« Ask Dick: Why is Prostitution Illegal?
Ask Dick: How Manly Was The Apollo 11 Mission? »

Ask Dick: Has Feminism Affected Anything?

Necroswordsman of decayingsword.mabtw.com has sent me the following question.

Hey Dick, I have a question. In most of my life I have wondered how feminists have affected the media. For example, nowadays, a children’s presenter has to be clearly a young guy or they’re branded a pedophile. You get what I mean.

I’d really like some answers.

And I’d really like those barking-dog shock-collars to become the hottest women’s fashion item for 2007. Imagine what a utopia that would be. Every time a woman went to open her mouth, she’d get an electric Five Across the Eyes.

Women are too terrified during a crisis to say anything anyway. What’s the downside? At least this way they’d have an excuse. A sexy excuse.

Thinking back on children’s presenters, a few legends immediately come to mind: Captain Kangaroo, Mr. Wizard, and Mr. Rogers. Unlike any goddamn woman has ever done, these men brought smiles to the faces of millions of children for decades. That makes them a million times better than your average mother. I have a word for these men: legends. Women have a word for these men as well: pedophiles.

Women are so far up their own ass with how fucking great they are, they can’t give one ounce of credit to anyone who has ever done anything fantastic — or should I say mantastic. Women never get any credit for anything in the first place, so who can blame them. You can’t give someone a backwards purple nurple if you don’t know what it is. And it’s not called credit when you get the blame for fucking up, which women get and do constantly. It’s called blame. That’s why it’s actually called blame and not credit. Blame is all women know and that’s why they shoot it out of their mouths all day like broken sprinklers of shit.

But did feminism cause this?

Absolutely not. I was thinking about this while I was writing the above — that’s just the average day in the life of a man: thinking, writing, watching TV, snacking on some cashews, and not listening to someone on the phone all at the same time. I came to the conclusion that feminism has not affected shit in society.

The reason women call men children’s presenters pedophiles is because they’re immature and they think it’s funny.

Women have the emotional maturity of methadone addicts. They think everything in the world is funny. Shit, I make women laugh all the time and I don’t even try; they’re like retarded. You don’t even have to make a joke and they’ll laugh at it. And that includes laughing at the hard work and child rearing programmes put out by these brave men called children’s presenters.

Feminism didn’t make women behave poorly. They’ve been doing that for eons. Feminism just called attention to it.

ShareThis

Related Articles:

This entry was posted under Ask Dick.

101 Responses to “Ask Dick: Has Feminism Affected Anything?”

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 » Show All

  1. Necroswordsman Says:
    March 31st, 2007 at 2:26 pm - IP Man-Hash: 35a3bf5e9bc19

    sonyad said:
    As long as discussion is respectful and pertinent to the topic/off topic subtopic at hand you’re likely to find most members can be amenable.

    Not to mention having proper grammar and spelling helps. Along with not holding down the caps button and looking like a complete retard.

    [Quote]
  2. sonyad Says:
    April 1st, 2007 at 2:42 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7

    I just realised something. There’s just one senator Clinton.
    That was low. But not incongruous your general right eye challenged outlook on politics.

    Wolfe, the existence of GE Capital Bonds and the like does not negate the dollar’s existence, role or importance now does it? Nor can I see it take the place of the dollar in the eventuality of a descent into anarchy. Or indeed be worth anything at all. Do you?

    It seems to me you’re acutely biased (to the right). You actually enjoy entertaining the pipe dream of a social philosophy that is leberwurstianism (an atrocious one, if you just take the time to thought experiment with it even a little) though you have enough sense to stop short of proselytising its enactment.

    Or, more precisely, the abolishment of government in favour of anarchy.

    Better dread the ‘privatised’ governments that would inevitably emerge out of anarchy.

    - ALIZEE - Jen ai marre

    [Quote]
  3. P Coderch Says:
    August 10th, 2007 at 3:09 pm - IP Man-Hash: 52ddc4a390467

    sonyad said:

    Wolfe. You purposefully eschew the point.

