you insult the things that you find disagreeable to you on this site?

Dick, I truly hope that one day you wake up…stop being a moron…and contribute something valuable to society.

-Plato

-Sir/Madam you don’t deserve the name of a great philosopher, if you wish to insult during discourse.

 
Comment by Dick Masterson
2006-01-17 16:06:42

“The power of a woman”, aka “goddess power”. The power to leave nagging comments on random websites and the lack to simply fuck off.

-Dick

 
Comment by Abaddon_fff
2006-01-17 15:49:27

Talyn said:

Dick-
In researching info on sexism I ran across your website. As a trained professional I will try to respect the fact that it is not your fault that you are ignorant in your views on gender, gender roles, and sexism, it is just the way that you were brought up.

-Spoken like a true feminist, what she/he fails to mention is the innate biological/mental differences between men and women and the lack of respect and understanding between the two. Obviously it must be the way we were brought up, it couldn’t possibly be wisdom gained through life experiences.

Or, perhaps it was a vulnerable moment in your life in which you were scorned or threatened by the power of a woman.

-Of course once again, one must be “threatened” or in “fear” of women in order to make statements such as this.

 
Comment by Nicole
2005-07-22 09:51:04

Oh Esther, I don’t know how you can accuse Plato of “personal insults directed towards the genitalia” when your entire argument seems to be that having a vagina renders half the population of being incapable to perform simple tasks.

 
Comment by Esther
2005-07-21 18:12:46

Ahhh, personal insults directed towards the genitalia, how very feminine. I would think exposing women for the frauds that they really are is a noble enough cause, but apparently that is not the case for some readers. I guess fantastic illusions of equity are harder to break than I had previously believed. Keep fighting the good fight Dick, don’t let these hate-mongers get you down.

 
Comment by Plato
2005-07-17 13:06:29

Dick- Interesting name you have chosen for yourself. See if you can guess what sex I am…I think that people like you are the reason that America has become a joke. A person such as yourself has obvious talent and initiative and you start a website dedicated to an absolutely idiotic concept. The topic of the value and abilities of women, on their own or as compared to men…is so without value or merit that it baffles me as to what inspired you to create such crap in the first place. You could be doing so much good for people and you are wasting time with this?

I urge women to immediately cease reading and responding to this sorry excuse for a man. It really is true that if you ignore someone like this, they will go away…and that is the only choice you have because you WILL NOT do anything to change the frightening way that he thinks.

It is sad that I even came across this site in the first place, though ironic enough a woman informed me about it. She thinks it is hillarious, and is pretty sure based on experience that “Dick” has an incredibly small penis…if he has one at all.

Dick, I truly hope that one day you wake up…stop being a moron…and contribute something valuable to society.

-Plato

 
Comment by Talyn
2005-07-16 20:18:57

Dick-
Interesting analogy, and I appreciate your need to clarify. From what I’ve read you seem to an intellectual person. However, I wonder what it was about that particular piece of my statement that caused you to reply and yet leave my other wonderings unanswered? Help me, if I may ask for such, to understand how it is that you have come to these conclusions?

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis