Women Comment Here Because They Want to Fuck Me.
Women are forbidden from this entire site. They’re forbidden from reading the articles here. They’re forbidden from commenting here. And most of all, they are forbidden from sending me bitchy emails about either of those rules.
So why the fuck do they?
The reason why they’re forbidden is simple: women do not have the man-brain capacity to understand the truth, which is what this site is. Trying to fit the answers these articles contain into a woman’s head is like trying to put ten pounds of shit in a one pound bag. You just end up breaking the poor, pretty little bag and getting shit all over the place.
Women can’t help themselves from reading these articles and posting responses to them — and then emailing me about it like they did something fucking good — because uncontrollably and inescapably they all want to fuck me.
It’s simple logic really. Every woman who comments starts out by insulting every woman I’ve ever been involved with — the implication being that she is better than them and that I should give women another chance, vis a vis her.
That’s like wearing something hot and getting way too drunk at a bar. It’s asking to get fucked whether she knows it or not.
Or they insult my penis size. That’s obvious reverse psychology; a reverse psychology so simplistic and backwards — so single-minded and rife with failure that it could only come from the mind of a woman.
“Your penis is small! P.S. Prove me wrong! Why the fuck else would I put my actual email address into the comment box of a website where I’m not welcome?”
P.S. Shut the fuck up.
Women respect a man’s ability to treat women like they deserve to be treated: like crap. It’s not something they can help, it’s biology. It’s why women like men who have shitloads of money — that means a better and more comfortable survival for them. It’s why women like men with nice shoes and nice cars — it means more money. Women like men who treat women poorly because listening to women and respecting their opinion is the only sure-fire way known to man (besides opening a restaurant) to lose the one thing women treasure most: money.
What I’m saying is that all the women who participate in this site are hookers; not the money kind of hookers either, but the attention kind. I’ll let you decide which is worse.
Trick question! They’re one in the same.
Related Articles:
May 9th, 2006 at 7:55 am - IP Man-Hash: 5950bb08d3016
Me as well. I’ve heard it explained as a challenge thing, meaning the dirtbags, but your revelation speaks volumes.
Women don’t understand cause and effect and are horrible decision makers under pressure.
Since they leach off men for everything else in life, it makes sense that they want to borrow our superior logical reasoning skills.
This makes sense why not only dirtbags, but smart successful men get the women, the women see it as them making many correct decisions that they couldn’t.
They think “wow a man got that far without a vagina, sleeping around or affirmative action, he must have lots of man smarts”
May 9th, 2006 at 8:10 am - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
Interesting. No, don’t count me in awe (though I’m in that from the cumulative total of the site). I’m not sure I agree, but that’s a fascinating viewpoint.
Lukasz said something that was key: “Women don’t understand cause and effect and are horrible decision makers under pressure.”. I’m not sure about the first part, but the second part is true in every situation I’ve observed. That doesn’t mean women are hopeless, but it does mean they’d better be incredibly good at dealing with pressure — 10 times better than men merely to match decision-making, ignoring other male advantages.
And Dick’s argument is in essence that these women manage to recognize their failings and seek to compensate, even to the point of seeking out men who are poor decision makers and treat them like garbage. [NB - this is the extreme example, not the norm; most men are good decision makers and their treatment of women will vary].
Very interesting.
-wolfe
May 9th, 2006 at 9:55 am - IP Man-Hash: 367aa6a77dd36
Wolfe, why exactly don’t you know if you agree or not?
Dick’s article is pretty straight up, without any beating around the bush - surely you should know if you agree with him or not?
It’s not a crime to be in awe of Dick, you know. No one will think less of you for it.
May 9th, 2006 at 1:53 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7cdc163b4268d
this is what i think of people like you- blithering idiots who feel they have nothing better to do then sit in their moms basement and write about why they think they are so much better then everyone else, probably because they were made fun of when they were children and want to feel important.
well guess what? you had better go back to the 17th century man, because times are changing. if you really think writing this is going to make a difference in the world, then you are in serious denial. women are not idiots and if they DO want to have sex with an idiot like you; then they surely are. Its not my fault that i went to standford and studied russian architechture and got an A in every one my classes. But it IS your fault that you are so stupid and hypocritical that you think that by making this website you are doing something! wow…i’m astonished
I don’t care if you think i’m bitching to you, because frankly what you think isn’t really anything at all; so you can just stuff all that shit that you wrote back into your brain! Im sure it won’t damage anything in there!
thanks for your time
May 9th, 2006 at 1:57 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7cdc163b4268d
oh yeah and guess what? if it wasn’t for women, you MEN wouldn’t be here in the first place…why don’t you think about that for a bit…although you probably don’t want to waste too much of your time since im sure things move very slowly in that small brain of yours
May 9th, 2006 at 2:02 pm - IP Man-Hash: e66326523d778
Stanford, not Standford.
May 9th, 2006 at 2:06 pm - IP Man-Hash: dad3b6cb7e5a4
Womenaresmarterthenmen, may I have an interview? I’m writing a paper on the subject of men vs. women and I would love to have and interview with you, my e-mail is rioburkholder@g-mail.com, I will probably end up making said paper into a book.
-Rio
May 9th, 2006 at 2:11 pm - IP Man-Hash: f539d53649dc6
Why do women always feel the need to lie about everything? Well, actually, I guess maybe you didn’t lie. I’ve never heard of Standford, so I’m sure it’s possible that their educational curriculum is rigorous enough to produce a woman with the intellectual capabilities of yourself. No doubt, it is equally discerning as to its entrance requirements. When I read your post, I thought maybe you were trying to claim to have gone to Stanford, a fine institution no doubt, but that can’t be it.
By the way, you do realize you managed to prove everything Dick said in his article right?
Thanks for playing.
May 9th, 2006 at 2:20 pm - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3
What kind of job do you get with a Russian architechture degree? Fucking a real architect in exchange for room, board, and purses?
-Dick
May 9th, 2006 at 3:22 pm - IP Man-Hash: f2a1311f766b9
And off they go, having completed their little “protest” against this terrible site (sob) and given it a “walloping” in their own little stunted minds they return to their little femmo nazi sites and have a brag about their great acheivement in “fighting” the patriarchy and how they made some imaginary gain, had some illusionary beneficial affect.
All they do is once again prove beyond doubt the title of this site is 100% correct.
Next……
May 9th, 2006 at 4:30 pm - IP Man-Hash: 1633be816f3c7
womenaresmarterthenmen said:
this is what i think of people like you- blithering idiots who feel they have nothing better to do then sit in their moms basement and write about why they think they are so much better then everyone else, probably because they were made fun of when they were children and want to feel important.
Ahh, just what I love to see, an “educated” woman that can’t comprehend the use of grammar. Here’s a hint womenaresmarterthan men, nobody cares what you think. Also, three episodes of Dr. Phil doesn’t make you a therapist. I see a lot of stereotyping here for a women that seems to espouse the superiority of women. Does that make you a sexist? Hmm I wonder….
well guess what? you had better go back to the 17th century man, because times are changing. if you really think writing this is going to make a difference in the world, then you are in serious denial. women are not idiots and if they DO want to have sex with an idiot like you; then they surely are. Its not my fault that i went to standford and studied russian architechture and got an A in every one my classes. But it IS your fault that you are so stupid and hypocritical that you think that by making this website you are doing something! wow…i’m astonished
Hey! Guess what? Times have changed and they are going to keep on doing so, however I doubt it’s going to be for the benefit of feminism. Men and women are starting to wake up to the fact that many women that are feminists are vile, poisoned, hypocritical creatures that represent no one but themselves. This website is doing something, its allowing men to band together and share ideas. However you are so bigoted and ignorant that you cannot see that, or if you do, you don’t like to think of the implications of it.
I don’t care if you think i’m bitching to you, because frankly what you think isn’t really anything at all; so you can just stuff all that shit that you wrote back into your brain! Im sure it won’t damage anything in there!
thanks for your time
Thank you for showing not only your stupidity and ignorance, but also your blatant sexism! It’s thoroughly refreshing to be proven right time and time again.
May 9th, 2006 at 4:34 pm - IP Man-Hash: 1633be816f3c7
womenaresmarterthenmen said:
oh yeah and guess what? if it wasn’t for women, you MEN wouldn’t be here in the first place…why don’t you think about that for a bit…although you probably don’t want to waste too much of your time since im sure things move very slowly in that small brain of yours.
Once again, your blatant sexism is apparent for all to see, if it wasn’t for MEN, the reproductive process would be incomplete. In an era of so-called “goddess” worship, women fail to understand that they aren’t the givers of life, Men actually are. Simply because you are an incubator doesn’t make women the “creators of the human race”. Men are the ones that give life, women simply carry our seed through too gestation.
Strength and Honor
May 9th, 2006 at 5:08 pm - IP Man-Hash: 19105c7fbb7a4
I don’t think we would be anywhere without ‘incubators’ either. Nor the egg.