    What are you gonna do? Use GE Capital Bonds at Metro Cash & Carry or WalMart in Backwater, Flyover Country to buy a Gillette razor like the cheap (likely Chinese countermade) sharp little fucker I use?

    Just invoke the infallibility of the market whenever you’re in trouble? People are really overdoing the ‘invisible hand’ thing. It’s getting a tad old.

    Human beings are not 128 bit precision floating point data processors with a single decision threshold but with unpredictable and wildly varying intervals (in time and from individual to individual) of decision threshold.

    You wouldn’t believe what people are willing to pay for stuff if put on the spot as was the case through price raising orchestrated between all our domestic concrete manufacturers last year.

    Sometimes going without or moving your business elsewhere is NOT an option, unlike in Dakota’s pixie fairy economic fantasies. And last year was but another in the recent building boom across the country.

    It was still cheaper than importing the stuff, to be sure. But really not by all that much at all, despite their much lower production costs.

    In the real world, the one we live in, these are called cartel policies and are not that uncommon by a long shot. Yet another roadtrain one can leisurely drive through the holes in Dakota’s argument.

    Obviously, the state, more specifically the Office of Fair Trading, intervened with lawsuits. Some resolved to mediocre fines likely to be refunded on successful appeal (one such fined manufacturer already has had their fine refunded and is free to charge whatever it wants) with perhaps some state compensations to boot for the ordeal.

    Corruption inquiries are now pending into how the OFT orchestrated the case. Word is massive kickbacks to the wife of the president of the OFT were in order for the case to be botched. The president of the OFT himself already seems to have surreptitiously concluded a 30 day notice for a resignation the devil and he only must have known about. Out of the blue and for no apparent reason. Certainly totally unconnected to the case.

    Seems corruption is better business indeed.

    And this is but a single concrete example among many of the market failing despite state and government (through corruption thereof), not because of them.

    Dakota will now perhaps argue one or both of the following:

    1. Fair trade is whatever the buyers and sellers themselves alone agree upon. Even if it is really just the sellers agreeing amongst themselves what to uniformly charge for an indispensable or indispensable exceptionally (such as concrete in a building boom) product the buyers crave(concrete has to be poured continuously from foundation to penthouse and roof or you can piss it all good bye if it dries in batches or levels).

    The sellers should have the right to charge you whatever exorbitant prices they well please to convene upon for their product s despite the fact they could never afford to do so without a concerted effort working perpendicularly with competition.

    Cartel policies are not a failure, he’ll say. It’s just the glory of capitalism at work.

    2. Without the state this would never have happened in the first place or would never have been as severe. It would certainly not be endemic to the market.
    ___
    Both contentions being utter poppycock, of course. I suspect he’ll refrain from contending these contentions lest alone he adhere to my prediction.

    Libertarianism is utter nonsense. If Dakota had saved any room at all for reason on the matter he’d likewise see this for the truth it is.

    Guess irrationality is not exclusive gender after all.

    Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha…Sonyad having a Marxist meltdown. Priceless…

    P Coderch

    [Quote]
  4. P Coderch Says:
    August 10th, 2007 at 3:30 pm - IP Man-Hash: 52ddc4a390467

    The real question that this guy shouls have asked is: is there anything that feminism has NOT affected - negatively, of course.

    P Coderch

    [Quote]
  5. Necroswordsman Says:
    November 19th, 2007 at 7:48 am - IP Man-Hash: 422940479a69d

    P Coderch said:

    The real question that this guy shouls have asked is: is there anything that feminism has NOT affected - negatively, of course.

    P Coderch

    I was more wondering about just child presenters, and it’s easier to blame feminists than women, since feminists -are- all crazy bitches.

    Good times. Where does the innocence go.

    [Quote]
  6. Clair Says:
    December 1st, 2007 at 11:14 pm - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6

    Dick makes girls laugh? You know who kinda reminds me of Dick? You know the film clip for Barbie Girl? Well he reminds me of Ken in it, and Barbie reminds me of everything Dick bitches about women. Just an observation.

    [Quote]
  7. Billy Says:
    December 2nd, 2007 at 1:17 am - IP Man-Hash: cf5569ce44177

    Clair said:

    Dick makes girls laugh? You know who kinda reminds me of Dick? You know the film clip for Barbie Girl? Well he reminds me of Ken in it, and Barbie reminds me of everything Dick bitches about women. Just an observation.

    And you remind me of the song by Pink called - Stupid Girl

    [Quote]
  8. Clair Says:
    December 2nd, 2007 at 1:57 am - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6

    ya know…I wasn’t being mean. You’re just being stupid, because you don’t know me. So how can you come to conclusions like that?

    [Quote]
  9. Mark Says:
    December 2nd, 2007 at 2:44 am - IP Man-Hash: 2998d637ad7de

    Clair said:

    ya know…I wasn’t being mean. You’re just being stupid, because you don’t know me. So how can you come to conclusions like that?

    Because you’re stupid.

    [Quote]
  10. Clair Says:
    December 2nd, 2007 at 4:06 am - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6

    …okay…

    [Quote]
  11. The WISE ONE Says:
    January 3rd, 2008 at 1:53 am - IP Man-Hash: 38a7212c8ff33

    OH LORDY.
    YOU MEN ARE DISGUSTING.
    HAHA.
    :]
    GET A LIFE.
    I WRITE THAT, DUE TO IT BEING EVIDENT THAT ANY BRITTLE ATTEMPT YOU MAY HAVE MADE TO GET ONE HAS NOT WORKED.
    -CARO, THE FEMINIST.
    NOW SUCK MY INVISIBLE DICK[BECAUSE I KNOW YOU'RE ALL GAY.]

    [Quote]
  12. MansVoice Says:
    January 3rd, 2008 at 2:48 am - IP Man-Hash: 2e9f52b62c482

    Trolling for cock?

    Bugger off, feminist slut. Go play your mind games in your pseudo “intellectual” forums - HAHAHAHHA.

    [Quote]
  13. Cunt Puncher Says:
    January 21st, 2008 at 4:23 am - IP Man-Hash: aa871a3792e9a

    Anonymous said:

    Female, you have been told that this is a strictly “no women” site? There are plenty of feminists websites where your views would be welcome. I think you’ll agree that you’re just diverting/hijacking a good manly discussion.

    Men, ignore the female and continue where we left off before the interruption.

    I agree with Frederick, this talk of an Islamic invasion of Europe is utter non-sense. These people may be of Islamic origin, but their religious beliefs and practices will die out just as other religions have. Islamic influx and subsequent secularisation more like.

    OK fucktard, and the difference between the two is…………………..Bzzzzzzzzzzzz……….time’s up, CUNT.

    [Quote]
  14. Domchick Says:
    January 23rd, 2008 at 3:56 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7883c4f2b5c56

    Anonymous said:

    Female, you have been told that this is a strictly “no women” site? There are plenty of feminists websites where your views would be welcome. I think you’ll agree that you’re just diverting/hijacking a good manly discussion.

    Men, ignore the female and continue where we left off before the interruption.

    I agree with Frederick, this talk of an Islamic invasion of Europe is utter non-sense. These people may be of Islamic origin, but their religious beliefs and practices will die out just as other religions have. Islamic influx and subsequent secularisation more like.

    So is this website like a little treehouse club with a cute little painted sign that says No Girls Allowed? You may think this makes you look really manly and macho, because only a real man would be so misogynistic (oh I’m sorry, I should probably use smaller words for a keg sucking frat boy like yourself), but in reality, you just look like little boy who’s too afraid of women to be able to appreciate strength and intelligence. Have fun with your insecurity and your own hand.

    [Quote]
  15. detached Says:
    January 23rd, 2008 at 7:24 pm - IP Man-Hash: c3f4479460146

    I’d rather jack off with sandpaper than be with a chick like “domchick”. I’m sure you’re hot…fatty.