Men alone are not the givers of life. It is wildy inaccurate to say that women simply carry your seed through to gestation - the sperm alone would have a hard time generating itself into a human being without an ‘incubator’ or without an egg to fertilize.
However, it is true to say that women alone are not the givers of life either.
The fact of the matter is, men AND women TOGETHER are the givers of life. Without the sperm and without the egg, without the ‘incubators’ or ’seed’ - none of us would be here. And yet despite this small yet significant factor, nobody seems to have cottened on to the concept that men and women need each other to survive on a basic and fundamental level.
And if the most important thing a human being can do is ensure the future of humanity - creating a life contributes greatly to that. And guess what? Men and women contribute to achieving that TOGETHER.
So who is better? The provider of the sperm that fertilizes the egg…or the provider of the egg and the incubator within which the new life can grow?
May 9th, 2006 at 9:27 pm - IP Man-Hash: f539d53649dc6
We don’t really need a human incubator though. So called test-tube babies prove this. A baby can be grown outside of a woman’s body. The egg itself however is, I suppose, important. Still, this is a stupid way to think of things, and of course only a stupid woman would resort to this idiotic non-sensical attempt at an ad hominem attack in the first place. Also, only another woman would be stupid enough to misread and misunderstand how the entire “discussion” came to occur. Once again, simply put, a woman made a stupid claim, a man easily defeated it, and another woman misunderstood it and somehow thought she was making a point. I don’t even want to be critical, it’s just sad.
Men are of course better in all things that men and women can compete in. Giving birth as a female is, or atleast should be, obviously not one of those things. However, in terms of reproduction as a whole, a woman can only produce a specific amount of babies in her lifetime, at set intervals. A man is able to reproduce with multiple women at all times. A woman is not. So yes, in a purely evolutionary reproductive view, men are better at reproduction than women are, if the measured output is taken into account. As that is the only objective way to measure reproductive ability, once again, nature has played a cruel joke on women and has made them inferior. Just as nature has made women intellectually and emotionally inferior, they are physically inferior in all ways, including reproductive ability. Once again, I am sorry to post this, I don’t even mean to, but it’s the truth.
May 10th, 2006 at 1:12 am - IP Man-Hash: 19105c7fbb7a4
Serp. That a man can reproduce more than women does not mean that he is better. If a man produces more he has to do so with more women, and so women are not completely taken out of the equation in this sense.
As for the the idea that we don’t need the incubator because we have test tube babies… do you even know what the method is for making test tube babies? Guess what, babies do not grow in test tubes - they are fertilized in test tubes and then inserted back into the mother’s womb - so the ‘incubator’ is still, in a technical sense, needed for the development of the fetus - test tube baby or no test tube baby.
Another point, more babies does not necessarily mean better. Of course reproduction is an important factor to the human race… that said, producing too many babies can have a destructive effect upon society, and where is the sense to creating more babies than we can support? It is true that a man CAN produce more babies as he is biologically designed to do so, it does not always mean that he does this, or even that this ability is useful to society - in fact (in terms of highly populous societies) it could be a disaster to society.
You do conceed that the egg is still important, that is where we share a common ground. Yes, it is still important, in much the same way as the sperm is important - both are needed to create life. Therefore my point still stands that even in the evolutionary reproductive sense, men and women have equal importance in the productive process.
It is funny how you accuse me of an ad-hominem attack and yet you go and do the exact thing to me. Do you even know what an argumentum ad-hominem is? It is an attack directed at a person rather than at their argument.
Here, you made the following statements:-
Rather than looking at my argument and criticising that, you criticise me as a woman, naming me stupid. In doing so you are doing precisely what you accuse me of. That is very hypocritical of you. Not only that, making comments about the stupidity of women does not make your argument any stronger, you are adding something completely superfluous to the discussion.
What happened was a woman made a claim that was partly true - without women you wouldn’t be here (which is not an idiotic claim, it is a part truth). A man countered with the comment that women are only incubators and that it is the man which is the ‘giver of life’ - again this is a partial truth, he did not ‘defeat’ any argument easily - he countered with another partial truth. My comment was not a misunderstanding of what he said, if you had read my response carefully you would note that I tried to incorporate both of their arguments and partial truths to make a general truth.
May 10th, 2006 at 1:44 am - IP Man-Hash: f727bcb8ffb8d
Enya said:
I don’t think we would be anywhere without ‘incubators’ either. Nor the egg.
Agreed, I never said that there wouldn’t be life without women. That wasn’t the point of my post.
Men alone are not the givers of life. It is wildy inaccurate to say that women simply carry your seed through to gestation - the sperm alone would have a hard time generating itself into a human being without an ‘incubator’ or without an egg to fertilize.
True.
However, it is true to say that women alone are not the givers of life either.
Very true, however Men aren’t considered equal in the reproductive process now days due to the lies of feminism, many(poor fathers) have impossible burdens placed upon them, and are then blamed when they cannot “provide” for both themselves and their children. These are all contributions to the “epidemic” of fatherlessness. Many men cannot afford to pay the child support orders (which are issued from flawed tables to begin with) and support their own household, and are left broke, homeless, and without any support (social or otherwise) from anyone. Then they’re called “deadbeats” and in many cases thrown in prison with hardened criminals ( and even then the debt builds up).
The fact of the matter is, men AND women TOGETHER are the givers of life. Without the sperm and without the egg, without the ‘incubators’ or ’seed’ - none of us would be here. And yet despite this small yet significant factor, nobody seems to have cottened on to the concept that men and women need each other to survive on a basic and fundamental level.
However when it comes to the raising of children, women are considered the “nurturers” even though there are many forms of evidence that can be provided to show that this is far from the truth. Many men are forced to fight an uphill battle(while being systematicly impoverished) simply to see the product of their seed all the while paying for it, whether or not they can be a part of their childrens lives. My point is that men are the ones that are considered insignificant in the reproductive process, for whatever reason even though you say that each are equally culpable.
And if the most important thing a human being can do is ensure the future of humanity - creating a life contributes greatly to that. And guess what? Men and women contribute to achieving that TOGETHER.
Agreed, however the question remains, if this is so why isn’t there a presumption of joint custody for both parents irregardless of marital status, if both are equally important and culpable in said process, and why is one sex given all of the choices in reproduction, while the other, is given all of the responsibility for the others choices and very few options themselves? This is the epitome of hypocrisy and blatant misandry in my view.
So who is better? The provider of the sperm that fertilizes the egg…or the provider of the egg and the incubator within which the new life can grow?
Neither is better or worse, however one is given all of the advantages and the other can be thrown away at will, as I said before, women are revered (goddess worship) while mens contributions are simply limited to his wallet (debt slavery) and not the things that a good man could teach his child (honor, love, compassion, justice, manhood, and discipline).
May 10th, 2006 at 3:33 am - IP Man-Hash: 19105c7fbb7a4
I totally agree with you on this point, and you have made a good one. I agree that men are not given a fair trial in terms of their children, that is (as you rightly pointed out) there is a myth (spread by feminism in the media) that women are the ‘nurturers’ and the men are not - this is a stupid lie. I am sure that men are capable of looking after children, I don’t believe that they have even been given the opportunity to demonstrate this.
This relates to what I mentioned above. These stereotypes with which we label both women and men are completely wrong and they are DAMAGING to both sexes. This myth that men are not nurturers is so untrue because if men were given a chance to, they would make excellent caregivers to their children in many ways. Not all women make excellent mothers either, some women do not habour these traits that women are supposed to own - one being that they are nurturers’. The day when men are considered as more than fertility machines and equal in the process of reproduction will be a day where the sexes are closer to equality, without a doubt.
That is my view too. If there were a means that I could change such laws I would support that cause whole-heartedly. That said, we could be talking about a wide-range of scenarios here. I think this could refer to topics such as contraception, abortion and custody etc. It is better to look at these situations on a case by case basis, rather than make generalisations. But, yeah, if we are to speak on a general level, it is hypocritical that although men and woman contribute to creating children together, men are often the ones holding the short straw. I sincerely hope that this changes in the future.
Well said. There are many things a good man can teach his children, and I do believe that all children desire and need a good father figure in his or her childhood. Again I will say that each case is different. Men do deserve more respect than they are given.
Thanks for your comments adaddon_fff.
May 10th, 2006 at 9:48 am - IP Man-Hash: 5950bb08d3016
Um myself and many others here have our PhDs, so I would get the sand out of your vagina before posting here again
May 10th, 2006 at 9:53 am - IP Man-Hash: 5950bb08d3016
And furthermore I own my own place, do research at a hospital and live a lifestyle the farthest thing from sitting in Mom’s basement
May 10th, 2006 at 12:05 pm - IP Man-Hash: 494fc8fdc34ab
She might want to try getting “architecture” right while she’s at it.