    [Quote]
  16. MansVoice Says:
    January 23rd, 2008 at 11:46 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7b55501cead9a

    who’s too afraid of women to be able to appreciate strength and intelligence

    I haven’t met any woman smarter or more capable than myself.

    I say you are afraid of real men. Fuck off feminist cunt.

    [Quote]
  17. Billy Says:
    January 24th, 2008 at 1:47 am - IP Man-Hash: df8a37f402a4d

    Domchick said:

    Female, you have been told that this is a strictly “no women” site? There are plenty of feminists websites where your views would be welcome. I think you’ll agree that you’re just diverting/hijacking a good manly discussion.

    Men, ignore the female and continue where we left off before the interruption.

    I agree with Frederick, this talk of an Islamic invasion of Europe is utter non-sense. These people may be of Islamic origin, but their religious beliefs and practices will die out just as other religions have. Islamic influx and subsequent secularisation more like.

    So is this website like a little treehouse club with a cute little painted sign that says No Girls Allowed? You may think this makes you look really manly and macho, because only a real man would be so misogynistic (oh I’m sorry, I should probably use smaller words for a keg sucking frat boy like yourself), but in reality, you just look like little boy who’s too afraid of women to be able to appreciate strength and intelligence. Have fun with your insecurity and your own hand.Why is everything to do about sex with these little girls? hobag

    [Quote]
  18. Billy Says:
    January 24th, 2008 at 1:53 am - IP Man-Hash: df8a37f402a4d

    Billy said:

    Dumchick said:

    So is this website like a little treehouse club with a cute little painted sign that says No Girls Allowed? You may think this makes you look really manly and macho, because only a real man would be so misogynistic (oh I’m sorry, I should probably use smaller words for a keg sucking frat boy like yourself), but in reality, you just look like little boy who’s too afraid of women to be able to appreciate strength and intelligence. Have fun with your insecurity and your own hand.

    oops..
    Why is everything to do about sex with these little girls? hoes

    [Quote]
  19. Purba Says:
    February 15th, 2008 at 12:36 pm - IP Man-Hash: 93a3b988c9b2b

    Men- I must apologise for being wordy- its’ merely exemplary of the vast superiority of our male mind. I aim to incontrovertibly put feminists back in their place.
    We men are much like the origin of all of our proverbs “the knowledge of many condensed by the wit of one”. so we usually opt for as few words as necessary.

    Unfortunately, as per the simpleton, for feminists- it takes a long while for facts to sink in.

    Fact:
    Feminism has NOT constructively helped any women aside from its’ own incestuous, back-patting, intellectual masturbatory demographic: white, over-privileged, non economically viable, unattractive, overweight and androgenically imbalanced.

    Males and their tireless, selfless, knowledge-seeking minds & inventions have done more to assist women than any feminist could dare dream.
    Feminism has not lifted women out of poverty, provided health & nutrition, medicine nor pharmacy, safe childbirth, immunized their children, made safe drinking water, basic hygiene, contraception and reproductive choice, removed them from violence, abuse, slavery or real degradation (as opposed to imagined- as per the damaged psyche of the bloated feminist dogmatic/diatribist), labour-saving machinery nor anything remotely useful.

    Thus, Feminists hate us men because: MEN HAVE HELPED WOMEN MORE THAN FEMINISM/FEMINISTS: more concretely, more intellectually and more economically than anything associated with feminism.

    Their emotive anti-male vitriol (bereft of fact, reason or research) is merely a primitive psychological reaction- the outward projection of hostility due to deep-rooted self-hatred and inferiority-complexes.

    Plato’s time-less wisdom best describes Feminism: “As empty vessels make the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest blabbers.”

    Say it loud, say it proud- “men HELP women more than feminists help women, so femmos hate us men”.
    Truth hurts, hey femmos?

    [Quote]
  20. Wisdom Says:
    April 12th, 2008 at 5:22 pm - IP Man-Hash: 56cd7d82603b9

    Just go suck your dad’s cock and be glad you are a real man!
    Men with men rock!

    [Quote]

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 » Show All

Leave a Reply

Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis